Gecko 1.9.0+ only (Firefox 3.0+, Camino 2.0+, ...)
Hmm, no real improvement over the last few years then. That's too bad.
Georg
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Dec 19, 2010, at 2:15 AM, G.Sørtun wrote:
> Question: is 'font-size-adjust' well enough supported across browser-land
> today to be of any use?
Gecko 1.9.0+ only (Firefox 3.0+, Camino 2.0+, ...)
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
___
On 2010/12/18 14:07 (GMT-0500) Chris F.A. Johnson composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
as if horizontal scroll was _always_ equivalent to torture.
Not always; only 99.9% of the time.
When pigs fly will anyone convince me that be true. Every page I actually
read, as opposed to open to view
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2010/12/18 13:06 (GMT-0500) David Laakso composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers
for text content.
Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both
vertically and horizo
> >> Felix Miata wrote:
> > I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers
> > for text content.
>
>
>
> Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both
> vertically and horizontally in order to read a scaled web page, either.
fwiw, I prefer increasing tex
On 2010/12/18 13:06 (GMT-0500) David Laakso composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers
for text content.
Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both
vertically and horizontally in order to read a scaled web page,
On 12/18/10 12:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
I stand firm that px is an inappropriate unit for sizing containers
for text content.
Not everyone in the universe is thrilled at having to scroll both
vertically and horizontally in order to read a scaled web page, either.
On 2010/12/18 12:15 (GMT-0500) "G.Sørtun" composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
Note that the impact of 32px minimum font size (or 24px, which is not
in fact the Firefox limit) and setting the browser's default to 32px
(or 24px, which can be larger in Firefox via about:config) cannot be
expected t
On 18.12.2010 17:37, Felix Miata wrote:
Note that the impact of 32px minimum font size (or 24px, which is not
in fact the Firefox limit) and setting the browser's default to 32px
(or 24px, which can be larger in Firefox via about:config) cannot be
expected to have equivalent impact, particula
Thijs Hakkenberg wrote:
Dear list,
My website looks fine except in IEX where behaves strange:
http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/
Anyone know why? A CSS issue?
I don't know if this is a CSS issue or not. As others have pointed out, you
need to validate and correct many of the markup errors foun
On 2010/12/18 10:43 (GMT-0500) "G.Sørtun" composed:
New browsers can zoom whole pages, and that's enough to test for
regular window-size weaknesses. Most new browsers also have one or more
forms of font resizing, and that's usually enough to test for such
resizing weaknesses.
1: I always tes
What is your technique for checking this aspect? What I do other than
using browswerlab and browswershots, is to change the resolution on
my monitor. I also hold down ctrl and +, to enlarge the font to see
how it looks. Are these proven methods?
New browsers can zoom whole pages, and that'
On 12/18/10 10:33 AM, Thijs Hakkenberg wrote:
I've fixed with css validation :)
http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/
Validating the markup might be a nice touch...:-) .
Best,
~d
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
__
css-discuss
I've fixed with css validation :)
Thanks!
On 18-12-2010 2:36, Claude Needham wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Thijs Hakkenberg wrote:
Dear list,
My website looks fine except in IEX where behaves strange:
http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/
Anyone know why? A CSS issue?
Yes, it does behav
On Saturday, December 18, 2010 02:21:05 am G.Sørtun wrote:
> On 18.12.2010 06:13, David McGlone wrote:
> >> http://99.90.129.247
> >> and I'm having a problem with the text in the header not positioning
> >> correctly. I'm wondering if for any reason it's something I have done. I
> >> have validate
> My website looks fine except in IEX where behaves strange:
> http://kunstomhetlijf.nl/res2/
The whole page is a mess. The CSS has got numerous errors and you have
used tables for layout. I have rebuilt the page with valid and
semantic code:
http://roughtech.com/t/fusionticket.html
http://roughte
16 matches
Mail list logo
