Re: [css-d] button padding in FF

Hmm. the plot thickens. In mozilla's forms.css is where it all happens: button::-moz-focus-inner, input[type="reset"]::-moz-focus-inner, input[type="button"]::-moz-focus-inner, input[type="submit"]::-moz-focus-inner, input[type="file"] > input[type="button"]::-moz-focus-inner { padding: 0px 2px

[css-d] Fwd: button padding in FF

damn that Reply-To -- Forwarded message -- From: sam foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:49 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] button padding in FF To: Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The span is in the button to provide for flexibility in how the

Re: [css-d] button padding in FF

I have that exact browser, albeit on OS X 10.5.2 - as have many 1000s of dojo users, so thats a worrying report. Firebug or other addon instability? Thanks for going and taking a look though. I've put up a reduced test case at: http://sam-i-am.com/work/sandbox/css/buttonpadding.html On Mon, May 5

[css-d] button padding in FF

does anyone know a trick to get rid of the minimum padding that FF applies to button elements? I'm putting background image on a span inside a button and its applying 3px left/right padding around the contents, even if I set padding: 0. Also tried -moz-padding-start: 0; -moz-padding-end: 0; to no e

Re: [css-d] Safari Height Problem

As you say there's all kinds of nested table fun going on there. And AFAICT you've just got your div in the wrong td. Back out a level or two and look at the rows - there's 2 rows to the table, one for the top, one for the bottom. You need to inject your div into the bottom row, first td. There may

Re: [css-d] nesting / specificity problem

> No ambiguity at all, imho. Both selectors have the same specificity. > Both target the same element: a p that is a descendant of a div (this > can be div p or div div p or div div div p). Descendant is the > keyword here. > The second selector wins, because it comes last in the stylesheet. > CSS

Re: [css-d] minimum height on a box in IE?

explicit what was going on. This was for a optional footer on a portlet container where the footer div was used to complete the chrome around the portlet, but may not always have any content. thanks, Sam On 10/8/06, Holly Bergevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "sam foster"

Re: [css-d] nesting / specificity problem

My goal is to allow the container context to style my "P", but not inherit different styling when that container is nested in a different one > > ..panel2 .container-type2 .container-type1 p { > > background-color: pink; /* this isnt working. */ > > } > > ..panel2 .container-type1 .container-ty

Re: [css-d] converting a layout of buttons to tableless

I tend to treat button rows (I call them button trays) like any other list of links, and use floats, with markup something like this: Button Label the UL has margins, padding, list-style-type reset, .buttonTray li has float: left, .end has clear: both. between .buttonContainer and .som

[css-d] nesting / specificity problem

I've got a test page at: http://www.sam-i-am.com/work/sandbox/components/nested_containers.html It shows some tests I'm doing with nesting containers. I'm trying to define some container styles that will work nested one in the other (to a reasonable, arbitrary depth e.g. 4 or 5). I seeing some str

Re: [css-d] U.S.

? What about css-d isn't working for you? Its (almost?) all english-language. Occassionally people might spell colour as color (or vice-versa).. sorry if I'm missing the point. Sam On 10/2/06, Lori Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know a CSS discussion list that is U.S. based? Than

Re: [css-d] CSS Slideshow

Maybe s5 is better? it is exactly this hybrid. Very standards-based, and smart in its use of a semantic document structure, css, js.. and easily extensible. http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/s5/ > Yes, but the problem is once again that the stability and > accessibility of these solutions is just di

[css-d] minimum height on a box in IE?

This is so simple I must be missing something. But I have this div, that I want to give a minimum height of 1px. It may or may not get any content in it, and I want it to collapse up if its empty. IE 6 doesnt of course support min-height, so for now I'm using height: 1px. But even this simple case

Re: [css-d] URGENT... Client's requirement changed... Rip and tearat an entire CSS now??

> See, I do not do layout professionally, and do not have to work from > design comps. Now design comps certainly have their place, but > I think that the web is _essentially_ a flexible medium. Just for the record, you can do flexible width table layouts too. But I'm being cast as the table advoc

Re: [css-d] IE7 on Windows 2000... possible?

I believe the official word from the IE team is that ie7 will be released for server2003, XP, Vista and the win64 platforms. If you have a version of XP, you could install in virtual pc (which is free nowadays) Sam On 9/22/06, Ian Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Subject: [css-d] IE7 on Windo

Re: [css-d] URGENT... Client's requirement changed... Rip and tearat an entire CSS now??

Well, I for one have several more years experience making layouts that way than with CSS. They also tend to be more forgiving - of overwidth content for example. I also think table-ing up a (non-trivial) layout can be a more intiutive process than doing the same in CSS. Wrapping your head around fl

Re: [css-d] Smarty templates and CSS

I think the pros and cons of Smarty go beyond the scope of this list, no matter how you frame it. That said, from a CSS designer's experience / point of view I like the model. It makes logical sense. >From the PHP developers point of view, I find it ultimately redundant - php is already a hypertext