Re: [css-d] site design/layout feedback desired

On 2010/08/24 20:21 (GMT-0700) Francesco composed: > Looking for feedback on a design I'm almost done with. Don't bother > testing functionality, nothing is active yet except for some simple > validation on the login and register pages. Just click links and let > me know what you think of the lo

Re: [css-d] site design/layout feedback desired

Francesco wrote: Looking for feedback on a design I'm almost done with. http://blackcoil.com/classychild -- Francesco Sanfilippo, Blackcoil Productions Not exactly my kind of thing, but nevertheless I did not see any particular problem with it, Francesco. O.K. in Mac OS X 10.4. Mac F

[css-d] site design/layout feedback desired

Looking for feedback on a design I'm almost done with. Don't bother testing functionality, nothing is active yet except for some simple validation on the login and register pages. Just click links and let me know what you think of the look and feel. FYI - the only product right now is under Baby

[css-d] kthings 02 (Formerly "Floating images -understanding ...etc.)

Re David Hucklesby's reply: First, thanks for the image citation advice. >> And the navigation on the left: Somehow I have to make that fit the >> available space. What to do? >Why not give it more space? This end, I have very long line lengths on >the main text - shorter would be easier to read

Re: [css-d] Web Safe Fonts

On 2010/08/24 20:03 (GMT+0200) Wesley Acheson composed: > Are we still limited to 7 or so web safe fonts? I think the list mom would call this off topic, and better asked on the WD list. http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-CombinedResults.shtml gives an idea how much of what is out

Re: [css-d] Web Safe Fonts

Wesley Acheson wrote: Hi All, Are we still limited to 7 or so web safe fonts? I'm a little bored of some of these. What are good fonts supported by the majority of browsers on the majority of operating systems? Wes No, I don't think so, although as for myself I am limited by my ima

Re: [css-d] Web Safe Fonts

Without tricks - yes it's still pretty limited. Tricks: -- http://typekit.com http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/quick-tip-google-fonts-api-youre-going-to-love-this/ http://wiki.novemberborn.net/sifr/What+is+sIFR Good luck On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Wesley Ach

[css-d] Web Safe Fonts

Hi All, Are we still limited to 7 or so web safe fonts? I'm a little bored of some of these. What are good fonts supported by the majority of browsers on the majority of operating systems? Wes __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-dis

Re: [css-d] Playing with CSS3 transitions

Alan Gresley wrote: The other is of a drop menu. A browser that does not support transition would use the normal method of hiding sub-menus with ap. and a browser that supports transitions would use height: 0 and height: auto on hover (Just like in your demo).

Re: [css-d] Stumped on font style

David Laakso wrote: Bill Braun wrote: I am adapting a Word Press style to integrate a blog into my web site. I have just about everything except the top navigation font style. This is the reference style: http://basicbusinesssim.com/ This is the blog page I am trying to match: http://www.bas

Re: [css-d] Stumped on font style

Bill Braun wrote: I am adapting a Word Press style to integrate a blog into my web site. I have just about everything except the top navigation font style. This is the reference style: http://basicbusinesssim.com/ This is the blog page I am trying to match: http://www.basicbusinesssim.com/bbsim

[css-d] Stumped on font style

I am adapting a Word Press style to integrate a blog into my web site. I have just about everything except the top navigation font style. This is the reference style: http://basicbusinesssim.com/ This is the blog page I am trying to match: http://www.basicbusinesssim.com/bbsimblog/ Note that

Re: [css-d] Playing with CSS3 transitions

Tim Climis wrote: On Monday, August 23, 2010 6:51:34 pm Tim Climis wrote: I'm going to play a little more, but then I'll put up some demos. Okay, so I wrote up what I had at 7:00 this evening. But what I've gotten since then is pretty nifty. Unfortunately, it's almost 1:00am, so it'll have

Re: [css-d] iPad font rendering in both orientations...

On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > Somewhat confused (not being an i- owner/user); > if you read your e-mail on an I-pad (as I know can > be done : I saw it done this weekend), can you not > then just "click" (or whatever the i-equivalent is : > "jab" ?) on an e

Re: [css-d] iPad font rendering in both orientations...

tedd wrote: I have one suggestion, however, if you want iPad owners to review a page, how about giving us something easier to type? The url "vze26m98.net/css-discuss/test-ipad.html" is a lot to type. Somewhat confused (not being an i- owner/user); if you read your e-mail on an I-pad (as I kn

Re: [css-d] iPad font rendering in both orientations...

It turns out that my problem appears unrelated, however. If you can view this page on an iPad in landscape and portrait mode, you'll see the phenomenon: The black-on-white text appears to preserve its thickness, while the white-on-black type ap