MEM wrote:
> 2010/7/12 David Laakso
>
>> Keep it simple. Oh, easy for Leonardo. Far more difficult for the rest of
>> us...
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> ~d
>>
>
>
> :) I believe the graphic designer behind this as tried to make it very simple.
> Actually, the end users I've been able to talk, they say
MEM wrote:
> Well, here I would say, that I will be very angry as well, but on one
> condition, if, for some reason, it was important to have (for
> cross-data proposes or something else), access to both information at
> the same time.
> I cannot see a reason for doing so on this context. (that
MEM wrote:
> I would like to request your help, for two big issues that I'm unable to
> solve:
>
> The URI: www.nuvemk.com/nascer/
>
>
>
>
> Márcio
>
>
Keep it simple. Oh, easy for Leonardo. Far more difficult for the rest of us...
Best,
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.c
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) :
> OK, but will your visitors think it "cool" ? Or would they prefer
> to have control over what is concealed and what is revealed.
They sure prefer to have control and I sure prefer to give them that
control, to show or hide, and to do, only what is ex
MEM wrote:
> Yes. :) The reason why we cannot have all expanded it's because, if we
> have all expanded the "portfolio 100% height cool effect" is lost.
OK, but will your visitors think it "cool" ? Or would they prefer
to have control over what is concealed and what is revealed. As
one potent
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) :
>
>
> MEM wrote:
>
>> Thanks for point out some issues here and there, they are more then
>> welcome. :) I have a life to learn about this. :D
>
> OK, then another one :-)
>
> When I click on the first "+", it expands (reveals) that region;
> when I clic
2010/7/11 MEM :
> The Safari issue, stills there. :(
>
> Márcio
>
Well If I was Safari I would do the same. Strange however that others
don't follow.
My #wrapper-esquerda element was defined with a overflow:hidden;
property. (at the time I wanted to contain something perhaps), since
it was cont
MEM wrote:
> Thanks for point out some issues here and there, they are more then
> welcome. :) I have a life to learn about this. :D
OK, then another one :-)
When I click on the first "+", it expands (reveals) that region;
when I click on the second "+", it expands (reveals) that region;
but w
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) :
> OK, again not an answer to your real problem, Márcio,
> but as a visitor I would expect to be able to click
> on the "+" sign, not on the text, in order to expand
> the view.
>
> Philip Taylor
>
Yes. It was on my list before, I end up forgett
OK, again not an answer to your real problem, Márcio,
but as a visitor I would expect to be able to click
on the "+" sign, not on the text, in order to expand
the view.
Philip Taylor
MEM wrote:
> Yes. :( I'm thinking about ajax, and image size reduction.
> Maybe that will do it.
>
> But
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) :
> Oh, that is /desperately/ slow, Márcio : 23 seconds
> to complete loading. I am afraid I wouldn't be
> willing to wait that long in the real world. I really
> think you need to reduce the complexity and increase
> the efficiency.
>
> Philip Taylor
>
Oh, that is /desperately/ slow, Márcio : 23 seconds
to complete loading. I am afraid I wouldn't be
willing to wait that long in the real world. I really
think you need to reduce the complexity and increase
the efficiency.
Philip Taylor
MEM wrote:
> I would like to request your help, fo
Hello all,
I believe we can now see all the information regardless the viewport size.
I've added the position fixed property only for those that have a
width and height greater then a certain value.
I've used media queries and add a js to deal with IE versions.
Users that zoom in text, on the "f
13 matches
Mail list logo
