Re: [css-d] Site Check - Footer Problem

2007-10-30 Thread Tony Haddon
Hi, I've only looked at it in Firefox. I notice you've a *and* a maybe if you put your #footercontainer within the #containerwrapper it would simplify things for you? Just a thought. T. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:

[css-d] Firefox behaviour - Child element margins applied to parent elements instead

2007-07-25 Thread Tony Haddon
Hi All, I hope this isn't something that's come up before. Seeing as it's not in the lists of usual bugs in browsers, I'm guessing it might be my ignorance rather than a poorly implemented recommendation. I hope someone can enlighten me as it's something that's repeatedly come up and I've never fo

Re: [css-d] Columns with more than one element

2005-09-02 Thread Tony Haddon
Generally I'd wrap each row in a separate div with a clear:both style assigned to it. div.row { clear: both } a b c d Might not be ideal though and I'm sure more experienced CSSers would have a better suggestion. I'd be keen to a way to avoid the extra

[css-d] PNG Transparency in IE for background-image

2005-07-21 Thread Tony Haddon
the (not working) Any ideas, links to resources etc much appreciated. Regards, Tony -- Tony Haddon -- Tony Haddon +353 (0)86 831 7058 58 Blackberry Rise, Portmarnock, Co. Dublin. [EMAIL PROTECTED] VAT Reg: IE6837435H

Re: [css-d] Problem with links as block-level elements

2005-06-15 Thread Tony Haddon
Hi Eric, Thanks for the advice, although I'm not sure I completely understand. I want to get the links sitting side-by-side across the top as is, but the only way I know to do that is to nest divs and float:right hence: foo fooyootoo fooyoothree If there's a better

[css-d] Problem with links as block-level elements

2005-06-14 Thread Tony Haddon
Hi list, Love your work :) hope you can help me... I'm using links here as block-level elements containing "off-left" (http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ScreenreaderVisibility) spans and background images, so I'm probably looking for trouble to begin with! Please see: http://www.easycare.