Re: [css-d] strange IEX behaviour

2010-12-18 Thread Chetan Crasta
> My website looks fine except in IEX where behaves strange: > http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/ The whole page is a mess. The CSS has got numerous errors and you have used tables for layout. I have rebuilt the page with valid and semantic code: http://roughtech.com/t/fusionticket.html http://roughte

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread David McGlone
On Saturday, December 18, 2010 02:21:05 am G.Sørtun wrote: > On 18.12.2010 06:13, David McGlone wrote: > >> http://99.90.129.247 > >> and I'm having a problem with the text in the header not positioning > >> correctly. I'm wondering if for any reason it's something I have done. I > >> have validate

Re: [css-d] strange IEX behaviour

2010-12-18 Thread Thijs Hakkenberg
I've fixed with css validation :) Thanks! On 18-12-2010 2:36, Claude Needham wrote: On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Thijs Hakkenberg wrote: Dear list, My website looks fine except in IEX where behaves strange: http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/ Anyone know why? A CSS issue? Yes, it does behav

Re: [css-d] strange IEX behaviour

2010-12-18 Thread David Laakso
On 12/18/10 10:33 AM, Thijs Hakkenberg wrote: I've fixed with css validation :) http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/ Validating the markup might be a nice touch...:-) . Best, ~d http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread G.Sørtun
What is your technique for checking this aspect? What I do other than using browswerlab and browswershots, is to change the resolution on my monitor. I also hold down ctrl and +, to enlarge the font to see how it looks. Are these proven methods? New browsers can zoom whole pages, and that'

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/12/18 10:43 (GMT-0500) "G.Sørtun" composed: New browsers can zoom whole pages, and that's enough to test for regular window-size weaknesses. Most new browsers also have one or more forms of font resizing, and that's usually enough to test for such resizing weaknesses. 1: I always tes

Re: [css-d] strange IEX behaviour

2010-12-18 Thread JWN
Thijs Hakkenberg wrote: Dear list, My website looks fine except in IEX where behaves strange: http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/ Anyone know why? A CSS issue? I don't know if this is a CSS issue or not. As others have pointed out, you need to validate and correct many of the markup errors foun

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread G.Sørtun
On 18.12.2010 17:37, Felix Miata wrote: Note that the impact of 32px minimum font size (or 24px, which is not in fact the Firefox limit) and setting the browser's default to 32px (or 24px, which can be larger in Firefox via about:config) cannot be expected to have equivalent impact, particula

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/12/18 12:15 (GMT-0500) "G.Sørtun" composed: Felix Miata wrote: Note that the impact of 32px minimum font size (or 24px, which is not in fact the Firefox limit) and setting the browser's default to 32px (or 24px, which can be larger in Firefox via about:config) cannot be expected t

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread David Laakso
On 12/18/10 12:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Felix Miata wrote: I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers for text content. Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both vertically and horizontally in order to read a scaled web page, either.

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/12/18 13:06 (GMT-0500) David Laakso composed: Felix Miata wrote: I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers for text content. Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both vertically and horizontally in order to read a scaled web page,

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread Thierry Koblentz
> >> Felix Miata wrote: > > I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers > > for text content. > > > > Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both > vertically and horizontally in order to read a scaled web page, either. fwiw, I prefer increasing tex

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread Chris F.A. Johnson
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Felix Miata wrote: On 2010/12/18 13:06 (GMT-0500) David Laakso composed: Felix Miata wrote: I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers for text content. Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both vertically and horizo

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/12/18 14:07 (GMT-0500) Chris F.A. Johnson composed: Felix Miata wrote: as if horizontal scroll was _always_ equivalent to torture. Not always; only 99.9% of the time. When pigs fly will anyone convince me that be true. Every page I actually read, as opposed to open to view

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Dec 19, 2010, at 2:15 AM, G.Sørtun wrote: > Question: is 'font-size-adjust' well enough supported across browser-land > today to be of any use? Gecko 1.9.0+ only (Firefox 3.0+, Camino 2.0+, ...) Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ ___

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

2010-12-18 Thread G.Sørtun
Gecko 1.9.0+ only (Firefox 3.0+, Camino 2.0+, ...) Hmm, no real improvement over the last few years then. That's too bad. Georg __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/