>I cannot believe how hard CSS is. I am ready to give up.
Don't give up Nancy. CSS isn't "easy" but it is worth the effort to learn.
And don't let the expertise on this list fool you. At some point, we were
all beginners. The more I learn about CSS the more I know I don't know.
> What am I doing
While not completely on-topic -- be careful of using red on green or vice
versa. The Red/Green color combination is the most standard one that fails
for color-blind users. For them it will closely resemble gray on gray. In
other words, unusable.
A neat little free tool called "Colour Contrast Anal
> ... The JavaScript I ended up using was one very short function.
> I could have sworn I pulled it from either Eric Meyer's "More ... "
> book or from The CSS Anthology along with research via Google.
I just found my SOURCE today and thought I would pass it along. The O'Reilly
"CSS Cookbook" b
> I sent him an example of what he wanted to do, which can be pretty
annoying:
> http://icant.co.uk/sandbox/sticky.html
I agree -- didn't like this behavior.
> Could it be you meant YADM?
http://www.onlinetools.org/tools/yadm/expanding.html
ARGH -- that JavaScript is huge!
It is
I have done an expanding submenu -- the CSS determines HOW it will look. The
JavaScript implements the action. I wish I could remember right now where I
found the solution -- but I believe it was on-line. Search for:
expanding menu CSS JavaScript
-Original Message-
From: dimpie [
The question posed in the subject comes with some constraints:
- I must provide a site style that will be used by various different page
maintainers -- where skills range from beginner to advanced.
- The site will have two different basic pages -- two-column and
three-column.
- There will be a s
I'm familiar with that JavaScript -- we stopped using it quite some time
ago. Check that the JS doesn't have something that is directed to specific
versions of IE. It could have something also setting the CSS that is causing
the problem.
If you find something in the JS dealing with CSS, I "think"
What is the recommended value for setting 0 in such CSS settings as padding
or margin?
Should it be margin: 0px; padding: 0px;
ormargin: 0; padding 0;
And does it matter if it is px or not when all four sides are set
individually as in padding: 3px 0 5px 0;
Or should it be
First, I don't use "ad impressions" either but this sounds very much like
the ole "counter page" issue.
If it turns out that CSS is reducing the clicks that is no reason to abandon
it. What they are looking for is how the "new" numbers measure up to the old
ones.
Let's assume your new page has
> My question is this, is there a way to accomplish the original goal of
maintaining the site with one header and footer file using CSS?
Debbie -- you asked this question earlier this week. The answer isn't going
to change. What you are wanting to do is CONTROL content not DISPLAY of
content. CSS
I'm not an expert but several things:
1) the CSS does not validate. Several "complaints" but the #rightcol li
a:link had "text-decoration is defined multiple times in the same rule"
2) I found the #rightcol li a:link CSS in the CSS 3 times -- the same code
#rightcol li a:link {
color:#
11 matches
Mail list logo
