Re: [css-d] Browser compatability

2013-06-12 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
Le 13 juin 2013 à 02:04, csimpson a écrit : > have an issue figuring out why the menu is moving when i test it in chrome! > > As displayed here in firefox its set fine > http://www.flickr.com/photos/92511398@N03/9024884789/ > > but however when tested in chrome it jumps up > http://www.flic

Re: [css-d] How best to revise my style sheet? Reverse it?

2013-06-12 Thread Keith Purtell
I've already started working with the suggestions that were provided. Many thanks. -Keith __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incu

[css-d] Good evening!

2013-06-12 Thread mel myers
http://www.patrickimbert.com/lwcrzcpnh.php __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/poli

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

2013-06-12 Thread Frank Taylor
Your one and only caveat is IE7: if there are HTML comments between the divs, then the adjacent sibling selector doesn't work. In the one case where our CMS was kicking out comments, I reverted to the non-adjacent selector: >> .wrap div ~ div ~ div {margin-right:0;} Mind you, if you're deal

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

2013-06-12 Thread Tom Livingston
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Frank Taylor wrote: > In your exact use case,I've solved the problem by using the adjacent sibling > selector. More than three items and I consider things a little too messy; > I'll revert to JS or helper classes for more than three items: > > >> >> .wrap div{

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

2013-06-12 Thread Frank Taylor
In your exact use case,I've solved the problem by using the adjacent sibling selector. More than three items and I consider things a little too messy; I'll revert to JS or helper classes for more than three items: > > .wrap div{width: 32%;margin-right:2%;float:left} > .wrap div + div + div {

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

2013-06-12 Thread Tom Livingston
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Frank Taylor wrote: > So far I've only had to really use the :nth-type selectors for tables, and > for creating some demos on layouts. > > When it comes to tables, I'd created an html table-maker that optionally > generates helper classes. > > Outside of tables,

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

2013-06-12 Thread Frank Taylor
So far I've only had to really use the :nth-type selectors for tables, and for creating some demos on layouts. When it comes to tables, I'd created an html table-maker that optionally generates helper classes. Outside of tables, I really haven't had projects that required :nth-child support

Re: [css-d] CSS3 Selectors

2013-06-12 Thread Micky Hulse
Are you using it for anything mission critical? Personally, I let something like that gracefully degrade. Or, looking at: http://caniuse.com/#search=nth- Seems like contemporary browsers have a handle on that. Sometimes I'll just make sure there's an alternative option (or, it degrades gracefully

[css-d] CSS3 Selectors

2013-06-12 Thread Tom Livingston
List, I use selectivizr frequently. Do you use this or something like it? What's your method for dealing with, for example, a lack of support for: p:nth-of-type(3n){ color: red; } TIA! -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 |

Re: [css-d] background displays locally, but not remotely

2013-06-12 Thread Hahnel, Fred (DET-MRM)
Css file not found in Web Developer console http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/stylesheets/floradise.css -Fred Hahnel -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Ron Zisman Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:

Re: [css-d] Browser compatability

2013-06-12 Thread Ron Zisman
thanks guys, the image in the folder used a cap 'i' opposed to 'i'. On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Alex M wrote: > We'd probably have to look at the code to fully examine it, but if its got > sensitive data, for the mean time have you run it through a CSS-validator to > make sure it's error-free?

Re: [css-d] background displays locally, but not remotely

2013-06-12 Thread Tim Arnold
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Ron Zisman wrote: > http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/index.html > > stupidly simple, a background image with 2 links… only the links show (not bg > imgs) > styles in the head of doc. > > thanks in advance > ron The path to the images that do show up: http://r

Re: [css-d] background displays locally, but not remotely

2013-06-12 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
Looks like index.jpg isn't in that folder. 404 not found for me anyways. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Ron Zisman wrote: > http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/index.html > > stupidly simple, a background image with 2 links… only the

[css-d] background displays locally, but not remotely

2013-06-12 Thread Ron Zisman
http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/index.html stupidly simple, a background image with 2 links… only the links show (not bg imgs) styles in the head of doc. thanks in advance ron __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] ht

Re: [css-d] Browser compatability

2013-06-12 Thread Alex M
We'd probably have to look at the code to fully examine it, but if its got sensitive data, for the mean time have you run it through a CSS-validator to make sure it's error-free? ( http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ ) Alex M Sent from my iPad On 12 Jun 2013, at 18:04, csimpson wrote: > Hi Gu

[css-d] Browser compatability

2013-06-12 Thread csimpson
Hi Guys, I have an issue figuring out why the menu is moving when i test it in chrome! As displayed here in firefox its set fine http://www.flickr.com/photos/92511398@N03/9024884789/ but however when tested in chrome it jumps up http://www.flickr.com/photos/92511398@N03/9024885229/ i have sea