JR Heard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Dan Gayle
> wrote:
>> The full example can be found here: http://dangayle.com/test.html
>
> Firebug isn't picking up any of the div.extra-info styles you've
> defined in the head section. Solve that, and I'd bet you'll solve your
> problem.
> (I
On 24 Dec 2008, at 17:44, Dan Gayle wrote:
> I am having a specificity problem that I need help with. I am trying
> to create an info box that floats to the right within my main content
> div that uses the cascade to supply the styling. The content of that
> info box needs to be marked up using pl
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Dan Gayle wrote:
> The full example can be found here: http://dangayle.com/test.html
Firebug isn't picking up any of the div.extra-info styles you've
defined in the head section. Solve that, and I'd bet you'll solve your
problem.
(I'd start by validating the CSS.
I am having a specificity problem that I need help with. I am trying
to create an info box that floats to the right within my main content
div that uses the cascade to supply the styling. The content of that
info box needs to be marked up using plain html elements, because the
content write
Good afternoon Martin,
It was foretold that on 12/7/2007 @ 17:55:52 GMT+0200 (which was
12:55:52 where I live) Martin Heiden would write:
> If you want to style the links in the footer way different from the
> rest, use:
> #footer a:link { .. }
> #footer a:visted { ... }
> #footer a:hover
Olá Luc,
on Thursday, July 12, 2007 at 17:22 Luc wrote:
> Good afternoon list,
> In my footer i have links that in the hover state are underlined.
> Works in Opera, FF, Moz but not in IE7. For IE6 i had to add an
> aditional rule to make always show underlined (i can live with that),
> but
Good afternoon Alex,
It was foretold that on 12/7/2007 @ 16:32:51 GMT+0100 (which was
12:32:51 where I live) Alex Robinson would write:
> I can't see which links you mean. Could you be a bit more specific
> about ones you're on about?
The ones inside the footer: empresa, missão, clientes,
> In my footer i have links that in the hover state are underlined.
I can't see which links you mean. Could you be a bit more specific
about ones you're on about?
It's possible that you have been bitten by what I call fuzzy specificity
http://www.fu2k.org/alex/css/hacks/fuzzyspecificity
_
Good afternoon list,
In my footer i have links that in the hover state are underlined.
Works in Opera, FF, Moz but not in IE7. For IE6 i had to add an
aditional rule to make always show underlined (i can live with that),
but i was wondering if it's a specific IE7 problem?
http://www.dzinelab
Thanks very much!
I used your solution #1 (removing the "div" from "div.column-
content). (#2 wasn't general enough for all the contexts I want to
use it.) And that worked: it underlined what I needed to have
underlined.
Thanks, too, for the two additional resources. The "Calculating a
sel
Jim Ratliff wrote:
>By default, my links within a certain are not underlined.
>
> div.column-content a {color: #ff0080; text-decoration: none;}
>
>However, I want some of those links to be underlined. So for those, I
>defined a style:
>
> a.force-link-decoration {text-decoration: u
By default, my links within a certain are not underlined.
div.column-content a {color: #ff0080; text-decoration: none;}
However, I want some of those links to be underlined. So for those, I
defined a style:
a.force-link-decoration {text-decoration: underline; }
To apply this
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>On 10 Jan 2006, at 3:21 am, Adam Kuehn wrote:
>
> >>> [1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Home
> >>> >>> id="menu_about">About
> >>> [--more links--]
> >>>
>
>But in this case, the CMS (textpattern) and the plugin used for
>generating
On Monday 2006-01-09 15:07 -0500, Adam Kuehn wrote:
> Darn it. I hit "send" by mistake, before I verified this
> claim. That is, of course, not correct. Only one ID per element is
> allowed. I hate having to print retractions, but that's what I get
> for doing this stuff while I'm busy with
And now I see your retraction (sigh).
Ah well, maybe having the links in the archive will be of value if this
discussion ever comes up again :-)
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAI
> At 02:11 PM 1/9/2006, CJ Larson wrote:
>> > > > id="menu_about">About
>> >
>> > Note we have just changed the class="active" to id="active". Your
>> > global CSS file would then include something like this:
>> >
>> > ul li a#active {background-color: foo;}
>>
>>One note about this: now he has t
On 10 Jan 2006, at 3:21 am, Adam Kuehn wrote:
>>> [1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>>>
>>>
>>> Home
>>> >> id="menu_about">About
>>> [--more links--]
>>>
> id="menu_about">About
>
> The class="active" part is generated by your CMS, and you presumably
> had something in your g
At 02:56 PM 1/9/2006, Adam Kuehn wrote:
>At 02:11 PM 1/9/2006, CJ Larson wrote:
>> > > > id="menu_about">About
>> >
>> > Note we have just changed the class="active" to id="active". Your
>> > global CSS file would then include something like this:
>> >
>> > ul li a#active {background-color: foo;}
At 02:11 PM 1/9/2006, CJ Larson wrote:
> > > id="menu_about">About
> >
> > Note we have just changed the class="active" to id="active". Your
> > global CSS file would then include something like this:
> >
> > ul li a#active {background-color: foo;}
>
>One note about this: now he has two IDs inst
> Your original problem was that this selector was not sufficiently
> specific to override your other declarations for the anchor. I am
> suggesting that your content management system should generate
> something like this, instead:
>
> id="menu_about">About
>
> Note we have just changed the cl
At 01:11 AM 1/7/2006, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>>>[1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>>>
>>>
>>>Home
>id="menu_about">About
>>>[--more links--]
>>>
>>>
>>>Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>>>background. What should I do? This changes from page to page,
Hi Adam:
Adam Kuehn wrote:
> Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>
>> [1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>>
>>
>> Home
>> > id="menu_about">About
>> [--more links--]
>>
>>
>> Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>> background. What should I do? This changes from page
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>[1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>
>
>Home
>id="menu_about">About
>[--more links--]
>
>
>Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>background. What should I do? This changes from page to page,
>dynamically, so I can't use the ID property
Diego:
diego nunes wrote:
>On 06/01/06, Rahul Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>>background.
>>
>>
>Have you tried "!important"?
>.active { text-decoration: none !important;
>background-color: #
Rahul,
on Friday, January 6, 2006 at 16:03 Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>
> Home
> >About
> [--more links--]
>
.mainnav li a:link { text-decoration: none; color: #FFF; padding: 1em;
background-color: #000; line-height: 3em;}
.mainnav li a:hover { background-color: #FC0; color: #000; }
.mainnav li a
Dear All:
My first time using a CMS (TxtPattern), and I'm struggling a bit.
I'm trying to set the active link on this page [1], to a different color
from the rest.
Home
About
[--more links--]
Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
background. What should I do? This c
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:51:21 -0400, Linda Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html [xhtml]
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css [css]
I have a specificity problem.
[...]
So, why are the default a: styles overriding these?
ld
I have
Try background: transparent or background: none on the li link navs
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html [xhtml]
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css [css]
I have a specificity problem. The last thing I added were the
default link styles at the very botto
what was the original link (you removed it from the
thread).
I'll take a look.
--- Linda Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Anthony wrote:
> > try putting your global style at the top, instead
> of
> > the bottom. It's a top-down processing.
>
> I already tried that, it doesn't make a diff
Anthony wrote:
try putting your global style at the top, instead of
the bottom. It's a top-down processing.
I already tried that, it doesn't make a difference. This is my point,
specificity should not be contingent on order in this case. I'm not
selecting via the cascade.
ld
--
Linda Dunn
try putting your global style at the top, instead of
the bottom. It's a top-down processing.
--- Linda Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In my test site here:
>
> http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html
> [xhtml]
>
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css
Hi all,
In my test site here:
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html [xhtml]
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css [css]
I have a specificity problem. The last thing I added were the default
link styles at the very bottom of the page. However, adding this messes
32 matches
Mail list logo
