[css-d] Flash and my CSS

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:42 PM, wrote: > I'm trying to add a Flash logo at the top of the page in a DIV called > header, which is in a DIV called container. The logo is 890 x 162. It > looks > fine on IE8, Chrome, and Safari, but when it's viewed on AOL 9.1 and IE8 > in > "compatibility mode"

[css-d] Flash and my CSS

I'm trying to add a Flash logo at the top of the page in a DIV called header, which is in a DIV called container. The logo is 890 x 162. It looks fine on IE8, Chrome, and Safari, but when it's viewed on AOL 9.1 and IE8 in "compatibility mode", there's a hair-line thin white line to the left

Re: [css-d] Header Text too close to the Menu in IE

> I've been developing a site www.audiocatz.com and had a few layout > problems which have all been eradicated and validated except one. The > only problem i have left is the header text is too close to the menu in > internet explorer and i cant find a way of keeping the original space > which show

Re: [css-d] Header Text too close to the Menu in IE

2010/7/6 Dipesh Parmar : > I've been developing a site www.audiocatz.com and had a few layout problems > which have all been eradicated and validated except one. The only problem i > have left is the header text is too close to the menu in internet explorer > and i cant find a way of keeping the

[css-d] Header Text too close to the Menu in IE

I've been developing a site www.audiocatz.com and had a few layout problems which have all been eradicated and validated except one. The only problem i have left is the header text is too close to the menu in internet explorer and i cant find a way of keeping the original space which shows up fi

Re: [css-d] help on avoid background-image to move while scrolling the page.

The URI is the same, some js errors will be taken care later. http://www.nuvemk.com/nascer/ Taking seriously (as ever) this list suggestions, I will then start with the screen size issues. Then, pass to IE7 issues. If I properly understood Philippe Wittenbergh, by using @media screen, we can tar

Re: [css-d] The white-space property between blocks

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > 16.6.1 "The 'white-space' processing model" provides the answer > > (second list) Are you saying then, about whitespace between blocks, that: 1. Whitespace between blocks is l

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > re: > > > > Either way, are the content blocks logically and practically grouped and > related? > > > Not for me. But then there are stranger folks than me that crawl the planet. Sometimes I even have to walk around them. In New York

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andy B. wrote: > re: > Either way, are the content blocks logically and practically grouped and > related? There is a logic and grouping. It is just not one I would have chosen. I would have suggested the main page content to

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

re: >Now it is no longer rail to rail. Min/max width are now being honored. Expected result. >My /off-the-wall guess/ is that the markup is not in the correct order. Probably not. I still have 2 boxes (user 3 and user 4 as the template defines them unused.

Re: [css-d] Safari 'overlabel' absolute position problem

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Eystein Alnaes wrote: > Hi, > I'm using the jQuery version ( > http://scott.sauyet.com/thoughts/archives/2007/03/31/overlabel-with-jquery/) > of the overlabel.js script from A List Appart ( > http://www.alistapart.com/articles/makingcompactformsmoreaccessible). > >

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > It is entirely different now than it was when I looked at it last night. > Last night the width of the outermost wrapper was honored. And, other > than that the type was teeny-tiny/itty-bitty, the positioning of the > various content blocks seemed to make sense. > > As of this wr

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > Take another look now. The only thing I havent changed at this point from > earlier was the site name written on top of the joomla logo. Hopefully this > one looks a little better. > > > >> re: >> >> >> > > > > It is entirely

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > Andy B. wrote: > >> I posted a while back and asked if you could verify that my page >> layout worked. The page in question is eternityrecords.org/private. >> > > re: > > Sighted, and somewhat sighted, people have rights, too :-) . Hon

Re: [css-d] The white-space property between blocks

On Jul 6, 2010, at 7:55 PM, Christopher Wells wrote: > My questions are as follows: > > * If I use the [CSS white-space property][3] on the ``, should > this be able to preserve the whitespace between block elements (e.g. > between the `` and the ``)? Or is whitespace between blocks > always rem

[css-d] The white-space property between blocks

Is the CSS 'white-space' property supposed to be able to affect the whitespace between block elements? For example, in the document used as an example in "[Whitespace in the DOM][1]" as follows, there is whitespace between the `` and the ``: My Document Header

[css-d] Safari 'overlabel' absolute position problem

Hi, I'm using the jQuery version ( http://scott.sauyet.com/thoughts/archives/2007/03/31/overlabel-with-jquery/) of the overlabel.js script from A List Appart ( http://www.alistapart.com/articles/makingcompactformsmoreaccessible). Hold on - this is a CSS question! I've triggered some weird behaviou

Re: [css-d] Strange 7px indent on Legend only in IE7

Hi John, *:first-child+html simply targets IE7, *html targets IE6 alone. I use an alternative way of doing conditional CSS for IE and its described very well here: [http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/quick-tip-how-to-target-ie6-ie7-and-ie8-uniquely-with-4-characters/] The '/*

Re: [css-d] Strange 7px indent on Legend only in IE7

>John Franks wrote: >I have a strange IE7 css problem, where the slim tags with their >green backgrounds on this page >http://www.mrskibbles.co.uk/?page=shop.registration are sitting in >7px in >from the left than they need to be. They should line up with the main >"Register" at the top of t