Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Le 10 juil. 2013 à 04:46, Karl DeSaulniers a écrit : > >> Take a look at it on a phone browser. I have an iPhone 5 using safari. View >> portrait first then rotate to landscape. The top nav (for me) is overlapping >> the header te

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Chrome on my desktop doesn't cover the header, but the two green buttons get broken into two lines and the third button gets a hyphen put into it. Same with camino, just no hyphen. Same with Sunshine, just no hyphen. Same with firefox, just no hyphen, but it also covers the header. Karl DeSauln

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Le 10 juil. 2013 à 12:59, Karl DeSaulniers a écrit : > Except chrome on iOS 6 does it too. Haven't tested chrome on the desktop, but > I will. Of course. Chrome on iOS uses the exact same rendering engine as Safari. Chrome-up-to-date on desktop should have that bug fixed by the same patch as

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Except chrome on iOS 6 does it too. Haven't tested chrome on the desktop, but I will. Best, Karl Sent from losPhone On Jul 9, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Le 10 juil. 2013 à 04:46, Karl DeSaulniers a écrit : > >> Take a look at it on a phone browser. I have an iPhone

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Le 10 juil. 2013 à 04:46, Karl DeSaulniers a écrit : > Take a look at it on a phone browser. I have an iPhone 5 using safari. View > portrait first then rotate to landscape. The top nav (for me) is overlapping > the header text. It is a bug in Safari 6.0x and the equivalent Mobile Safari on

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Greg Gamble wrote: > Curious on why you placed the Navigation at the bottom of the page? I believe content is king and should precede navigation in the html. > Also, why are you using all of the soft hyphens ... "­" ? Not all of them are necessary but primarily

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Also, if I might suggest on the nav links, placing at least one more space or padding on each side of the text inside the buttons with the shaded backgrounds. The text looks a little crammed in there. But not entirely necessary. Just my opinion. :) Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://de

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Also might want to add to the ul element list-style-type: none; a dics is showing on safari on my desktop Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Same thing happens in safari on my desktop if I grab the right side of

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Curious on why you placed the Navigation at the bottom of the page? Also, why are you using all of the soft hyphens ... "­" ? Greg -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Tuesday, July 09,

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Same thing happens in safari on my desktop if I grab the right side of the browser and shrink the browser window. display: list-tiem on the ul element fixed it for me with inspect element on my desktop. HTH, Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:11

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Or a display: list-item? Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Or a display: list-item? > > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > >> Yes and no. If I load the page as landscape they work, but if I load th

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Yes and no. If I load the page as landscape they work, but if I load the page as portrait and then go to landscape they dont. maybe try a diplay:inline instead of block on the ul Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Jul 9, 2013, at 4:59 PM, David Laakso wrote: > On Tue, Ju

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Take a look.. > > http://designdrumm.com/IMG_0164.PNG > > HTH, > > Best, > > Karl DeSaulniers re: Thanks for the screen shots. I have modified the CSS. Please open in iPhone 5 portrait mode. Rotate to landscape.

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

iOS 6.1.4 - build 10B350 using safari and chrome does same thing. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Jul 9, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Take a look.. > > http://designdrumm.com/IMG_0164.PNG > > HTH, > > Best, > > Karl DeSaulniers > Design Drumm >

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Take a look.. http://designdrumm.com/IMG_0164.PNG HTH, Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Jul 9, 2013, at 4:14 PM, David Laakso wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: >> Take a look at it on a phone browser. I have an iPhone 5 using safa

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Take a look at it on a phone browser. I have an iPhone 5 using safari. View > portrait first then rotate to landscape. The top nav (for me) is overlapping > the header text. > > Best, > Karl >> >> css >>

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

No skip links Heading tags are not in order. You start with an H2, go to an H1, then to an H5 and an H6. Alt tags for images are empty. Do the images have meaning, or are they used for filler? Same image in multiple locations on the same page. Hovering over a link shows a line above the link te

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Same on chrome for iPhone. Best, Karl Sent from losPhone On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Take a look at it on a phone browser. I have an iPhone 5 using safari. View > portrait first then rotate to landscape. The top nav (for me) is overlapping > the header text. > >

Re: [css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Take a look at it on a phone browser. I have an iPhone 5 using safari. View portrait first then rotate to landscape. The top nav (for me) is overlapping the header text. Best, Karl Sent from losPhone On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:53 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Constructive comments and suggestions on

[css-d] site review: hydrogeologist

Constructive comments and suggestions on this responsive layout appreciated. css Best, David Laakso -- Chelsea Creek Studio http://ccstudi.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lis

Re: [css-d] Firefox & the new pixel density ??

Are these issue from setting the zoom with text-only option being checked? I see site layout being busted when zoom is set to text-only, but not when its unchecked. Greg -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf

Re: [css-d] Firefox & the new pixel density ??

On 09/07/2013 02:20, Janet Lynn Ford wrote: 1. Is there a way to target this with media queries (I read that now one can target dpi, but I am curious if any one is doing so, what the problems and/or negative effects of doing so will be. I think this is part of the response to the issue that med

[css-d] firefox not shrinking resized image's container

hi all, i have two floated elements that behave as they should in all browsers except in firefox (20, 21, 22), where the images are correctly resized (to height: 100%;), but their container doesn't shrink. what could be causing the problem and how could i fix it? the website is at http://ww

Re: [css-d] Firefox & the new pixel density ??

Le 9 juil. 2013 à 10:20, Janet Lynn Ford a écrit : I'm not sure I understand what Firefox is doing. When I look at your screenshots, the font-size in the UI is identical between Chrome, IE and Firefox. But when I look at the text in the webpage, the text is visibly larger in Fx compared to th

Re: [css-d] Firefox & the new pixel density ??

Firefox V22 and Seamonkey 2.19 (which share much code) represent an enormous backwards step for those of us that choose to (or have to) work with text at larger than the default size for reasons of accessibility. Some mooted suggestions (not the one to which Jay refers : I refuse on principle to us