On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:17 PM, Kathy Wheeler wrote:
A couple of thoughts: unless the image is photographic, avoid jpg.
Either gif or png will be more reliable to match with the CSS
colour codes (might have to post-process the png thou). jpg may not
keep the exact colour value you are after w
On 08/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, John wrote:
> wrangling color issues here. sometimes working in gimp, sometimes in
> photoshop. noticing colors aren't matching up tho they be picked by their
> number and not by eye.
Do you mean the image colorpicker rbg values don't match their css equivalent
rende
On 8/11/11 6:24 PM, John wrote:
wrangling color issues here. sometimes working in gimp, sometimes in
photoshop. noticing colors aren't matching up tho they be picked by
their number and not by eye.
some say Safari doesn't like jpgs whose color profile has been removed
but that removing the co
On 8/11/11 3:44 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
PS I redesigned my web site, in case anyone is interested:
http://www.rorybernstein.com
So far so good.
"Lets play..."
1/ Stress test.
2/ Fold and hold tablets and mobile.
Best,
Antonio Banderas
--Desparado
_
wrangling color issues here. sometimes working in gimp, sometimes in
photoshop. noticing colors aren't matching up tho they be picked by
their number and not by eye.
some say Safari doesn't like jpgs whose color profile has been
removed but that removing the color profile is the way to have
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Tindle, Terri wrote:
> I'm so sorry - obviously I have been thrown in way over my head. I am trying
> to change the action buttons on the right side of the page & can't figure out
> what else I need to do to get the image to show up. All I did is change the
>
I'm so sorry - obviously I have been thrown in way over my head. I am trying
to change the action buttons on the right side of the page & can't figure out
what else I need to do to get the image to show up. All I did is change the
image name and it disappeared.
http://ago.mo.gov/index3.php
T
> Upon doing that, the background and wrapper div seem to be where they
> ought to be. Now I need to figure out where the missing footer has
> gotten to.
> D'oh!
Removing the "position:relative;" from the .footer seemed to do the trick.
(Not even sure why I had that in there at this point.)
_
> That is odd. You do have an empty second .sidebarR in there, which is
> below the .content and first .sidebarR. Not sure if that would do it,
> but appears needless anyway.
>
> Also, could you just have your content be in an h and a p as opposed to
> 2 separate tables? Just curious.
The site is
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Tindle, Terri wrote:
> I took over a very complex website from a web designer. I'm trying to use
> her template to build a new page. The only issue is that in resolution 800 x
> 600, the main image goes off the page. To be honest, she is using at least 6
> di
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Tindle, Terri wrote:
> I took over a very complex website from a web designer. I'm trying to use
> her template to build a new page. The only issue is that in resolution 800 x
> 600, the main image goes off the page. To be honest, she is using at least 6
> di
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Rob Emenecker
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I've got an issue with Internet Exploder 7 showing a DIV underneath of the
> sibling DIVs that it is supposed to be a wrapper for, and I'm not quite sure
> where/how to fix it. The page works fine in IE8/9 and FF3.x+ (as well
I took over a very complex website from a web designer. I'm trying to use her
template to build a new page. The only issue is that in resolution 800 x 600,
the main image goes off the page. To be honest, she is using at least 6
different css sheets and I don't even know where to start. Is it
Hi all,
I've got an issue with Internet Exploder 7 showing a DIV underneath of the
sibling DIVs that it is supposed to be a wrapper for, and I'm not quite sure
where/how to fix it. The page works fine in IE8/9 and FF3.x+ (as well as
Chrome and Safari).
The page is on an access restricted si
Hello CSS fans,
http://rorybernstein.com/slider/vertical_center
I have this test page here. Two problems:
1. In the slider (orange box at top), the content on the right side of the box
does not show up in Chrome, but it does in FireFox. Meaning, the photo moves
across as it should, but there i
11.08.2011 18:09, Claude Needham wrote:
I've been meaning to ask, how robust is the cross-browser
compatibility of the "+" feature?
The main issue is lack of any support on IE 6. The impact of this issue
is of course diminishing. But if you wish to get the effect on IE 6,
too, you need to us
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Tim Climis wrote:
>> The 2nd paragraph ("The principal areas ... ) has had a 0 margin
>> applied, but still displays a gap.
>>
>
> Because that's an OL (not a UL). The CSS isn't selecting them. You
> can edit it like this:
>
> p { margin-bottom: 0}
> p + ul, p +
> The 2nd paragraph ("The principal areas ... ) has had a 0 margin
> applied, but still displays a gap.
>
Because that's an OL (not a UL). The CSS isn't selecting them. You
can edit it like this:
p { margin-bottom: 0}
p + ul, p + ol { margin-top: 0}
p + ul + li, p + ol + li {margin-top: 0}
--
I've put a symptomatic page on our website:
http://www.fits.uk.com/test/D18001.htm
The 2nd paragraph ("The principal areas ... ) has had a 0 margin
applied, but still displays a gap.
It works great in the yellow boxes (tables) in the second box down in
the column "Competence" after the end
Cheers Tim - it worked great, problem solved - many thanks, Dixie
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- htt
> Does anyone know how to reproduce it properly, please?
p { margin-bottom: 0}
p + ul { margin-top: 0}
p + ul + li {margin-top: 0}
What IE is doing (it seems) is putting the UL inside the paragraph,
rather than outside the paragraph. So the default margins for
paragraphs and lists are taking eff
I notice that in IE if you leave the tag off the end of a paragraph
immediately before a bulleted list, that the list will be up hard
against the previous paragraph (i.e. with no space between the paragraph
and the first item of the bulleted list. It doesn't of course work in
FF as that displays
22 matches
Mail list logo
