RE: [css-d] Why doesn't this page work?

I cannot believe how hard CSS is. I am ready to give up. Don't give up Nancy. CSS isn't easy but it is worth the effort to learn. And don't let the expertise on this list fool you. At some point, we were all beginners. The more I learn about CSS the more I know I don't know. What am I doing

RE: [css-d] expanding submenu

... The JavaScript I ended up using was one very short function. I could have sworn I pulled it from either Eric Meyer's More ... book or from The CSS Anthology along with research via Google. I just found my SOURCE today and thought I would pass it along. The O'Reilly CSS Cookbook by

RE: [css-d] expanding submenu

I sent him an example of what he wanted to do, which can be pretty annoying: http://icant.co.uk/sandbox/sticky.html I agree -- didn't like this behavior. Could it be you meant YADM? http://www.onlinetools.org/tools/yadm/expanding.html ARGH -- that JavaScript is huge! It is

[css-d] Site style - which is better liquid? Fixed-width?

The question posed in the subject comes with some constraints: - I must provide a site style that will be used by various different page maintainers -- where skills range from beginner to advanced. - The site will have two different basic pages -- two-column and three-column. - There will be a

RE: [css-d] Q: Son of a Suckerfish

I'm familiar with that JavaScript -- we stopped using it quite some time ago. Check that the JS doesn't have something that is directed to specific versions of IE. It could have something also setting the CSS that is causing the problem. If you find something in the JS dealing with CSS, I think

[css-d] Question concerning use of 0px

What is the recommended value for setting 0 in such CSS settings as padding or margin? Should it be margin: 0px; padding: 0px; ormargin: 0; padding 0; And does it matter if it is px or not when all four sides are set individually as in padding: 3px 0 5px 0; Or should it be

RE: [css-d] CSS and Ad Impressions

First, I don't use ad impressions either but this sounds very much like the ole counter page issue. If it turns out that CSS is reducing the clicks that is no reason to abandon it. What they are looking for is how the new numbers measure up to the old ones. Let's assume your new page has the

RE: [css-d] One Header And Footer for Site Using CSS?

My question is this, is there a way to accomplish the original goal of maintaining the site with one header and footer file using CSS? Debbie -- you asked this question earlier this week. The answer isn't going to change. What you are wanting to do is CONTROL content not DISPLAY of content. CSS

RE: [css-d] link list problem in IE_ from yesterday

I'm not an expert but several things: 1) the CSS does not validate. Several complaints but the #rightcol li a:link had text-decoration is defined multiple times in the same rule 2) I found the #rightcol li a:link CSS in the CSS 3 times -- the same code #rightcol li a:link { color:#FF;