>Use "reply to list" it's much easier :-)
I don't have that option
Cheryl
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List p
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 11:07 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 7:41 PM -0700 8/21/10, Cheryl Smith wrote:
> >When I reply to an email, I get the individual's name instead of the
> >list. Do I need to select reply all in which case the individual and
> >the list will be sent a message?
> >
> >Cheryl
>
> Che
At 7:41 PM -0700 8/21/10, Cheryl Smith wrote:
>When I reply to an email, I get the individual's name instead of the
>list. Do I need to select reply all in which case the individual and
>the list will be sent a message?
>
>Cheryl
Cheryl:
I "reply to all" and then remove all email addresses exce
===
Yes that is exactly what I normally do. This means the OP gets two messages
but we can't help it unless you remove the individual's email from To: item.
This should be fixed but nobody seems to have complained about it up to now.
===
I wasn'
Do note that this is an often-debated philosophical point. I won't go
into the reasons, since I don't want to start an off-topic argument, but
perhaps the reason it hasn't been "fixed" is because the list admins
don't consider the current behavior to be broken.
(If you *really* care about the rea
> Do I need to select reply all in which case the individual and
> the list will be sent a message?
Yes (unless your reply is off-topic)
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz
__
css-discuss [c
Yes that is exactly what I normally do. This means the OP gets two messages
but we can't help it unless you remove the individual's email from To: item.
This should be fixed but nobody seems to have complained about it up to now.
--- On Sun, 22/8/10, Cheryl Smith wrote:
> When I reply to a
When I reply to an email, I get the individual's name instead of the list. Do I
need to select reply all in which case the individual and the list will be sent
a message?
Cheryl
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
iorhael wrote:
>> Please, Debby, not again tables vs CSS!
>>
>> http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=TablesVsDivs
>
>
> Uh-oh, it appears I may have opened up an old can of worms here...
The subject tends to come up from time to time :-)
May I also point out the existence of 'the CSS table mod
> Please, Debby, not again tables vs CSS!
>
> http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=TablesVsDivs
Uh-oh, it appears I may have opened up an old can of worms here...if so I
truly apologize...Thanks for the link and the info Christian, and for your
info as well Tom...I will just refer to that...
De
>Try resizing the font in most designs to see how they break.
Very true. However, most (if not all) table based sites will break
too. I was responding to the idea that table based allows more
creativity.
I do agree with your points, though.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Medi
> >This definitely allows for more creative web site design
> I beg to differ...
> http://www.csszengaarden.com
Must be the dutch/swedish version.
http://www.csszengarden.com is the correct one.
> Select any design on the right-hand sidebar. The vast majority are
> extremely creative.
> IMHO, thi
Please, Debby, not again tables vs CSS!
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=TablesVsDivs
As to your questions:
- You sell your knowledge to the client, if we always did the same
sites that the clients showed us, we'd be stuck in 1997 until now. The
client does not care what you use, as long as
>This definitely allows for more creative web site design
I beg to differ...
http://www.csszengaarden.com
Select any design on the right-hand sidebar. The vast majority are
extremely creative.
IMHO, this proves anything can be acheived with CSS.
That being said, I still use tables when there is
I have a general question on tables. I am noticing many, many web sites out
there are still using tables...particularly web sites, such as Monster.com that
have multiple blocks of content. I have eliminated tables from all my web sites
and use float for blocks of text, but my websites are fairly
Schalk wrote:
I have a question that is not particular to a site I am developing
but, I have experienced this. What makes text break outside the
border of a DIV? If there is something that will cause this, what can
be done to undo this and make the content fit into the given width of
the DIV?
Greetings All
I have a question that is not particular to a site I am developing but,
I have experienced this. What makes text break outside the border of a
DIV? If there is something that will cause this, what can be done to
undo this and make the content fit into the given width of the DIV?
> From: Colin DiBiase
>
> I always thought you were supposed to put position in your Div Ids
> and stuff? but on the pages no one seems to be putting them at all.
> if it not there is there a default the tags becomes?
>
> Also, I always thought there was a ie problems with positioning and
>
Hi this is just a general question i would like to be updated on.
I always thought you were supposed to put position in your Div Ids
and stuff? but on the pages no one seems to be putting them at all.
if it not there is there a default the tags becomes?
Also, I always thought there was a ie
Lee McIvor wrote:
I'm having various problems with floats, and wondered if anyone could
point me to some good resources to read up on them. Specifically, i've
tried a few times to float two elements to give me two "columns" but the
way Firefox and IE6 seem to judge widths, in percentage terms, a
Hi,
I'm having various problems with floats, and wondered if anyone could
point me to some good resources to read up on them. Specifically, i've
tried a few times to float two elements to give me two "columns" but
the way Firefox and IE6 seem to judge widths, in percentage terms,
always seems
Hi,
I'm having various problems with floats, and wondered if anyone could point
me to some good resources to read up on them. Specifically, i've tried a few
times to float two elements to give me two "columns" but the way Firefox and
IE6 seem to judge widths, in percentage terms, always seems co
22 matches
Mail list logo
