>
> If this layout were in a narrower viewport than shown, and keeping
> the grid as shown, in my mind the graphics in the middle row would begin to
> scale before the rest.
For clarification: are you saying that's how you think it should work *or*
that is the desired effect you're going for?
>
Thanks Karl
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> (Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but
> this is both combined. Sorry for the spam)
>
> Hi Tom,
> I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set
> to 100% width excep
(Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but this
is both combined. Sorry for the spam)
Hi Tom,
I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to
100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set.
The max-width size keeps them from
Hi Tom,
I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to
100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set.
The max-width size keeps them from becoming too large on a big screen and the
min-width keeps them from becoming too small.
Any width that is between th
List,
I have not run into this situation before and I am hoping I am just over
thinking it or it's a "can't see the forest for the trees" kind of thing.
Given this layout:
http://tomliv.com/css-d/grid-of-diff-sizes/grid-with-diff-sizes.jpg
The black boxes represent svg graphics. Text would be li
