On 14/05/2008, Bobby Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're right here. Although David raised the
> legality issue, a div within a list item is perfectly
> valid (floated or not), and this equivalent of your
> original does render as expected (as I understand it,
> i.e. the same as th
On 13/05/2008, Del Wegener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It never occurred to me that it might not be legal to have a float inside an
> ordered list. Why not?
does not allow any child other than , so the problem is not the float.
Hope this helps,
Manfred
Hi all,
I suppose my question was too general to get useful answers. This time
its more concrete, you can try it:
http://documenta.rudolphina.org/cond-css-demo.xml
Any questions?
Manfred
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
On 19/04/2008, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manfred Staudinger wrote:
>
> ***off-list***
>
> You got a uri? Or just a mouth?
>
David,
> You got a uri?
I have not yet decided to publish it. To clarify the pros and cons I started
this thread.
> Or ju
mply multiple steps, which
makes sense in CSS too. It has obviously become a buzz word and I
found it used even for XSLT!
Thanks (also to Philippe and Georg) for your response,
Manfred
On 18/04/2008, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manfred Staudinger wrote:
> > Hi l
Hi list,
Currently I'm thinking about a consistent and simple method for CSS to
target not only IE's but also Mozilla, Safari and Opera, each of them
separately and standards compliant.
Up to now the CSS language actually available for developing web sites
is limited by the weakest browser to be
On 16/04/2008, James Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
>
> More realistic example: assume you want to use css 2.1 selectors (those
> which are supported even by IE7). This makes it necessary to hide the
> rules from IE6 and as a consequence you will end up with 2 ver
On 16/04/2008, James Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone explain why you would want to target all non-IE browsers and
> then all IE browsers?
More realistic example: assume you want to use css 2.1 selectors
(those which are supported even by IE7). This makes it necessary to
hide the ru
On 16/04/2008, Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could not more *strongly* disagree with you, and I'm not sure why you are
> calling my syntax "incorrect" or "unnecessary" either. If they both do the
> same thing, mine not only appears (to me, at least) to be more elegant, but
> is shorter
On 15/04/2008, Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can use this syntax to target all NON-MSIE browsers:
>
> @import url("css/fix/non_msie.css");
>
Thats definitely an unnecessary hack. The correct (although
proprietary) syntax would be:
css here
Regards,
Manfred
___
On 15/04/2008, John Griessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manfred Staudinger wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > If you want to select IE6 and IE7, but not IE8 nor IE5.5 or IE5.01
> > then you might use
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Thanks,
>
does it look in Safari, Firefox 3 and IE 8 ?
Regards,
Manfred
On 06/04/2008, Manfred Staudinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assume we have a table with these basic properties:
> table {
>border-collapse: collapse;
>border: 1px solid #859EB5;
>border-spacing
On 09/04/2008, Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:28 AM, Manfred Staudinger wrote:
>
> > b) Firefox 2.0.0.13 ignores height completely.
>
>
> Gecko (Firefox) does honour the height. But it uses the 'border-box'
>
iner. :-)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Alan.
>
> www.theatreorgans.co.uk
> www.virtualtheatreorgans.com
> Admin: ConnArtistes, UKShopsmiths, 2nd Touch & A-P groups
> Shopsmith 520 + bits
> Flatulus Antiquitus
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: M
Reading through your responses I found it necessary to set up a small
test page to show the effect of specifying different properties for
color on the hr element.
http://test.rudolphina.org/hr.html
Because of the number of bugs, interpreting the results is a non-trivial task
certainly. Some examp
Hi List,
Assume we have a table with these basic properties:
table {
border-collapse: collapse;
border: 1px solid #859EB5;
border-spacing: 0;
font-family: tahoma;
}
td {
border: 1px solid #859EB5;
font-size: 11px; text-align: right;
padding-top: 1px; padding-bottom: 1px;
pa
Hi Alan,
> Without me looking up specifications, if color has no meaning, then how do
> you propose > to change the color of a horizontal rule? It is not a border,
> neither is it a background, so
> how else would you style its color property? To answer my own question,
> Mozilla
> obviously th
#x27;m sorry, yes the code you posted is very simple, but it does not
show any bug in Firefox 2.0.0.13. The only problem is, you forgot to
show us the rule from your stylesheet, which causes the padding ("is
over 20px") on the . As a guess, that rule might just look like
this:
> I just found another bug in Firefox 2.0.0.13 which I haven't seen listed
> anywhere else.
>
> If I style as follows: hr {color:red;} it does appear as red and
> displays correctly in most browsers.
> However, in Firefox it displays, but with an enormous amount of top and
> bottom padding.
On 02/03/06, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not a static page.
I've updated the page with a static initial content for the div in
question (also
changed the inline style="display: none" to style="display: block"). If you
click "Anton Kupfer" you get the dynamic content (and the prob
Ingo,
http://free.pages.at/staudinger/Regest/Regesten/A1608-10-14-02382.html
I've uploaded a sligthly different version of this page in html, where
you can see the very same problem.
Manfred
On 02/03/06, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manfred Staudinger wrote:
> >
Hi list,
If you click "Anton Kupfer" on this page
http://free.pages.at/staudinger/Regest/Regesten/A1608-10-14-02382.xml
then after "Quellen:" Fx 1.5 displays
1604-04-10 1605-09-03 1608-10-14 1612-10-18
as three links and one span, but ie6 only displays three links,
1604-04-10 1605-09-03 1612-
Can someone please check this page
http://free.pages.at/staudinger/Regest/Regesten/A1603-11-29-02004.xml
with Safari 1.3 and 2.0?
I've seen a Problem UTF-8 characters (ä ö ü) not displaying correctly,
but wanted to know if the problem is reproducible. Thanks in advance!
Manfred
I've submitted bug 321493 for this.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321493
Manfred
On 15/12/05, Manfred Staudinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This following can be demonstrated with (currently for _fx_only_) page
> http://free.pages.at/st
Hi list,
This following can be demonstrated with (currently for _fx_only_) page
http://free.pages.at/staudinger/Regest/Indices/Index.html
The anchor E on the left side
E
will receive focus in firefox 1.0.4+ when anchor E from the top line
E
is clicked - but not in firefox 1.5.
Is the change inte
25 matches
Mail list logo
