On 31/03/2011 6:38 AM, Bob Rosenberg wrote:
At 16:49 +0100 on 03/30/2011, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote
about [css-d] Erratum:
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Surely the goal is to write fully conformant documents that
render reliably (if not necessarily consistently) in all
Hello
Some days ago I encountered that Firefox 4 and Google Chrome implement
the resize property:
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ui/#resizing
They default the textarea element to resize:both, which is IMO a nice
usability boost. Now there are websites such as Facebook that use
scripting to
Alan Gresley wrote:
With this statement, the inability of browser vendors to comply with
W3C specifications. I can assure that the total reverse is true.
The greatest change regarding CSS is the extensive work in re-writing
various parts of the CSS2.1 specs to match current browser
On 31/03/2011 2:01 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
So I guess, in essence the answer is NO you cannot begin a class or
ID name with numeric characters?
The answer is no. Isn't the css2.1 spec clear enough ?
On 31/03/2011 6:27 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
Hello Barney, Marc and Bob,
I should have said Bob. Apologies barney and Marc.
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
__
On 31 March 2011 11:21, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote:
This is not correct. You can begin ID and class selectors with numbers. The
only thing is that they must be encoded properly with characters escapes
(the above spec gives details).
Very cunning stuff!
On Mar 31, 2011, at 12:09
Alan Gresley wrote:
The answer is no. Isn't the css2.1 spec clear enough ?
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#characters
This is not correct. You can begin ID and class selectors with numbers.
The only thing is that they must be encoded properly with characters
escapes (the above spec
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
It will take me some time to decide by looking at the formal
parts of the specification whether Alan is correct in his assertion;
perhaps others more familiar with the formal syntax can save
time by answering and/or pointing us at the rule(s)
On 31 March 2011 11:38, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
The specification says they cannot start with a digit; Alan says
they can start with numbers; the question is therefore are there
numbers that are not digits, and Alan is arguing yes, if the
number is encoded
Hello,
I'm trying to create reusable buttons.
Currently I've already defined the button itself and some color classes.
I'm trying to implement some icon classes such as .plus .min etc.
The problem is that the color classes all have a linear gradient as background
and I'm trying to place the
Am 31.03.2011 13:12 schrieb Barney Carroll:
But even from that angle, can this be considered good practice? Isn't
it contrary to the specification's intentions in forbidding digit-led
identifiers using the standard methods? Would you genuinely suggest
this advice to the OP, or is this purely an
Markus Ernst wrote:
I could imagine a hypothetic Web application that generates class names
from any other information, which may start with a digit. Thus class
names may not even be known at coding time. In that case, escaping all
digits might be a valuable alternative.
Far simpler would
On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Barney Carroll wrote:
A simpler question, that has still yet to be answered, is why
digit-led class or id identifiers are banned in the first place. Alan,
Phil — any ideas?
HTML 4 has / had this:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-name
(linked from
Hiya Jonas,
Came up against this exact problem earlier this month.
The effect you're describing is possible under the W3 spec, but
(perhaps because CSS3 gradients are currently only supported in
vendor-prefixed-syntax implementation, ie not production-ready
according to the developers) the only
On 31 March 2011 13:49, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
I could imagine a hypothetic Web application that generates class names from
any other information, which may start with a digit. Thus class names may
not even be known at coding time. In that case, escaping all digits might be
a
5.04 + at least) and Opera
11.10b.
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/cssD-20110331.html
Granted, it is a bit convoluted, but it does work according to the spec. And
granted, for complex stylesheets in the example you give, it is currently not
really usable, unless you use some kind of of pre-processor
On 31 March 2011 14:43, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Barney Carroll wrote:
You can do that in webkit based browsers (Safari 5.04 + at least) and Opera
11.10b.
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/cssD-20110331.html
No idea what I was doing wrong
On 1/04/2011 12:31 AM, Barney Carroll wrote:
On 31 March 2011 13:49, Markus Ernstderer...@gmx.ch wrote:
I could imagine a hypothetic Web application that generates class names from
any other information, which may start with a digit. Thus class names may
not even be known at coding time. In
On 31 March 2011 15:49, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote:
If you're dealing with a web app that procedurally generates
identifiers beginning with digits and you have to support IE6-7,
you've probably got bigger things to worry about ;)
Are you sure.
Not really — it's a hypothetical
am running into a problem when i hover over a top-level link (drop-down
appears) and click the top level link to visit a new page. when i return (back
button), the hover state is still on until i move away from the back button. i
guess it's due to caching. any css way to keep this from
Short answer to this one.
On 1/04/2011 2:14 AM, Barney Carroll wrote:
http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/identifiers-character-encoding2.htm
Is the update for the generated content tests?
Did you not the 2nd, 3rd and 4th test. If an ID was like this
'id=' the following would all
258KB is pretty large for a BG image. Saving as a medium jpg in PS, brings
it down to 15KB with acceptable quality.
http://i.imgur.com/WPVSm.jpg
Kevin
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Sandy sfeld...@sympatico.ca wrote:
hey all,
I have a problem in ie that I hope you can help with
Sandy wrote:
hey all,
I have a problem in ie that I hope you can help with
http://burlmannconstruction.com/test/
http://burlmannconstruction.com/test/css/burlmann.css
the client is bothered by how the site comes up. Sometimes the
background image loads right away, other times you see a flash
258KB is pretty large for a BG image. Saving as a medium jpg in PS,
brings it down to 15KB with acceptable quality.
http://i.imgur.com/WPVSm.jpg
Kevin,
thanks a million! I have just replaced the background image with the one
you posted.
best regards, and THANK YOU
Sandy
I have a problem in ie...
Which version of IE? Although, I am fairly certain you will say IE 6 because
you mentioned seeing a gray square. For this I recommend:
http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/
Thank you,
Marc Hall
HallMarc Websites
http://burlmannconstruction.com/test/
http://burlmannconstruction.com/test/css/burlmann.css
Hmm, try Google up flash of unstyled content? That's what it sounds
like to me.
well, it's not really unstyled. It's just missing that 20px margin.
http://bluerobot.com/web/css/fouc.asp/
and
Which version of IE? Although, I am fairly certain you will say IE 6 because
you mentioned seeing a gray square. For this I recommend:
http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/
it's ie7.
Marc, at the risk of sounding a bit thick, this looks like a link to a
script that fixes
I don't know why this works. And I don't know why it doesn't.
I've always heard it as canon that you can't border a table row like: tr
{border:1px solid black}, and I've accepted it. BUT.
Why does this work in Firefox [3.6.13]: (I just sort of stumbled over it,
and I take no credit for
Your answer is in this pdf file:
http://tinyurl.com/5t7sxcb this link leads to:
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/dreamweaver/pdfs/bk_getting_started_css_ch09.pdf
hth
I don't know why this works. And I don't know why it doesn't.
I've always heard it as
I think this is acceptable and expected behaviour, and not something that
needs to be 'fixed'. But to each their own... :)
Kevin
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:20 AM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.comwrote:
On 3/30/11 12:57 AM, Markus Ernst wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 09:25 schrieb PL:
Bob,
I am fascinated by today's google animation of Robert Bunsen's lab. I have been
studying the page source for quite awhile but I am unable to make much sense of
it.
Could someone explain a little bit about how css is used in this page to create
this effect?
Thank you,
Patrice
On Mar 31, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
Updated test case.
http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/identifiers-character-encoding2.htm
fwiw, when validating the stylesheet, I get the following 2 errors:
.\3 Value Error : background #\0030\0066\0030 is not a valid color 3
On Apr 1, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Brian King wrote:
I don't know why this works. And I don't know why it doesn't.
I've always heard it as canon that you can't border a table row like: tr
{border:1px solid black}, and I've accepted it. BUT.
Why does this work in Firefox [3.6.13]: (I just
It is not the CSS that is doing it but scripts. The page has two scripts and 3
lots of style sheets. I can post these here if you want but I think this would
not be tolerated here.
The best way to analyze a page is to view it in Firefox with this Add-On
34 matches
Mail list logo
