Re: [css-d] validation error on closing tag

On May 31, 2011, at 7:01 AM, Janis Rough wrote: > 'm getting an error upon validating this page. It says end tag for > is not closed. Since I do have a tag it is something > else probably with the meta tag but I'm not clear on what it is. Not really a css issue, but since you asked… You

Re: [css-d] validation error on closing tag

On 05/30/2011 05:01 PM, Janis Rough wrote: I'm getting an error upon validating this page. It says end tag for is not closed. Since I do have a tag it is something else probably with the meta tag but I'm not clear on what it is. Thanks http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";

[css-d] validation error on closing tag

I'm getting an error upon validating this page. It says end tag for is not closed. Since I do have a tag it is something else probably with the meta tag but I'm not clear on what it is. Thanks http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>

Re: [css-d] validation with no warnings SOLVED

Hi, Thanks to everyone that replied. I have no figured out that HTML4/ Strict works for me and UTF8 is good too. I also learnt to change the preferences in my editor so that 'default file encodings' was 'Unicode UTF8' rather than automatic, which means that I do not need to use odd HTML ch

Re: [css-d] validation with no warnings

> >> http://wch.redrunner.co.uk/ >> >> The index page just has one warning, the others have 3. >> I'd love it if someone could tell me what >> doctype and UTF >> setting suits my style so that I can just strike that from >> my list. > > Hi Chris, > > Your home page only has a single warning, which

Re: [css-d] validation with no warnings

--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Chris Blake wrote: > http://wch.redrunner.co.uk/ > > The index page just has one warning, the others have 3. > I'd love it if someone could tell me what > doctype and UTF  > setting suits my style so that I can just strike that from > my list.  Hi Chris, Your home page o

[css-d] validation with no warnings

Hi, I am pleased that I managed to get this site done without asking the list for help! I did however post about doctype at the start and still didn't find the right answer. http://wch.redrunner.co.uk/ The index page just has one warning, the others have 3. I don't really get HTML and CSS

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

Elli Vizcaino wrote: > Hello, > > I think this might be a little off topic but it's related to validating CSS. > As of late, my documents have been validating but I get this warning: > "Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File" - I'm clueless as to what this really > means. Can someone please elabor

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

Rob Emenecker wrote: > With UTF-8 a byte-order mark is not necessary. However, Dreamweaver CS3 > allows you to include one in your files. Check your PREFERENCES -> NEW > DOCUMENT settings and DESELECT the "Include Unicode Signature (BOM)" option. > It is only required with UTF-16 and UTF-32. > >

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

Fri, 6/13/08, Elli Vizcaino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Elli Vizcaino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File? > To: "CSS Discuss" > Date: Friday, June 13, 2008, 11:38 AM > Hello, > > I thin

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

With UTF-8 a byte-order mark is not necessary. However, Dreamweaver CS3 allows you to include one in your files. Check your PREFERENCES -> NEW DOCUMENT settings and DESELECT the "Include Unicode Signature (BOM)" option. It is only required with UTF-16 and UTF-32. Now, as far as the files you have

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

Elli Vizcaino wrote: > I think this might be a little off topic but it's related to > validating CSS. It is off-topic, since it relates to validating markup (XHTML in your case), not CSS "validation". > As of late, my documents have been validating but I > get this warning: "Byte-Order Mark fou

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

On 13/06/2008, Melbeach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this might be a little off topic but it's related to validating CSS. > As of late, my documents have been validating but I get this warning: > "Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File" - I'm clueless as to what this really > means. Can s

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

Elli Vizcaino wrote: > Hello, > > I think this might be a little off topic but it's related to validating CSS. > As of late, my documents have been validating but I get this warning: > "Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File" - I'm clueless as to what this really > means. Can someone please elabora

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

> I think this might be a little off topic but it's related to validating CSS. As of late, my documents have been validating but I get this warning: "Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File" - I'm clueless as to what this really means. Can someone please elaborate? I had this problem when I started ou

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

* Elli Vizcaino wrote: >I think this might be a little off topic but it's related to validating >CSS. As of late, my documents have been validating but I get this >warning: "Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File" - I'm clueless as to what >this really means. Can someone please elaborate? See e.g.

Re: [css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

I don't know *exactly* what it means, but I know that you have to have a really good text editor to see it, because usually it won't show up. It appears *before* even the doctype in the head of your document. It'll be the very first thing you see. I can't tell you what kind of text editor

[css-d] Validation Warning: Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File?

Hello, I think this might be a little off topic but it's related to validating CSS. As of late, my documents have been validating but I get this warning: "Byte-Order Mark found in UTF-8 File" - I'm clueless as to what this really means. Can someone please elaborate? I think the default settings

Re: [css-d] validation question

tedd wrote: > I've learned something new every day of my life, and I'm getting > damned tried [ err ... tired ] of it. :-) Living, or learning..? ;-) CSS provides so much fun! I want more... regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no

Re: [css-d] validation question

tedd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I've learned something new every day of my life, and I'm getting damned tried > of it. :-) > > Cheers, > > tedd > -- You shouldn't be. When you stop learning, you're dead, whether you realize it or not! Bruce _

Re: [css-d] validation question

At 8:14 PM +0100 11/21/07, Jens Brueckmann wrote: > > "thin" is not an attribute for border > >Quite right, is is an allowed value for the border-width property, see: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#value-def-border-width > >Cheers, > >jens jens: I didn't realize that -- thanks. I've lear

Re: [css-d] validation question

> "thin" is not an attribute for border Quite right, is is an allowed value for the border-width property, see: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#value-def-border-width Cheers, jens -- Jens Brueckmann http://www.yalf.de __ cs

Re: [css-d] validation question

At 7:45 PM -0800 11/18/07, jaklitsch maya wrote: >What am I doing wrong? "thin" is not an attribute for border -- check this out: http://www.tizag.com/cssT/border.php Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com

Re: [css-d] validation question

jaklitsch maya wrote: > I just tried to validate a recent style sheet and was given 4 errors. > > > I thought the shorthand for border is > > border: size style color; Yes, in any order. However this... > border:1px thin #f7e0d5; ...contains two width-values - '1px' and 'thin', and a color-va

Re: [css-d] validation question

I just tried to validate a recent style sheet and was given 4 errors. I thought the shorthand for border is border: size style color; if you want to style all four sides. It did not like the border styling in these four entries: img a:link a:visited{ padding:.15em; border:1px thin

Re: [css-d] Validation confusion

On 31/10/07 (13:56) Jens said: >Exactly, the cached pages are submitted to the validator, resulting in >failed validation attempts when trying to import the local (cached) >Style sheets, which is the same case as Olivier Thereaux and Jens >Meiert discussed on www-validator-css. > >Why the WDT subm

Re: [css-d] Validation confusion

> It's definitely something with the way the FF Web Developer Toolbar > (hereafter WDT) works. If I select (from the WDT) Tools > Validate CSS, > it validates fine. > However, if I activate the WDT's 'Show page validation' (also under > 'Tools') then click on the green button with the checkmark tha

Re: [css-d] Validation confusion

On 31/10/07 (12:47) Jens said: >Rick, are you sure, you checked the page online, because the error >states it cannot retrieve a local file: >file://localhost/MeyerReset.css Hi Jens; It's definitely something with the way the FF Web Developer Toolbar (hereafter WDT) works. If I select (from the W

Re: [css-d] Validation confusion

> 1File not foundimport file://localhost/MeyerReset.css: > Operation > not permitted > > Is this a known issue with the WDT or am I doing something wrong? > (Apologies if this last bit has strayed OT slightly). Oh, the page being > checked is online, not local, if that helps. Rick

Re: [css-d] Validation confusion

On 31/10/07 (11:49) Jens said: >I believe the error is caused by your printing Style sheet - it >actually cannot be found, the referenced file returns a 404 error A-ha! Thanks Jens; in that case I won't worry about it (the print stylesheet is currently empty as I haven't done that bit yet) but it

Re: [css-d] Validation confusion

Hi Rick, > according to the FF web developer toolbar's 'Display page validation' > feature the CSS validates, but if I click to jump to the validator > itself it throws up the following error : > > Lexical error at line 488, column 2. Encountered: "h" (104), after : "<" > The error appear on both

[css-d] Validation confusion

Hi all; I have a site-in-progress that has just two working pages right now; according to the FF web developer toolbar's 'Display page validation' feature the CSS validates, but if I click to jump to the validator itself it throws up the following error : Lexical error at line 488, column 2. Enco

Re: [css-d] Validation problems

On 06/10/2007, Tim Offenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am reviewing a page for a client (www.physics.uiuc.edu) that uses a > hover class and some events. On lines 178, 194, and 202 in the HTML a > call for onmouseover, onfocus, onmouseout, and onblur events occurs. You're trying to apply onb

[css-d] Validation problems

I am reviewing a page for a client (www.physics.uiuc.edu) that uses a hover class and some events. On lines 178, 194, and 202 in the HTML a call for onmouseover, onfocus, onmouseout, and onblur events occurs. TIDY and W3C are both flagging this as use of proprietary code but I think that's beca

Re: [css-d] Validation Failure

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > George L Smyth Wrote: > > I have got the proper script tags surrounding the > JavaScript, > > Hello, > > Is this how your doing it? > > > // > > > If not change it and see what happens. > > Kind Regards > > GM) > ___

Re: [css-d] Validation Failure

George L Smyth Wrote: I have got the proper script tags surrounding the JavaScript, Hello, Is this how your doing it? // If not change it and see what happens. Kind Regards GM) __ css-discuss [EMAI

[css-d] Validation Failure

My apologies that this is not strictly a CSS question, but perhaps someone can either help or give me a link. I have got some JavaScript in the head of a page that is not validating. I do not see validating my page as the most important thing in the world, but if possible, I would like to fix it.

Re: [css-d] VALIDATION PROBLEMS

jane jordan wrote: > When I try and validate the page containing the CSS I receive the > following message :- > Lexical error at line 1, column 3. Encountered: "D" (68), after : > " > and > > "no style sheet found" You will get that message if you upload an HTML file to the CSS validator. The

Re: [css-d] VALIDATION PROBLEMS

Hi Jane, Could you post or paste the code somewhere for people to look at? I have found that those kind of errors have to do with either a doctype problem or some kind of JavaScript error. If you send the code, I am sure you will get more help. HTH, Riva jane jordan wrote: > Hello > > When va

[css-d] VALIDATION PROBLEMS

Hello When validating (by local file upload) just my CSS stylesheet I receive no errors. When I try and validate the page containing the CSS I receive the following message :- Lexical error at line 1, column 3. Encountered: "D" (68), after : "http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ ___

Re: [css-d] validation errors

Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Matthew Ohlman wrote: > > >> Brian Cummiskey wrote: >> >>> >>> USE css classes or IDs, or gloabl elements. >>> >>> ie, instead of body bgcolor, use >>> >>> body { background-color: #ff; } in your css sheet. >>> >>> instead of font, use >>>

Re: [css-d] validation errors

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Matthew Ohlman wrote: > Brian Cummiskey wrote: >> >> USE css classes or IDs, or gloabl elements. >> >> ie, instead of body bgcolor, use >> >> body { background-color: #ff; } in your css sheet. >> >> instead of font, use >> and >> .myclass { color: #ff; } >> for exampl

Re: [css-d] validation errors

Brian Cummiskey wrote: > > USE css classes or IDs, or gloabl elements. > > ie, instead of body bgcolor, use > > body { background-color: #ff; } in your css sheet. > > instead of font, use > and > .myclass { color: #ff; } > for example. > > Terri: A good reference/tutorial to see this

Re: [css-d] validation errors

Terri Chicko wrote: > Hi all > OK, I'm working at restructuring Terri, your doc type is XHTML strict. your page is riddled with code that is NOT XHTML strict valid (and some that are not even Transitional valid) bgcolor font etc USE css classes or IDs, or gloabl elements. ie, instead of body

[css-d] validation errors

Hi all OK, I'm working at restructuring my site. However I don't understand some of the validation errors The index page is the only one that is sort of fixed. www.hotniniz.com What does this mean? What do I need to change? Thanks Terri * Line 24, character 15:

Re: [css-d] Validation and I E 6 Help please

On Jul 12, 2007, at 5:56 AM, Phil Turner wrote: > now I have some IE 6 spacing issues I cant check it on my mac but > have been told > the portfolio thumbnails aren't spaced as they should be as well as > other spacing that is out of wack! > > http://www.philturner-uk.com/index.html > http://www.

Re: [css-d] Validation and I E 6 Help please

Hi Everyone my side validates, thanks for pointing me in the right direction Martin now I have some IE 6 spacing issues I cant check it on my mac but have been told the portfolio thumbnails aren't spaced as they should be as well as other spacing that is out of wack! The two pages are here ht

Re: [css-d] Validation and I E 6 Help please

Martin, I've run this site through the validator and it says it validates ok I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.4 can someone else check please, Thanks > On 7/11/07, Phil Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Help please my sites not working in IE 6 in various places its >> throwing some spacing out of wac

Re: [css-d] Validation error

Thanks for the help guys - my first site validated :-) now I've got to finish it :-0today! Kind Regards Phil Turner FREELANCE CREATIVE TEL: 0161 439 1669 Chartered Graphic Designer MCSD BA Hons [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.philturner-uk.com HELP SAVE THE PLANET - SEE MY NEW BOOK http://www.

Re: [css-d] Validation error

Phil Turner wrote: > I'm trying to validate the css, its passed the XHTML validation > but I'm getting this error on the css and not sure what to do as its > part of the links in the footer > > http://www.philturner-uk.com/kruger/ > > > Phil Turner > > Back-up the html file. Run it through Ti

Re: [css-d] Validation error

* Phil Turner wrote: >I'm trying to validate the css, its passed the XHTML validation >but I'm getting this error on the css and not sure what to do as its >part of the links in the footer > >http://www.philturner-uk.com/kruger/ > >Please, validate your XML document first! >Line 78 >Column 90 >El

[css-d] Validation error

Hi everyone I'm trying to validate the css, its passed the XHTML validation but I'm getting this error on the css and not sure what to do as its part of the links in the footer http://www.philturner-uk.com/kruger/ Please, validate your XML document first! Line 78 Column 90 Element type "a" must

Re: [css-d] Validation error + border glitch

* Kim Brooks Wei wrote: >I'm getting an error message which doesn't match with my code. Please >take a look and see if you can find what the validator is choking on > Y

[css-d] Validation error + border glitch

Page is http://www.njlada.com/plus/events/ I'm getting an error message which doesn't match with my code. Please take a look and see if you can find what the validator is choking on

Re: [css-d] validation

> > However, some of the responses have lead to something I've wondered > about which *is* CSS-related. Does setting image dimensions in a style > sheet and leaving them out of the HTML cause problems in any browsers? > > Funny you should ask. I have just done a test on this. So far haven't found

Re: [css-d] validation

Thanks so much for all the responses to my TIDY validation question (and to those who politely reminded me that my question was HTML- rather than CSS-related). However, some of the responses have lead to something I've wondered about which *is* CSS-related. Does setting image dimensions in a st

Re: [css-d] validation

Thanks Lea. I'll remove the px from the HTML and no longer go crazy! Lea de Groot wrote: > Patti Evans wrote: > >> Can someone explain to me why Tidy gives the following warning: >> >> - Warning: attribute "width" has invalid value "74px" - >> >> Aren't width and height supposed to be giv

Re: [css-d] validation

Patti Evans wrote: > Aren't width and height supposed to be given in px? Could it be > because the image is wrapped in tags? The other images on my > page don't get the warning. The (X)HTML width-attribute for the img-element is 'px' by default, so we don't write 'width="74px"', just 'width="7

Re: [css-d] validation

> Subject: [css-d] validation > > > Can someone explain to me why Tidy gives the following warning: > > - Warning: attribute "width" has invalid value "74px" - > > Aren't width and height supposed to be given in px? Could it be > bec

Re: [css-d] validation

HTML sizing attributes tag have to be plain numbers, with no units; in the case of width and height for images, it is assumed that the value is in pixels. That is, this HTML:: is equivalent to this CSS version: Of course, it would be better still to use some other means of associating that C

Re: [css-d] validation

Height and width for image should be simply numbers as far as I can remember. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wik

Re: [css-d] validation

Patti Evans wrote: > Can someone explain to me why Tidy gives the following warning: > > - Warning: attribute "width" has invalid value "74px" - > > Aren't width and height supposed to be given in px? Could it be > because the image is wrapped in tags? The other images on my page > don't

Re: [css-d] validation

On 16/10/2006 09:50, Patti Evans wrote: > Aren't width and height supposed to be given in px? Could it be > because the image is wrapped in tags? The other images on my page > don't get the warning. > It's because you're using "74_px_". The correct value for the attribute is "74". If you wan

[css-d] validation

Can someone explain to me why Tidy gives the following warning: - Warning: attribute "width" has invalid value "74px" - Aren't width and height supposed to be given in px? Could it be because the image is wrapped in tags? The other images on my page don't get the warning. Thanks, Patti

Re: [css-d] Validation assistance

Hi David. I get it, I think. In standard HTML, you don't need an end / in single tags (like br or img) and since the head section. So it isn't required in the head area. That makes sense. But I'm rambling outside of the css relevance. I appreciate the link and explanation. Delos On Oct 4, 2

Re: [css-d] Validation assistance

Thank you, Bjeorn. It seemed strange not to use the final >. The page this is taken from in written in HTML, so I can lose the /. I'm much more comfortable with that option. What a great list, huh? Thanks again. Delos On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > If you use HTML

Re: [css-d] Validation assistance

On 10/4/06, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/empty.html explains Wow, informative doc. Thanks for the link. > The /, in HTML terms is part of a NET tag Note that "NET" here is short for "Null Ending Tag", and has nothing to do with .NET, "the Net"

Re: [css-d] Validation assistance

On 04/10/06, Delos Woodruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to validate a page and got a particular error. Specifically, > because I'm using a strict html doctype, it didn't like the final > in > the css link. > > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/empty.html explains but the short version

Re: [css-d] Validation assistance

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Delos Woodruff wrote: >> I tried to validate a page and got a particular error. Specifically, >> because I'm using a strict html doctype, it didn't like the final > in >> the css link. >> >> ^^^

Re: [css-d] Validation assistance

* Delos Woodruff wrote: >I tried to validate a page and got a particular error. Specifically, >because I'm using a strict html doctype, it didn't like the final > in >the css link. > > If you use HTML, use If you use XHTML, use -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjo

[css-d] Validation assistance

Hello folks! I tried to validate a page and got a particular error. Specifically, because I'm using a strict html doctype, it didn't like the final > in the css link. I followed the help info on this and it says that the final > is not necessary, but that seems highly irregular to me. It als

Re: [css-d] Validation differences for incomplete tag ?!

francky wrote: > My conclusions and lessons: Apparently different browsers have > different "auto correcting machines" (or not) to handle incorrect > html. Extra reason to write good html... Indeed :-) As I have mentioned a few times on css-d lately: browsers 'error recovery' is not reliable. Co

[css-d] Validation differences for incomplete tag ?!

Hi all, In an other topic there was found that an incomplete end tag http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/74402 Very, very strange is, that the html-validator did not remark this error. The w3c-recommendations for html 4.01 say about the : "Start tag: required, End tag: optional" [1]

Re: [css-d] validation trouble

David Dorward wrote: > (and see the usual rants about why XHTML isn't a good choice for the > WWW in the first place) You could at least point(link) to one of those rants - if there are any with some substantial information around. Might be useful. XHTML is the *perfect choice* for the WWW. It

Re: [css-d] validation trouble

r.com%2Fshot1.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inli > neAny ideas, Is there a typo in the book?Hugh > __ > Seems to me that if you change doctype to : xhtml1-transitional.dtd, that would sort as rest is fine. Ch

Re: [css-d] validation trouble

On 21/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've built a new site for the firm I work for using 'stylin with css' as my > guide...It's not validating properly > though:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cmaxsonar.com%2Fshot1.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&

[css-d] validation trouble

I've built a new site for the firm I work for using 'stylin with css' as my guide...It's not validating properly though:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cmaxsonar.com%2Fshot1.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=InlineAny ideas, Is there a typo in the book?Hugh _

Re: [css-d] validation question

Patrick Roane wrote: >Hey folks, > >I ran my site through the validator: >http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//www.cpcconstruction.net/1/homes.html%23nogo > >I don't understand why it says that the >does not belong in the context ... > >I thought it was fine to include unordered l

[css-d] validation question

Hey folks, I ran my site through the validator: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//www.cpcconstruction.net/1/homes.html%23nogo I don't understand why it says that the does not belong in the context ... I thought it was fine to include unordered list Ids' w/in a span element. B

Re: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

Tracy Shorrock wrote: I'm getting rid of the ugly outline that appears on an image when it's used as a link. It doesn't seem to be set to default, as when I don't set -moz-outline I get the ugly borders when I click the links. That ugly outline is actually a border, not an outline. Try this:

Re: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

Hi Philippe, Will do, thanks. As Zoe pointed out, it isn't causing a problem in browsers so I'm not going to worry about it too much... Cheers, and thanks to all who responded. Tracy On Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 05:55 am, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: BTW, you're better off by first sp

Re: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

Hi, I'm getting rid of the ugly outline that appears on an image when it's used as a link. It doesn't seem to be set to default, as when I don't set -moz-outline I get the ugly borders when I click the links. Cheers, Tracy On Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 03:40 am, Peter Williams wrote:

Re: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

Roger Roelofs wrote: Validation is a guide, not a law. :-) Exactly. :-) Validation is a means to an end (a well functioning page) not an end in itself. If you know why your page won't validate, and you know that this isn't causing a problem in any browsers (it isn't, in this case), you h

Re: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

On 24 Aug 2005, at 11:40 am, Peter Williams wrote: I keep getting a parse error on -moz-outline: none; when validating #footer img { vertical-align: middle; outline: none; -moz-outline: none;} Tracy, moz-outline would seem to be a proprietory css extension, the w3c css validator is going to

RE: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

> From: Tracy Shorrock > > I keep getting a parse error on -moz-outline: none; when > validating > #footer img { vertical-align: middle; outline: none; -moz-outline: > none;} Tracy, moz-outline would seem to be a proprietory css extension, the w3c css validator is going to flag anything that i

Re: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

Tracy, On Aug 23, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Tracy Shorrock wrote: Hi, I keep getting a parse error on -moz-outline: none; when validating the following css: #footer img { vertical-align: middle; outline: none; -moz-outline: none;} Is there anyway to get around this? (apart from taking it out!)

Re: [css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

I don't think so :-( It's weird though, because I think the specifications says that vendors can add their own property's in the -vendorname-property format. Evert Tracy Shorrock wrote: Hi, I keep getting a parse error on -moz-outline: none; when validating the following css: #footer im

[css-d] Validation Error -moz-outline

Hi, I keep getting a parse error on -moz-outline: none; when validating the following css: #footer img { vertical-align: middle; outline: none; -moz-outline: none;} Is there anyway to get around this? (apart from taking it out!) Cheers, Tracy __

Re: [css-d] validation problem follow-up

* Jeanne Prine wrote: >Thanks to everyone who replied to my validation >problem post. I knew about converting & to & >in text but didn't think about doing it in the URLs >as well. After I fired off my question, I dug >around some more on http://validator.w3.org and >found a reference to using & i

[css-d] validation problem follow-up

Hello, Thanks to everyone who replied to my validation problem post. I knew about converting & to & in text but didn't think about doing it in the URLs as well. After I fired off my question, I dug around some more on http://validator.w3.org and found a reference to using & in URLs. That's what

Re: [css-d] validation problem

The ampersands in the urls need to be escaped properly (&). Regards, Jachin Senior Web Developer InternetFiji.com On 6/9/05, Jeanne Prine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Hope this isn't off-topic. I just finished a > subsite as part of a larger redesign. The CSS > validates bu

[css-d] validation problem

Hello everyone, Hope this isn't off-topic. I just finished a subsite as part of a larger redesign. The CSS validates but some pages won't validate as DOCTYPE XHTML 1.0 Transitional because of long URLs in navigation links. Is there anything I can do about this? I don't have any control over t