Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Would a poll be good for either one if/when they are available? -Original Message- From: Bob Meetin [mailto:b...@dottedi.biz] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:35 PM To: Andy B. Subject: Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout. Andy, To keep from getting utterly confuse

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > re: > > > > Either way, are the content blocks logically and practically grouped and > related? > > > Not for me. But then there are stranger folks than me that crawl the planet. Sometimes I even have to walk around them. In New York

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andy B. wrote: > re: > Either way, are the content blocks logically and practically grouped and > related? There is a logic and grouping. It is just not one I would have chosen. I would have suggested the main page content to

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

re: >Now it is no longer rail to rail. Min/max width are now being honored. Expected result. >My /off-the-wall guess/ is that the markup is not in the correct order. Probably not. I still have 2 boxes (user 3 and user 4 as the template defines them unused.

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > It is entirely different now than it was when I looked at it last night. > Last night the width of the outermost wrapper was honored. And, other > than that the type was teeny-tiny/itty-bitty, the positioning of the > various content blocks seemed to make sense. > > As of this wr

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > Take another look now. The only thing I havent changed at this point from > earlier was the site name written on top of the joomla logo. Hopefully this > one looks a little better. > > > >> re: >> >> >> > > > > It is entirely

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > Andy B. wrote: > >> I posted a while back and asked if you could verify that my page >> layout worked. The page in question is eternityrecords.org/private. >> > > re: > > Sighted, and somewhat sighted, people have rights, too :-) . Hon

Re: [css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Andy B. wrote: > I posted a while back and asked if you could verify that my page layout > worked. The page in question is > eternityrecords.org/private. re: Sighted, and somewhat sighted, people have rights, too :-) . Honor user default. Best, Helen

[css-d] Verifying positions of modules and page layout.

Hi. I posted a while back and asked if you could verify that my page layout worked. I am totally blind and need some sighted people to take a look at the page in question and let me know if the page layout turned out right. I am asking if you can do this for me again. The page in question is www.