On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, bycn82 wrote:
On 9/22/14 1:12, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
make: stopped in /usr/src/usr.sbin/npf/npfctl
I suspect that you have a corrupted source tree. Please take
this to current-users, not tech-kern.
Unlikely. I think he is just trying to build -current code on
6.
Updating src tree:
P src/etc/rc.subr
P src/etc/rc.d/network
P src/lib/libpci/Makefile
P src/lib/libpci/pci.h
P src/share/misc/airport
P src/sys/arch/amiga/amiga/disksubr.c
P src/sys/arch/amiga/dev/siop.c
P src/sys/arch/amiga/dev/siop2.c
P src/sys/arch/arm/arm32/pmap.c
P src/sys/arch/arm/iomd/iomd_
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
My goal is among others to be able to make a corresponding
operation given just a running NetBSD kernel and nothing in the
"standard paths". My common sense and experience say that the
standard tools are not applicable.
I am not sure that you under
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.NetBSD.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2014.09.21.15.07.19.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
/tmp/bracket/build/2014.09.21.15.07.19-i386/src/s
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 03:59:28PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:25:36AM +0200, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
> > This is not a duplication but a separate effort with different goals.
>
> But we fail to understand your goals.
Regrettably, this is somewhat hard to explain in
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
One of the assumptions in the NetBSD build system is that you
have the entire source tree
This is a quite large assumption :)
Of course. It's "NetBSD", not "the libc from NetBSD".
Another important assumption is that the build is run on a host wi
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 05:37:35PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 05:16:59PM +0200, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
> > I need also a standard NetBSD installation and several hundred MB sources,
> > don't I?
>
> No, not the former. Any posix-ish system will do.
I see. OTOH my syst
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:20:53PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
> >>might be some "restrictions/assumptions" nobody might have noticed or be
> >>willing to fix?
> >
> >Exactly. More often than not I happen to notice arbitrary restrictions and
> >assumptio
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 05:16:59PM +0200, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
> I need also a standard NetBSD installation and several hundred MB sources,
> don't I?
No, not the former. Any posix-ish system will do.
But the second is true, you need the full source tree. Not everything
of that will be used, an
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
might be some "restrictions/assumptions" nobody might have
noticed or be willing to fix?
Exactly. More often than not I happen to notice arbitrary
restrictions and assumptions which people tend to perceive as
natural.
One of the assumptions in the
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:25:36AM +0200, u-6...@aetey.se wrote:
> This is not a duplication but a separate effort with different goals.
But we fail to understand your goals.
All you need to do is:
- build.sh tools
- nbmake includes
- cd lib/libc && nbmake obj dependall install
or someth
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 05:22:59PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > The intention is to have an independent and self-contained toolchain, to
> > avoid any explicit or implicit restrictions/assumptions of the existing
> > building routines.
>
> I don't understand. You will work very, very har
12 matches
Mail list logo
