Re: [css-d] display: table-cell --- why?

fined: every element has display:inline. If your custom XML contains a table-like structure, you can use the table-* display values to instruct the UA to display that stuff as a table. Sebastian Redl __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [css-d] TEXTAREA wrap="off" - a CSS alternative?

is not deprecated - it never was standard, at least as far back as HTML 3.2. Soo ... the most interoperable solution while keeping valid static markup is probably to set white-space to nowrap/pre (should be identical, as spaces are never collapsed in text areas) and to use

Re: [css-d] maxlength attribute in css

): http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4 If it doesn't validate, that's a bug in the validator. Sebastian Redl __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css

Re: [css-d] Positioning generated content in Firefox

seems possible in FF, unless I'm doing somnething wrong. Nothing wrong. It's a known shortcoming of the Gecko engine. Sebastian Redl __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-

Re: [css-d] Specificity question

Reese wrote: > What can I do? > > Reese You can check your style sheet carefully for syntax errors that would make the UA ignore your styles, because as you have them now, they're correct and should override the earlier styles.

Re: [css-d] alt tag in CSS?

jack fredricks wrote: >in general, layout and decorative (by this i mean no real content) >images shouldnt have an alt tag (to be more precise, their alt tag >should be alt="" [no space]). Background images are pretty much always >decorative. > > Or rather, if they're not decorative, then they s