Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

Hi Georg! Thanks again for the help! Much appreciated. :) On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Georg wrote: > IE8 and older don't support @mediaqueries with min/max arguments in any > form, so they are shut out anyway and will need "a backdoor entry" or other > workaround. Cool! Thanks for the conf

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

On 16.07.2012 04:12, Micky Hulse wrote: I was just reading the docs at w3.org: "The keyword 'only' can also be used to hide style sheets from older user agents. User agents must process media queries starting with 'only' as if the 'only' keyword was not present. " Hmmm, based on that info, if I

[css-d] Same vertical outline text with text behind it

Dear all, I just started working on a new site and I wondered about the following: I've a main title ("Sergio da Silva") and an additional title ("Flamenco guitar"). Within the title section, I want the outlined left, the right so I put the as inline elements behind each other. Now I wonder

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > Hmmm, maybe I missed it in the w3.org docs, but I wonder why there's > not an "or" operator? I guess the comma kinda behaves like an OR operator. No? __ css-discuss [css-d@lis

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

Hi again! On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > It might be, but then, maybe not. > What if you don't want your media query to affect media="print" ? Hmmm, good point. In this case, I don't. :D > (quality printing from a web browser is still an exercise in craziness...)

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

Le 16 juil. 2012 à 10:18, Micky Hulse a écrit : > ... is it just me, or does "only screen" feel like overkill? It might be, but then, maybe not. What if you don't want your media query to affect media="print" ? (quality printing from a web browser is still an exercise in craziness…) But you're

Re: [css-d] Public list archives...

Hi Philippe! Thanks again for the reply, I really appreciate it! On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > I've no idea what happens there. You'd have to ask the people at Incutio > (hosting that archive for free). Maybe a cronjob has gone bad. Yah, kinda looks like somethi

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

Hi Philippe! Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it. On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > And those will work on a Retina MBP, fwiw. Awesome. Thanks for checking! :) > Correct, the 'min' stands for minimum, thus anything that is equal to > 1.5 or higher. Great! T

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

On 16.07.2012 02:44, Micky Hulse wrote: The rules are just for the sake of dividing the s with s that will show if the min-device-pixel-ratio is 1.5 or above. If you view that page with an iPhone 4 (for example) you should see 3 black boxes appear with white paragraph text. FYI: I ran your t

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

Hi David! On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:40 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Not sure what you are testing since the page has no content. Doh, sorry for the bad example I provided (or, at least I should've provided an explanation of what I was testing). The rules are just for the sake of dividing the s wit

Re: [css-d] Responsive images not scaling down

On 16.07.2012 00:51, Gates, Jeff wrote: Thanks Georg. I can see what you're saying. And I started to play around with increasing the side div percentages. However, what I'd like to maintain is a somewhat narrow middle column for the text (I'd like the text to be more vertical than horizontal a

Re: [css-d] Public list archives...

Le 16 juil. 2012 à 04:54, Micky Hulse a écrit : > Just curious, is there a reason why the public list archives stop in > March of 2012? > > > > I'd like to link to a thread for documentation purposes. I've no idea what happens there. You'd h

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

Le 16 juil. 2012 à 06:42, Micky Hulse a écrit : > > > Hope that helps. > > All three media queries (view source on demo page) work for retina > display iPhone… And those will work on a Retina MBP, fwiw. > > I assume the "min" part of "min-device-pixel-ratio" means t

Re: [css-d] Responsive images not scaling down

From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Georg [gunla...@c2i.net] Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 6:38 PM To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] Responsive images not scaling down On 15.07.2012

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > Hi David! > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:01 PM, David Laakso > wrote: >> A clickable link to your test page[s] in your post to the list could >> be a nice touch. > > Doh, sorry! :) > > Here you go: > > > Micky Not

Re: [css-d] Responsive images not scaling down

On 15.07.2012 23:45, Gates, Jeff wrote: Can someone tell me why the images aren't scaling down? Thanks. Images scale fine - never wider than 100% of their containers, but with only 22% width left for the "center column" the layout doesn't force image scaling until page is so narrow that cent

[css-d] Responsive images not scaling down

Two images on a page don't seem to be resizing as they should when I reduce the viewport. The page in question is http://www.outtacontext.com/wp2/about/past7/ I have a three column layout on this page with images in the left div and the right div. Text is in the middle div. I have a max-width:10

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

Hi David! On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:01 PM, David Laakso wrote: > A clickable link to your test page[s] in your post to the list could > be a nice touch. Doh, sorry! :) Here you go: Hope that helps. All three media queries (view source on demo page) work for retina d

Re: [css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > Correct? A clickable link to your test page[s] in your post to the list could be a nice touch. Best, David Laakso -- Chelsea Creek Studio http://ccstudi.com __ css-discu

[css-d] A few question about this media query (for retina display)...

1. Will this media query: "mq-1.5.css" ... also work on devices that have a device pixel ratio of 2? (From my tests, it appears to work... I don't have a 1.5 ratio device to test on though.) In other words, I shouldn't have to do this: "mq-2.0

[css-d] Public list archives...

Just curious, is there a reason why the public list archives stop in March of 2012? I'd like to link to a thread for documentation purposes. Thanks! Micky __ css-discuss [css

Re: [css-d] Float 100% width, do I need clear:both?

Correction: On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > Interestingly enough, IIRC, if #stuff has "clear:both", and > there's a "float:right" preceding it, then everything works great... > "clear:both" fails if the the float above is floated right. That should say: ... and there's a

Re: [css-d] Float 100% width, do I need clear:both?

Hi David and Georg, many thanks for you replies and help, I really appreciate the pro assistance. :) > A clickable link to the specific page in question to the list is > always to your advantage. Or, is it? Doh! Sorry about that. I actually do have a demo page, but for some reason I didn't post

Re: [css-d] Float 100% width, do I need clear:both?

On 14.07.2012 21:47, Micky Hulse wrote: Silly question: Is there such a thing as a silly question? > Just curious (mostly wanting confirmation): Is it true that > clear:both is superfluous if the div that needs to clear previous > floats has a 100% width? Is there a situation/browser that mig

Re: [css-d] Centering Tips Please

>Don't know if there is a better option. > > Best, > Brian I don't know if there is a better option, either... But some alternative options may, or may not, be to: 1/ set the block as a traditional table 2/ set the block as a CSS table Best, David Laakso -- Chelsea Creek Studio http://

Re: [css-d] Float 100% width, do I need clear:both?

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > Hi, > > Silly question: Nah. Good question! A clickable link to the specific page in question to the list is always to your advantage. Or, is it? Best, David Laakso -- Chelsea Creek Studio http://ccstudi.com