-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: Nessie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Breast Cancer
-Caveat Lector-
I know as fact that MANY things that have been posted to these sites
ARE IN FACT NOT
HOAXES, e.g
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: MIKE SPITZER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Breast Cancer
Seriously though, my wife's oldest friend (from grade school) married an
ER
surgeon, and he
has personally
-Caveat Lector-
Seriously though, my wife's oldest friend (from grade school) married
an ER surgeon, and he has personally surgically removed several Gerbils
from the rectums of men in Houston in the 80's. He also told us that
there had been deaths due to this act.
This is third hand hearsay.
-Caveat Lector-
Seriously though, my wife's oldest friend (from grade school) married
an ER surgeon, and he has personally surgically removed several Gerbils
from the rectums of men in Houston in the 80's. He also told us that
there had been deaths due to this act.
This is third hand
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Steve wrote:
There's no doubt that a lot of nasty stuff is secreted in ALL fluids
leaving the body, e.g., sweat, lachrymal, urine, saliva, blood,
semen/vaginal, feces, open lesions, etc., etc.
Most waste is excreted in the kidneys, not the skin. If skin
-Caveat Lector-
I know as fact that MANY things that have been posted to these sites
ARE IN FACT NOT HOAXES, e.g., gerbiling,
You know as a fact that gerbiling is not a hoax? How do you know this,
personal experience or direct observation?
A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
-Caveat Lector-
June, the first part of this quote was from Michael Spitzer, not me. I am quite aware
that
the skin is NOT a major organ of elimination. That is what I was trying to point out.
Steve
On 1 Jul 01, at 10:27, YnrChyldzWyld wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Steve
-Caveat Lector-
On 1 Jul 01, at 10:27, YnrChyldzWyld wrote:
No, it's not the only one and no, it doesn't supercede the kidneys. But
try compromising the skin's ability to expel toxins, and see what
happens...
It is strange, just last week you were saying the Breast Cancer post was a hoax.
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Steve wrote:
No, it's not the only one and no, it doesn't supercede the kidneys. But
try compromising the skin's ability to expel toxins, and see what
happens...
It is strange, just last week you were saying the Breast Cancer post was a hoax.
It is.
-Caveat Lector-
This is a stupid hoax, an urban legand. It is surprising that anyone falls for
this.
Steve
On 29 Jun 01, at 23:14, Bill Richer wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
I thought this was interesting and wanted to share
--
Original Message
-Caveat Lector-
Oh, you're just SO incredibly clever, you little Dickens, you!!
You just KNOW SOOO MUCH - it's so NOBLE of you to point
out the foibles of your fellow, if lower, human beings.
Damn, I thought we got rid of you. No such luck.
Steve wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
This is a
-Caveat Lector-
Yes, I should have not said that since it was posted by someone on this list.
But that is no excuse for you to make your own imperious comment, Billy
Boy.
Your 'attitude' is the reason SNETNEWS is now free from you. ;-)
Steve
On 30 Jun 01, at 1:08, BB wrote:
Oh, you're just
-Caveat Lector-
Stupid hoax Steve - really. Bill Richer was nice enough to send this
out with good intentions?
You are a nasty little bastard.
Further for your informtion poisons often re absorbed through the
skin.years ago men did ot wear deodorants and then suddenly there
was a report
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Aleisha Saba wrote:
Stupid hoax Steve - really. Bill Richer was nice enough to send this
out with good intentions?
Yes, and the exact same hoax was spammed to this list weeks ago, and it
was pointed out at that time not only that it is a hoax, but it was
-Caveat Lector-
There's no doubt that a lot of nasty stuff is secreted in ALL fluids
leaving the body, e.g., sweat, lachrymal, urine, saliva, blood,
semen/vaginal, feces, open lesions, etc., etc.
What's more, aluminum chlorhydrate has always been a suspected carcinogen.
Models use the PURE
-Caveat Lector-
--- MIKE SPITZER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*MOST* of these most
beautiful of woman DO NOT LIVE TO THE EXPECTED DEMOGRAPHIC MEDIAN AGE
FOR
THEIR RESPECTIVE CULTURES?? It could be HEAVY coincidence, or maybe
the
Preparation H they use on the bags under their eyes.
-Caveat Lector-
Thanks Mike Spitzer - this was interesting information.
Saba
A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!
-Caveat Lector-
On 30 Jun 01, at 19:18, MIKE SPITZER wrote:
There's no doubt that a lot of nasty stuff is secreted in ALL fluids
leaving the body, e.g., sweat, lachrymal, urine, saliva, blood,
semen/vaginal, feces, open lesions, etc., etc.
Most waste is excreted in the kidneys, not the
-Caveat Lector-
I thought this was interesting and wanted to share
--
Original Message
From: kris[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FWD:Fw: Fw: FW: FW: Fw: Information -- Breast Cancer
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:16:40 -0500
Some information for us
-Caveat Lector-
It's a hoax.
http://urbanlegends.about.com/science/urbanlegends/library/blnotes8.htm
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
-Caveat Lector-
Breast Cancer
We need those of you who are great at forwarding
on info with your e-mail network. Please read and pass on.
Peace and good health.
It would be wonderful if 2001 were the year a cure
for breast cancer was
found
This is one note I'll gladly pass on. The
-Caveat Lector-
This has circulated the net a couple of times, and is a hoax...
The human body has a few areas that it uses to purge toxins; behind the
knees, behind the ears, groin area, and armpits. The toxins are purged in
the form of perspiration.
This is beyond poor science, it's
-Caveat Lector-
It's a hoax:
http://urbanlegends.about.com/science/urbanlegends/library/blnotes8.htm?terms=antiperspirants+breast+cancer
and
http://urbanlegends.about.com/science/urbanlegends/library/blbrcanc.htm?terms=antiperspirants+breast+cancer
--- tnohava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
I suspect the application of antiperspirants
under the testicles is the reason for the alarming
rise in prostrate cancer.
flw
A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, flw wrote:
I suspect the application of antiperspirants
under the testicles is the reason for the alarming
rise in prostrate cancer.
Can we then extrapolate the reason for the equally alarming rise in colon
cancer?
;-)
June
Check out Alternative Kite
-Caveat Lector-
YnrChyldzWyld wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, flw wrote:
I suspect the application of antiperspirants
under the testicles is the reason for the alarming
rise in prostrate cancer.
Can we then extrapolate the reason for the equally alarming rise in colon
http://www.sightings.com/general10/pits.htm
Breast Cancer Said Caused
By Antiperspirants
Elizabeth Morin
Dept. of Medicinal Chemistry
Merck Frosst Canada Co.
514 428-3222
6-1-01
I'm forwarding this to everyone I know because it makes so much sense.
Please forward it to everyone you care
-Caveat Lector-
-Original Message-
From: Zorka Papadopolos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 8:12 PM
Subject: SB698:Lekarski savet
-- Forwarded message --
***
From Katrina Scott
More info on cancer!
Frans
-Original Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[CTRL] Breast Cancer Awareness
29 matches
Mail list logo
