On 7/20/11 6:04 PM, Debbie Campbell wrote:
I changed it, it didn't make a difference...
--
Debbie
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/paramaya/wgs/dish-network-services/
.copyright {
padding: 0 0 20px;/*<- :: delete and/or tweak::---*/
}
Btw, top-posting screws up the
I changed it, it didn't make a difference...
--
Debbie
On 7/20/2011 1:35 PM, Maujor (via-gmail) wrote:
In this page:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/paramaya/wgs/dish-network-services/
There's a large image background to footer-container (not yet
completed). There's a small space o
On 7/20/11 10:39 AM, David Laakso wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:46 PM, Debbie Campbell wrote:
In this page:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/paramaya/wgs/dish-network-services/
There's a large image background to footer-container (not yet
completed). There's a small space of about 9px tall b
In this page:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/paramaya/wgs/dish-network-services/
There's a large image background to footer-container (not yet completed).
There's a small space of about 9px tall below the bottom of
footer-container at the very bottom of the browser window, I'm not su
On 7/20/11 12:46 PM, Debbie Campbell wrote:
In this page:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/paramaya/wgs/dish-network-services/
There's a large image background to footer-container (not yet
completed). There's a small space of about 9px tall below the bottom
of footer-container at th
In this page:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/paramaya/wgs/dish-network-services/
There's a large image background to footer-container (not yet
completed). There's a small space of about 9px tall below the bottom of
footer-container at the very bottom of the browser window, I'm not s
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2011 2:29 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>> I'm not going anywhere, but you have a point. Some people seem to be
>> disproportionately upset by the topic.
>
> The reason that text is used is mainly due to security issues and encoding
> (m
At 12:25 +0900 7/20/11, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
I'm surprised the listmom hasn't called a halt to this discussion yet.
Even the listmom has to sleep sometime. Generally, the nights
when he goes to bed early and wakes up late [which, with three
children including an infant, are insane
On 20/07/2011 2:29 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
I'm not going anywhere, but you have a point. Some people seem to be
disproportionately upset by the topic.
The reason that text is used is mainly due to security issues and
encoding (mono-space). My email client is permanently set to only show
text an
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Mark Henderson wrote:
>
> On 20 July 2011 11:59, Ghodmode wrote:
> > Okay, so I change my email settings every time I send to CSS-discuss
> > so that it's plain-text, but I have to ask... why?
>
> In case you haven't already noticed, you are going to get *flamed*
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:12:26 pm Ghodmode wrote:
> Ya I shouldn't have said "there aren't any", but I was hoping someone
> would comment with the name of one that doesn't. No one has yet...
> Not even you.
> What's "TA-ships"?
Teaching assistantships. Any grad student teaching a class, wh
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 12:59:45 AM, Ghodmode wrote:
> There aren't any contemporary email applications that can't handle HTML. Is
> anyone using one?
---
Er.. I am. At least, I'm using an email client that doesn't by default
render HTML (it also doesn't retrieve external resources such as
FWIW, I think that Ghodmode has every right to ask
why HTML e-mails are prohibited on this list, even
though I personally rejoice that they are. I also
appreciate the non-confrontational way in which he
has presented his views and responded to the view of
others. However. In my e-mail client (S
13 matches
Mail list logo