Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

- Original Message - From: "Alan Gresley" > This is far to complex. In maths, a fraction 3 over 2 is also the same > as 3 divided by 2. This markup and CSS does this. > > 3/2 > > div {line-height:160%;} /* or any other container *./ > sup, div sub {font-size:75%;} > > > Demo. > > <

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > >> I'm afraid you misunderstood the question, or the OP misunderstood what >> "fraction bar" means. It means a character resembling "/" but with >> different angle and properties, used to construct fractional numbers in a >> particular rendering

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

This page might be of help: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/math/#fractions Just remember that in the quest to make fractions that look like they are from a math book you might succeed visually but fail miserably in terms of accessibility - not to mention what would happen if someone tried to cop

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

- Original Message - From: "Troy Harshman" > also. Here's some sample code.. > > > > >.line {clear:left;} >ul {margin:7px 9px 0; padding:3px; list-style:none; > background:#eee; text-align:center; float:left;} >li.numerator {border-bottom:1px solid #000;} >p {flo

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

Hi Troy, > Although it may not be the best application for lists, I think using > my method isn't too bad and it is attractive. It's a bit clunky, but > probably not as clunky as other options. The only issue I see is when > there is a lack of styles, you'll be looking at numbers in lists with >

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

- Original Message - From: "Bill Braun" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:27 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Fraction bar > Eduardo, Norton Internet Security is reporting 47 virus threats coming > from this site. Are you aware of that? > > Bill B > Thanks, Bill, for the warning. My NO

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

Troy Harshman wrote: > Although it may not be the best application for lists, I think using > my method isn't too bad and it is attractive. Try this, see if it works. http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";> 2 3 Bill B

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

Isn't this all more about markup than about style? Skip Knox Boise State University __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Li

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

Although it may not be the best application for lists, I think using my method isn't too bad and it is attractive. It's a bit clunky, but probably not as clunky as other options. The only issue I see is when there is a lack of styles, you'll be looking at numbers in lists with bullets. But, you'll

Re: [css-d] Fraction bar

Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > I'm afraid you misunderstood the question, or the OP misunderstood what > "fraction bar" means. It means a character resembling "/" but with > different angle and properties, used to construct fractional numbers in a > particular rendering, similar to that of "½". It wa

Re: [css-d] IE6 doesn't see styles

Troy Harshman wrote: > I played with your code for a few minutes and it appears that the IE6 > conditional comments are working. I think your issue is related to > browser resolution. It looks fine in IE6 at 1280x1024, but not at > 1024x768. Firefox, it looks fine regardless of screen resolution. Y

Re: [css-d] IE6 doesn't see styles

Alan Gresley wrote: > My Multiple IE version sectors (conditional comments) were broken when I > allowed IE8 to write over IE7. Not knowing much the registry I assume > one fix is to uninstall and reinstall Multiple IE. > > > I think that's my problem. Installing IE8. I may try reinstalling

Re: [css-d] IE6 doesn't see styles

Bill Braun wrote: > Peter, > > I created a template that holds a whole bunch of pieces and parts for > a site I am working on. You can include or exclude the different > pieces/parts on each page as you wish. It should fit what you are > doing, at least as a start. > > It plays nicely with IE5.5

Re: [css-d] IE6 doesn't see styles

Troy Harshman wrote: > I played with your code for a few minutes and it appears that the IE6 > conditional comments are working. I think your issue is related to > browser resolution. It looks fine in IE6 at 1280x1024, but not at > 1024x768. Firefox, it looks fine regardless of screen resolution. Y

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: CSS-D Wiki SPAM infiltration

At 10:20 AM -0600 1/20/10, D A wrote: >This is maybe common knowledge, but I just noticed that the CSS-D Wiki >is, sadly, being overtaken by spam links. Nearly every page has a half >dozen bad links on it. I tried cleaning up one page and will try to do >it as I come across pages (fortunately, CSS

Re: [css-d] CSS-D Wiki SPAM infiltration

The good news, for me, is that this problem led to this post, which led me to learn that there is a CSS-D wiki. - Original Message - From: "D A" > This is maybe common knowledge, but I just noticed that the CSS-D Wiki > is, sadly, being overtaken by spam links. Nearly every page has a

[css-d] CSS-D Wiki SPAM infiltration

This is maybe common knowledge, but I just noticed that the CSS-D Wiki is, sadly, being overtaken by spam links. Nearly every page has a half dozen bad links on it. I tried cleaning up one page and will try to do it as I come across pages (fortunately, CSS-D Wiki still seems to be high on the googl

Re: [css-d] Width 100% Question - 3rd Attempt

Troy, Thanks for your input. I got to view it in 1024x768 and I see what you mean. I'll heed your suggestions thanks! Elli --- On Wed, 1/20/10, Troy Harshman wrote: > From: Troy Harshman > Subject: Re: [css-d] Width 100% Question - 3rd Attempt > To: "Elli Vizcaino" > Cc: cs...@css-discus

Re: [css-d] IE6 doesn't see styles

David Hucklesby wrote: (snip) >> Phew! That's a relief. >> >> Many thanks for that, James. You learn something every day. I was >> beginning to doubt IETester, but clearly it's getting it right. >> > > Regarding the conditional comments, I thought that this issue had been > fixed? There was a

[css-d] :: page check :: ~d

Goals: 1/ Usable in any given screen width (ie/6 fixed at 780 width) 2/ Look and feel: macho (off-topic comments appreciated off-list, please) Constructive suggestions and comments appreciated. markup css Be