Chris Ovenden wrote:
> Isn't it time we let quirks mode go altogether? You're not making the
> most of IE6's already impaired render engine, and inviting a lot of
> box model hacks.
Quite the opposite, IMO.
IE6 just have /different/ impairments depending on mode. Once they're
sorted out it's jus
On 11/15/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd generally advice against "quirks mode" in any browser but IE6.
>
Isn't it time we let quirks mode go altogether? You're not making the
most of IE6's already impaired render engine, and inviting a lot of
box model hacks. Means abandoni
francky wrote:
> But in case of html4.01 Transitional without dtd-declaration:
> http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/img-and-text-hovering-b.htm
> I should go for my 2nd castle, which I like most of all. ;-)
Note that such a declaration is the same as "quirks mode" to browsers
Roger Roelofs wrote:
>Erik,
>
>On Nov 10, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Erik Harris wrote:
>
>
>>There are times when I'd like a link to contain both an image and
>>text. I
>>want the text to be underlined, as usual, but I don't want the
>>image to be
>>underlined. This works fine in most browsers, b
I agree with the img {display:block } tip. I always put that at the
beginning of my stylesheets, and only make them inline if I really
need it (which is almost never).
I may be wrong, but I believe it's bad practise to enclose the image
and text in the same tag. Inevitably you get a bit of unerli
Erik Harris wrote:
>[...]
>Here's a page with numerous examples of what I'm talking about:
>
>http://www.eharrishome.com/halloween/pumpkins.html
>
>I've tried various variations of
>a img {text-decoration: none; border: none !important}
>with no luck.
>Nothing seems to turn off the rather unsight
Erik,
On Nov 10, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Erik Harris wrote:
> There are times when I'd like a link to contain both an image and
> text. I
> want the text to be underlined, as usual, but I don't want the
> image to be
> underlined. This works fine in most browsers, but Firefox insists on
> underl
I know this has been asked before, but the thread I found about this
question didn't include a working answer.
There are times when I'd like a link to contain both an image and text. I
want the text to be underlined, as usual, but I don't want the image to be
underlined. This works fine in mo
