>
> The other thing to check is if MS makes the "Compatibility View" list
> public. If it does, that would give you a list of sites that look good in
> IE7 that don't look good in IE8. And generally, if it doesn't look good in
> IE8, it probably doesn't look good in anything else either.
>
>
Than
There's always the Acid 2 test. It looks the same in all the major browsers
now, but in IE6 and 7 it's a pretty stellar disaster.
The other thing to check is if MS makes the "Compatibility View" list public.
If it does, that would give you a list of sites that look good in IE7 that
don't look
Sander Sõnajalg wrote:
>>
>> but really, please, if anybody knows if there is some sort of a list of
>> faulty public real-world pages, i'd appreciate really if you let me know...
>> i've googled unsuccessfully for quite some time now. i just need something
>> to get me started with
Hi Sander,
I
2010/2/1 Sander Sõnajalg
> hmm.. browsers do quite much to compensate for the more simple/common
> mistakes in html like "" or "" or
> "babuhhh", interpreting it in the way that
> makes most sense, i guess..? but yes, eventually i plan to do the same sort
> of reseach also for XHTML, and build a
2010/2/1 Sander Sõnajalg :
> Hey,
> I'm currently doing some research on which are the most common sources of
> incompatibilities for CSS (different browsers understanding things
> differently). Does anyone know if there is some list of public pages with
> erroneous CSS somewhere? (I mean publicly
Hey,
I'm currently doing some research on which are the most common sources of
incompatibilities for CSS (different browsers understanding things
differently). Does anyone know if there is some list of public pages with
erroneous CSS somewhere? (I mean publicly available websites that look
signific
