At 9/6/2006 03:13 AM, David Dorward wrote:
One of the major critisms of CSS Zen Garden is
that it is laden down with vast numbers of divs and spans which are
there solely to hook CSS onto.
I find it hard to take seriously criticism that the Zen Garden page
has too many tags! That would be like
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
...
Well, divs have no semantic meaning, so *any* div that you add to a page
is for the purpose of design, really. There's no such thing as a
semantic div, in the strict sense. But, I doubt you are looking for
examples of sites that use neither tables nor divs,
Audra Coldiron wrote:
http://designerkarma.com
[...] They are all totally necessary to have nearly complete design
flexibility while working with the same skeleton.
I'll say a 'conditional yes' to that - given the current standards, but
are those inline styles necessary too?
I've often
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 9/6/2006 03:13 AM, David Dorward wrote:
One of the major critisms of CSS Zen Garden is
that it is laden down with vast numbers of divs and spans which are
there solely to hook CSS onto.
I find it hard to take seriously criticism that the Zen Garden page
has too
http://designerkarma.com
Pity it doesn't survive when properly served, as 'application/xhtml+xml'...
( XML parsing failed: syntax error (Line: 114, Character: 44) )
Might have been more useful then, and in accordance with XHTML 1.0
standard. Shouldn't be too difficult to achieve.
If you
Audra Coldiron wrote:
http://designerkarma.com
If you tried to validate it failed due to my own poor mark-up in the
content, not the skeleton. That's what I get for trying to do too
many things at once. All's fixed now though, thanks for pointing it
out :-)
I usually don't bother to run
Hi
I do not know if this is a question for this forum, but I try.
(Correct me if the question is not suited for this forum)
I am interested in any examples of web sites (well-known, perhaps
public) that uses xhtml for structuring of the information and css for
design, BUT NO divs or other
On 06/09/06, Norgren Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, for some reason, it always ends up with adding some extra divs or
other elements into the code, just for the purpose of having it look
exactly like the designer wanted it to look like.
I want som examples of nice looking web sites, to
Norgren Mats wrote:
The web page validates at w3c, for sure, but it is annoying with
these extra lines of codes. I want the xhtml documents to be totally
free from design, all the way!
Well, it is a common problem in that if there isn't suitable elements
in the source-code to add styles to,
Norgren Mats wrote:
Hi
I do not know if this is a question for this forum, but I try.
(Correct me if the question is not suited for this forum)
If you're ever unsure whether your post is appropriate, please ask the
moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] first.
I am interested in any examples
...
Well, divs have no semantic meaning, so *any* div that you add to a page
is for the purpose of design, really. There's no such thing as a
semantic div, in the strict sense. But, I doubt you are looking for
examples of sites that use neither tables nor divs, as that would be a
pretty plain
11 matches
Mail list logo
