Re: [css-d] Would this be considered bad css form?

2006-01-11 Thread Mike Soultanian
Yeah.. we actually do something similar to what you were saying (we have globalstyles.css). It's good to hear that people don't have problems with my method 2 because I am really liking it. It seems like it has a bunch of benefits in the long-run. I just wanted to make sure ahead of time tha

Re: [css-d] Would this be considered bad css form?

2006-01-11 Thread Peach Lynda L CTR USAF 96 CG/SCTA
Re: > 2. Instead of doing stylesheet switching, the other thing I was thinking of was putting all my styles in one stylesheet and just change the class of an outer (i.e. body) to something like the following depending on what page you're on: or or and then I would write styles accordin

Re: [css-d] Would this be considered bad css form?

2006-01-11 Thread Mike Soultanian
Roger Roelofs wrote: >> 2. Instead of doing stylesheet switching, the other thing >> I was thinking of was putting all my styles in one >> stylesheet and just change the class of an outer tag (i.e. > > It is a personal preference thing. I prefer option 2 with an ID on the > body element. I've

Re: [css-d] Would this be considered bad css form?

2006-01-11 Thread Roger Roelofs
Michael, On Jan 11, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Michael Soultanian wrote: > 2. Instead of doing stylesheet switching, the other thing > I was thinking of was putting all my styles in one > stylesheet and just change the class of an outer tag (i.e. > body) to something like the following depending on what