[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-25 Thread Amelia K Edgeman
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- > I saw that series on Human Sexuality on the Learning Channel, too. I do not think this 10% rate is from that at all. I do believe you are combining more than one source. And again, these are only theories, not established scientific facts

[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-25 Thread Amelia K Edgeman
: Monday, January 24, 2000 7:56 AM Subject: Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent' > -Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> > -Cui Bono?- > > From: "name AOL USER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Human sexuality and its place in

Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-24 Thread Tenorlove
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- --- Ynr Chyldz Wyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: << I consider this 'need to spread DNA' bullsh>> I really, REALLY don't think it's DNA they're trying to spread. __ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your f

Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-24 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- From: "name AOL USER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Human sexuality and its place in modern society is a fascinating field. I > suggest you read up on it more, to understand the bigger picture. I have. Which is why I consider this 'need to spread DN

Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-24 Thread name AOL USER
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- In a message dated 00-01-23 18:33:14 EST, you write: << But just WHO is getting these blood tests? Not regular Jane and John Schmoes... not happily married couples. These are blood tests being conducted when there is already a problem,

Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-23 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- From: "name AOL USER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Perhap the interpretations are not PC (sexist bullshit), but the facts can't > be wrong can they? I think it was Mark Twain who opined: "There are lies. There are damned lies. And then there are s

Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-23 Thread name AOL USER
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- In a message dated 01/23/2000 9:09:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Oliver Curry, the principal researcher, said long working > > hours and commuting by fathers could contribute to > > uncertainty about whether

Re: [CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-23 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- > Oliver Curry, the principal researcher, said long working > hours and commuting by fathers could contribute to > uncertainty about whether children have been fathered > by the man who is bringing them up. Pretty sexist. Men aren't the

[CTRL] TIMES: One in seven fathers 'not the real parent'

2000-01-22 Thread DIG alfred webre
-Caveat Lector- http://www.ctrl.org/"> -Cui Bono?- London Times January 23 2000 One in seven fathers 'not the real parent' Lois Rogers, Medical Correspondent AT LEAST one in 10 children was not sired by the man who believes he is their father, according to scientists