Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-21 Thread JYester
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/21/98 6:56:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I do believe that Bush needed to get out of the spotlight. Also the > Democractic majority of the populace demands that the Republicans allows > some > Demos in office, hopefully contr

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-21 Thread JYester
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/21/98 7:28:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Bush knew his time was up when David Rockefeller gave his full endorsement > of > Bill Clinton in an interview with The New York Times on October 16, 1992. Well, I would guess so! But

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-21 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector- I do believe that Bush needed to get out of the spotlight. Also the Democractic majority of the populace demands that the Republicans allows some Demos in office, hopefully controlled, at least a controlled besmirching. It allows the Hegellian process its latitudes. Bush was the

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-21 Thread JYester
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/20/98 12:20:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << Assuming that China is > making a profit on all the goods they are selling to US, where is all this > money going to? Well, one is to the continued erosion of any US national >

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-20 Thread E Mael
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes: >Why expect more from me? I agree with you wholeheartedly. But it is >unlikely >that we will get him for the big stuff so I say get him for what we can. >As >for there being plenty more of the republicans who are assholes and rich, >absolutely

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-20 Thread Teo1000
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/19/98 11:42:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Assuming that China is making a profit on all the goods they are selling to US, where is all this money going to? Well, one is to the continued erosion of any US national manufacturing

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-19 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/19/98 7:51:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Now as to Bush still being ringleader, I find that completely possible >in an overarching non-direct way, but he must be out of the loop in some of >what Clinton does in order for my theories about Clinton and Chi

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-19 Thread Teo1000
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/19/98 1:10:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << the only difference between the republicrats and the democans is that the republicrats can afford to make sure that those whose silence have been bought, stay bought. they keep that powe

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-19 Thread Teo1000
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/19/98 1:05:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, Roads End writes: << I say Mr. Bush is farther-up the puppet-master line. Clinton is more patsy than president, MHO. The impeachment proceedings are very destructive to our body politic/republic, that is why it is be

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-19 Thread E Mael
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes: >PS I know that Prudy will respond with "well why didn't we get Bush?" >because >that's the only mantra she knows to ward off the evil that surrounds >Clinton. >The answer is that he was TOO powerful and had TOO MUCH money. I don't >like >it an

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-19 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/19/98 9:31:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >CLINTON >is president NOW not BUSH. I say Mr. Bush is farther-up the puppet-master line. Clinton is more patsy than president, MHO. The impeachment proceedings are very destructive to our body politic/republic,

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-19 Thread Teo1000
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/19/98 7:21:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << The other plus is that this business just might get the Democrats back in control of Congress. Prudy >> That way there won't be any more bickering and the Dem.'s can sell all the techn

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-19 Thread PRUDYL
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/18/98 4:38:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Well this is interesting... Correct me if I am wrong but, once it goes to a vote and if he is impeached isn't there automatically a criminal trial? I understood that if he resigned and

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-18 Thread M. A. Johnson
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are 55 Republicans in the Senate, it will take 66 votes to convict. Conviction will not happen. Will there be a 'paralyzing' trial'? I believe that a natural defense for any later criminal trial would be 'double jeopardy'. I bel

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-18 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/18/98 2:22:19 PM, RoadsEnd wrote: >I believe Clinton has stated that he would not except a pardon for >his 'alleged' crimes. Ok, I meant accept -- I believe Clinton has stated that he would not accept a pardon for his 'alleged' crimes. Sorry, Om K DEC

Re: [CTRL] As Impeachment Looms, Clinton Seems In Denial (Reuters)

1998-12-18 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector- Hilary, There are 55 Republicans in the Senate, it will take 66 votes to convict. Conviction will not happen. Will there be a 'paralyzing' trial'? I believe that a natural defense for any later criminal trial would be 'double jeopardy'. I believe Clinton has stated that he would