Sorry, my subject line should read:
Media query syntax when a separate *print* style sheet is included
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-disc
Le 15 mars 2013 à 06:18, Micky Hulse a écrit :
> Heck, do I even need the "all and" bit at that point?
>
> @media () { … }
I never use these 'screen', 'all', … media types ( OK, I'm lying… I only use
them when strictly necessary, e.g only when I want the MQ to be really limited
to a particul
Hi Philippe! Thank you so much for your CSS guru help, I greatly
appreciate it. :)
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> I never use these 'screen', 'all', … media types ( OK, I'm lying… I only use
> them when strictly necessary, e.g only when I want the MQ to be really
Le 15 mars 2013 à 11:19, Micky Hulse a écrit :
> 1. IIRC, I think I read somewhere that using a separate style sheet
> will allow support in older IEs (would the alternative be @media print
> { ... }? Is that the technique you use to keep your print/screen
> styles together?).
Someone else shou
Hi Philippe, many thanks again for the help!
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> Someone else should correct me, but IE 5.5+ supported the basic @media
> screen {} or @media print {} correctly. IE 5 for Mac OS X didn't
> though, but that browser is long since dead.
> (a
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> For a while now, I've been writing 90% of my media query syntax like so:
> @media screen and () { ... }
You know, it's strange ... It seems like everywhere I look people do:
@media only screen and (x) { ... }
But by default, when printin
Le 16 mars 2013 à 09:05, Micky Hulse a écrit :
> Is this intentional, or a case of one person doing it one way first,
> and everyone copying from that one source until it becomes the norm
> default/example syntax?
The copy/paste disease.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com
__
This may shed some light:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8549529/what-is-the-difference-between-screen-and-only-screen-in-media-queries
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh
wrote:
> Le 16 mars 2013 à 09:05, Micky Hulse a écrit :
>> Is this
Le 16 mars 2013 à 09:37, Tom Livingston a écrit :
> This may shed some light:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8549529/what-is-the-difference-between-screen-and-only-screen-in-media-queries
That stack overflow page refers to this passage in the MQ level 3 spec:
> The keyword ‘only’ can a
Hi Tom and Philippe, thanks for the replies!
Thanks for linkage Tom!
> The copy/paste disease.
Ha! That's the term I was looking for! :D
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> I’ve always found that statement about the ‘only’ keyword in the CSS
> MQ spec somewhat ambiva
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Micky Hulse
wrote:
> Oh, that's good to know. I did not realize that this was the case. I
> probably read some misinformation somewhere (or I did not fully
> understand one of the articles I read) saying that @media print {} was
> IE9+ thing.
Ah, I think this is
Le 16 mars 2013 à 14:08, Micky Hulse a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Micky Hulse
> wrote:
>> Oh, that's good to know. I did not realize that this was the case. I
>> probably read some misinformation somewhere (or I did not fully
>> understand one of the articles I read) saying tha
FWIW, I use MQs on link elements to load sheets. Then, for IE less than 9, I
repeat the link elements without MQs inside a conditional comment to serve the
desktop only layout to those browsers. This may be a little low-tech and it is
a few more http requests, but I am not a fan of poly-filling
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Tom Livingston
mailto:tom...@gmail.com";>> wrote:
FWIW, I use MQs on link elements to load sheets. Then, for IE less than 9, I
repeat the link elements without MQs inside a conditional comment to serve the
desktop only layout to t
Hi Tom! Thanks for the reply and help, I really appreciate it. :)
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> FWIW, I use MQs on link elements to load sheets. Then, for IE less than 9, I
> repeat the link elements without MQs inside a conditional comment to serve
> the desktop only l
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I'll add that I use a mobile-first approach and I don't repeat the base
> style sheet (which doesn't have an MQ) in the conditional comment and I have
> a separate link element for print styles, if I use one.
Just out of curiosity, do you h
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> Hindsight is 20/20, and a part of me is wondering if I should
> re-factor my CSS to take the approach you mention. Doing so would
> solve two problems that I'm having:
> 2. I'd like to feed IE < 8 a static "view". Because I'm using the
> "modul
17 matches
Mail list logo
