problems with different installations

Folks, I have cygwin installed on two systems. On one everything runs like a dream with no problems, on the other xfree runs like a dog, cygrunsrv (and windows services) time out whilst starting pretty much any service, and progres won't even run the initDB command. Here are the details of

name: GNU/Cygwin system

I'm not trolling (and maybe for all I know, this has already been talked out) but I wanted to suggest that it might be appropriate for Cygwin to describe and advertise itself as the "GNU/Cygwin system", giving credit where credit it very much due -- just as Debian does by describing itself as a "G

RE: umount doesn't umount

> -Original Message- > From: Gilgamesh Nootebos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:25 PM > To: cygwin > Subject: Re: umount doesn't umount > > > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > ':'s on NTFS allow alternate streams. Read up on that before > > speculating, and ple

Re: umount doesn't umount

Robert Collins wrote: > > ':'s on NTFS allow alternate streams. Read up on that before > speculating, and please remember that a single test case (your local > test) only shows the results for that exact configuration. > I just refreshed my memory with http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default

RE: PGP signatures for packages?

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:27 PM > > So, how would the Cygwin team feel about GPG-signing just these > two files? I'm the setup.exe maintainer. Here's what I need before I will sign setup.exe. (More on setup.in

RE: 1.1.3 and upwards: apparent bug with pthread_cond_wait() and/or signal()

> -Original Message- > From: Tim and Kathy Andvaag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:24 PM > $ nice -n -1 nice > 0 > > Yet the adjusted priorities are clearly occuring when you > look at the windows task manager? Rounding error IIRC. The +-20 that unix uses

Re: PGP signatures for packages?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Currently, setup.ini contains md5 hashes for each tarball. The released > version of setup.exe successfully ignores those md5's, but the HEAD will Doh! I should have noticed that. That's great! If the

Re: 1.1.3 and upwards: apparent bug with pthread_cond_wait() and/or signal()

>> Between 1.1.3 and 1.3.0 a huge change occurred in the pthreads code >> base, so this assumption is not safe. (It's not necessarily wrong >> either.) I'd definitely be using 1.3.10 though. >> >> > #include >> > #include >> >> The cygwin c++ libgcc, stdlibc++ and gcc are not built with thread >

RE: PGP signatures for packages?

> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:43 PM > >I saw a note back in December > >(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-12/msg00950.html) > >that touched on this, but I couldn't find any followup. Did this > >withe

RE: Re: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

> -Original Message- > From: Michael A Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:41 AM > > If you want to leverage those files, move the contrib/* > ands latest/* > > directories to release/*. > > Does that mean setup.exe is going to stop finding files under

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

Thanks for the explanation; I won't send my laptop back yet, although I'm still having problems with "Download Incomplete Retry?" with 2.218.2.9, but by now, I may have screwed up something else (like maybe HOME has gotten undefined, or such) since I have been installed and uninstalled maybe 25 ti

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

Chuck, Thanks for the excellent summary of events. I too was wondering what happened, since this is the first time I've seen the setup program so unstable and re-released so often. Your explanation clears it all up for me now. Also, FWIW, my problems with setup.exe are all gone now since

Re: PGP signatures for packages?

Michael Young wrote: > Are signatures available for the setup program, or for the packages it > downloads? > RPM uses GPG signatures, but I can't find anything comparable for the Cygwin > binaries. Even just a list of hashes would be worthwhile (ideally vended from > a secure Cygwin/Redhat web pa

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

John Haggerty wrote: > > If you're going to work on this, could you leave a working version in > place while you do so, and try it before posting it? Thanks. > Long story: (1) In order to allow HEAD testing to go forward with md5sums, there was a minor change to the 'stable release' of setu

Re: bash question

You asked this in the wrong place btw, (I think its a bash specific questing) but here goes anyways: #!/bin/bash i=0 for x in 1 2 3; do let i=i+1 echo "item $x" done echo "Processed $i items" cat > /tmp/file

Re: PGP signatures for packages?

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:26:30PM -0400, Michael Young wrote: >Are signatures available for the setup program, or for the packages it >downloads? >RPM uses GPG signatures, but I can't find anything comparable for the Cygwin >binaries. Even just a list of hashes would be worthwhile (ideally vende

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken and I'm not much better (completely off-topic)

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:29:13PM +0600, Dockeen wrote: >I forgot to mention in my last email, I am going senile. > >Next thing you know, someone will be telling me Reagan >isn't president any more. I was listening to a local radio show today and the newscaster said something like "It was report

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken and I'm not much better

On Thu, 16 May 2002 22:29:13 +0600 Dockeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I forgot to mention in my last email, I am going senile. > > Next thing you know, someone will be telling me Reagan > isn't president any more. True, Reagan isn't President, but Bush is. So you aren't doing so bad. -- Ma

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

Hi, Well thanks, that calmed me down. I have installed cygwin maybe 50 times on different machines, but last night it was my luck to really, really want to install it on my newly repaired laptop, and I spent maybe 4 hours doing this: - start: - Install Cygwin NOW! from www.cygwin.com, copy setu

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken and I'm not much better

I forgot to mention in my last email, I am going senile. Next thing you know, someone will be telling me Reagan isn't president any more. Wayne (Huckleberry Dumb-poop) Keen -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Docu

PGP signatures for packages?

Are signatures available for the setup program, or for the packages it downloads? RPM uses GPG signatures, but I can't find anything comparable for the Cygwin binaries. Even just a list of hashes would be worthwhile (ideally vended from a secure Cygwin/Redhat web page) to verify that a mirror (or

Re: QUESTION: How to start up PostgreSQL within cygwin?

Hello fellows, First at all, sorry for the late response. I have been very busy this week due the birth of my second daughter. Thanks to all who answered my pray :-) If someone else downloads the cygipc program, it should be at the folder \CygWin\install so The rigt command shall be: $ tar -jxv

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:56:28PM +0600, Dockeen wrote: >Preamble: >I don't work at Cygnus, I am just another user. (Well, maybe less >skilled that any other user) Obligatory reply: Actually, nobody works at Cygnus anymore. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpl

setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

Preamble: I don't work at Cygnus, I am just another user. (Well, maybe less skilled that any other user) Why I am writing: I have been upgrading Cygwin essentially daily on my work and home machines, using the newest setup almost all the time, and I have almost never seen a failure. This can NOT

Re: umount doesn't umount

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:12:04AM +0200, Gilgamesh Nootebos wrote: > David E Euresti wrote: > > > > >I think it doesn't like the colon. Any ideas? > > > > W2K PRO NL shows this: > > D:\temp>mkdir foo:bar > De mapnaam is ongeldig. > > Which is Dutch for: "The directory name is invalid" Whew.

Re: setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:04PM -0400, John Haggerty wrote: >As far as I can see, setup 2.218.2.8 and 2.218.2.9 are still broken, as >described on this list. > >In case it's not clear, you go through an entire download, and the last >thing to be downloaded reports "Download Incomplete" on a p

setup.exe 2.218.2.8/9 broken

As far as I can see, setup 2.218.2.8 and 2.218.2.9 are still broken, as described on this list. In case it's not clear, you go through an entire download, and the last thing to be downloaded reports "Download Incomplete" on a popup, and as far as I can see, you can never correctly install Cygwi

Re: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

On Fri, 17 May 2002 08:21:06 +1000 Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael A Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:11 AM > > > Directories contrib\ and latest\ are obsolescent, but may > > still have useful files u

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: diffutils-2.8.1-1

I've made a new version of 'diffutils' available for download. This updates the package to the latest version available from ftp.gnu.org. The 'diffutils' package replaces the previous 'diff' package. For a brief descripton of this package, see http://cygwin.com/packages/ . To update your instal

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: make-3.79.1-7

I've made a new version of make available for download. This version incorporates a patch reported by a cygwin mailing list user to fix problems with vpath and win32 paths. There is also a change which allows make to default to win32 mode if /bin/sh is missing. This means that make will use 'co

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: findutils-4.1.7-2

I've made a new version of 'findutils' available for download. This updates the package to the latest version available from ftp.gnu.org. This version is notable in that it seems to include a working version of 'updatedb'. For a brief descripton of this package, see http://cygwin.com/packages/ .

Re: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 08:04:42AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >>On the other hand, would it be a good idea for setup.exe to tag its >>directories in some way, like with a zero-byte file, so that it doesn't >>take just any old setup.ini file it finds? > >Mmmm. I'll think about this. I don't wan

RE: umount doesn't umount

> -Original Message- > From: Gilgamesh Nootebos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:12 AM ... ':'s on NTFS allow alternate streams. Read up on that before speculating, and please remember that a single test case (your local test) only shows the results for that ex

bash question

I may have asked this before but I'd really like to understand this and get a fix for it. Given the following script: #!/bin/bash declare -i i=0 for x in 1 2 3; do let i=i+1 echo "item $x" done echo "Processed $i items" cat > /tmp/file

Re: umount doesn't umount

David E Euresti wrote: > > I think it doesn't like the colon. Any ideas? > W2K PRO NL shows this: D:\temp>mkdir foo:bar De mapnaam is ongeldig. D:\temp> Which is Dutch for: "The directory name is invalid" IIRC a ':' is only valid when adressing a Drive and cannot be used in Directory nam

Re: umount doesn't umount

At 06:49 PM 5/16/2002, David E Euresti wrote: >Anybody know why this happens? > >$ mount c: /blah:c >mount: warning - /blah:c does not exist. > >$cd /blah:c > >$ cd /blah:c >bash: cd: /blah:c: No such file or directory > >$mount >C:\cygwin\bin on /usr/bin type system (binmode) >C:\cygwin\lib on /u

umount doesn't umount

Anybody know why this happens? $ mount c: /blah:c mount: warning - /blah:c does not exist. $cd /blah:c $ cd /blah:c bash: cd: /blah:c: No such file or directory $mount C:\cygwin\bin on /usr/bin type system (binmode) C:\cygwin\lib on /usr/lib type system (binmode) C:\cygwin on / type system (bi

RE: Re: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

> -Original Message- > From: Michael A Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:11 AM > Directories contrib\ and latest\ are obsolescent, but may > still have useful files under them. If you want to leverage those files, move the contrib/* ands latest/* directo

Re: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

On Fri, 17 May 2002 03:31:36 +0800 D G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Harig, Mark A." > >I think I see now. I was simply letting 'setup.exe' use its defaults. > >It defaults to using 'c:\cygwin' for the Root Install Directory and > >'c:\cygwin' for the Local Package Directory. I assumed

RE: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

> -Original Message- > From: D G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:32 AM > OK. For those of us who did it the "wrong" way (mine is set > to H:\), how can I change the local package directory and > still keep all the current package information? Is it > auto

RE: Using cygwin DLLs in no-cygwin applications

Hi Thomas, It's been quite a while since I've last seen Pascal, and fine if it works, but do you want gzip or bzip2? Your code uses gzip, prefixing variables bz doesn't matter! OK, not cygwin specific, but you might have overlooked... Bye, Heribert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > -Original Message--

Re: Possible error in cygpath

On Wed, 15 May 2002, Joerg R. Schaible wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:44:51AM +0200, Schaible, Jorg wrote: > > > The reason why I just implemented -s (in 1999)

two installs one works; one doesn't

I have cygwin, cygwin-xfree, and postgres installed on two Win2K systems. The first is a W2K Professional on a Toshiba Laptop, the second is a W2K Advanced Server on a desktop. The first works like grease lightening, the second runs like a dog in xfree and postgres (indeed I can't even run initDB

RE: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

At 03:31 PM 5/16/2002, D G wrote: >OK. For those of us who did it the "wrong" way (mine is set to H:\), how can I >change the local package directory and still keep all the current package >information? Is it automatic? What about the "latest" and "contrib" directories? >Are those obsolete?

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account: r e s o l v e d :-)

Corinna schrieb: >> I will try to find a solution some more days and if there is a way to >> use PublicKey Auth with RSA SSH1 and DSA SSH2 enabled and >> PasswordAuthentication no >> I will find it;) > Am I wrong or didn't you read my message, answering to your problems: > http://cygwin.c

RE: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

From: "Harig, Mark A." >I think I see now. I was simply letting 'setup.exe' use its defaults. >It defaults to using 'c:\cygwin' for the Root Install Directory and >'c:\cygwin' for the Local Package Directory. I assumed that setup was >searching in the '/' directory tree, but that was just a co

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .netenterprise server)

Ok, I have used both I am sure, on the host key side. I have not tried via the users. If I get a chance in the next few, I will tinker around with it and let you know what I find. On Thu, 16 May 2002, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Prentis schrieb: > > > I think these docs are out of date. this

Re: apache and php4 out-of-the-box

> Yup! See the following: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00582.html > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00614.html ok. i could pass that thing. simply had to change some paths in the postinastall script and run it again. it didn't gave me any error during

cygwin freezes on W98

Hi, after installing cygwin on W98, I can open bash on Cygwin/XFree86 and start working for a short while. Then it freezes. Is there anyone who could help me with this? = Antonio F Fortes UnB, Bloco J, Apt. 407 70919-970 - Brasilia, DF Brasil _

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server)

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:10:03PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > I am debugging this about two weeks now, every day an hour or so. I > want to use DSA & SSH2 and it works. But when I changed back the > sshd_config to 'RSAAuthentication yes' because a collegue wants to use > RSA (he just has RS

Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server

Ok, I typed too fast... none is supposed to be known... sorry On Thu, 16 May 2002, Prentis Brooks wrote: > Ok, The setgid is a none error to me. This happens when the passwd > files are not built properly. Not your fault, some interesting Windows > installations give mkpasswd and mkgroup head

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server)

Prentis schrieb: > I think these docs are out of date. this is fixed now, since I am > doing it. Ok. PublicKey is working, I figured out to set it up with PublicKey Auth only and using my DSA key and only allowed protocol was SSH2. I know that and that is the reason why I'm still trying to fi

cygwin freezes on W98

Hi, after installing cygwin on W98, I can open Cygwin/Xfree86 and Bash for a short time. The it freezes. Is there anyone who could help me with this? Thanks. = Antonio F Fortes UnB, Bloco J, Apt. 407 70919-970 - Brasilia, DF Brasil __ Do Yo

Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server

Ok, The setgid is a none error to me. This happens when the passwd files are not built properly. Not your fault, some interesting Windows installations give mkpasswd and mkgroup headaches, particularly on Domain Controllers. If you check your /etc/passwd and /etc/group, you will find one of t

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .netenterprise server)

I think these docs are out of date. this is fixed now, since I am doing it. On Thu, 16 May 2002, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Inc) schrieb: > > >>I did copy him on the original note so he would be aware of the issue, > >>but at this point I have completely removed his version (including > >>delet

Problem with gdb and DLLs and their symbols when setting breakpoints

Hi === Maybe it is a little bit offtopic, but maybe somewhere knows also what to do. I posted the same mail to the gdb mailinglist as well. === I am working on a rather bi

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .netenterprise server)

Ok, Maybe I missed something but some of the docs you are looking at must be old, as I am running sshd under the system account, logging in via Password, RSA, and even .shosts (with RSA Host auth). Now, I am doing this on NT4.0, 2000 Professional, 2000 Server, and 2000 Advanced Server. I am not

RE: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server

Larry Hall wrote: > > I did copy him on the original note so he would be aware of > > the issue, but at this point I have completely removed his > > version (including deleting registry keys) and installed the > > cygwin environment. It appears that all of cygwin works when > > run in a system own

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server)

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:10:03PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >I will try to find a solution some more days and if there is a way to >use PublicKey Auth with RSA SSH1 and DSA SSH2 enabled and >PasswordAuthentication no >I will find it;) I like that determination! :-) cgf -- Unsubscribe

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server)

Larry, >> > Can you please acknowledge whether or not you read openssh*.README so that >> > we know whether you've missed the obvious user rights settings necessary for >> > the administrator account? >> >>I read it and still have similar problems and there is this: > I'm glad you read it Gerri

Re: SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server)

At 01:11 PM 5/16/2002, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Inc) schrieb: > > >>I did copy him on the original note so he would be aware of the issue, > >>but at this point I have completely removed his version (including > >>deleting registry keys) and installed the cygwin environment. It appears > >>that all

Re: [PATCH] texi2dvi bug

Richard schrieb: > Can you please tell me how to unsubscribe to this > I am having unbelievable problems Problems reading english? > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple This is attached at every mail and you can only read it yourself. I cannot write you s.th.

SSHD under SYSTEM account (was: Re: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server)

Inc) schrieb: >>I did copy him on the original note so he would be aware of the issue, >>but at this point I have completely removed his version (including >>deleting registry keys) and installed the cygwin environment. It appears >>that all of cygwin works when run in a system owned command wind

Re: Come see my cam

Christopher, et al -- ...and then Christopher Faylor said... % % On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:07:37AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > ... % >Is there a particular reason this list is open and thus gets this junk? % >I think that asking folks who have questions about cygwin to sign up, % >however brief

Re: Come see my cam

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:07:37AM -0500, David T-G wrote: >Hi, all -- > >...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... >% >% Sweet college bitches ready to party!! > >Is there a particular reason this list is open and thus gets this junk? >I think that asking folks who have questions about cygwin to sig

RE: New setup uploaded - 2.218.2.8

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:05 PM > > > -Original Message- > > From: Harig, Mark A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:42 AM > > > > Should this behavior of setup.exe's se

[PATCH] texi2dvi bug

Hallo, Obviously this is a bug in texi2dvi: $ diff -urdb /usr/bin/texi2dvi~ /usr/bin/texi2dvi --- /usr/bin/texi2dvi~ 2002-05-16 16:49:09.0 +0200 +++ /usr/bin/texi2dvi 2002-05-16 16:49:09.0 +0200 @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ elif echo "$PATH" | grep ':.*:' 2>/dev/null; then path_s

Re: Come see my cam

Hi, all -- ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % % Sweet college bitches ready to party!! Is there a particular reason this list is open and thus gets this junk? I think that asking folks who have questions about cygwin to sign up, however briefly, is not out of line... TIA & HAND :-D --

Regarding loadkeys utility.

Hi all, can somebody explain how to get loadkeys utility installed under cygwin.which option should be selected for this when running setup.In linux i get this utility in the /etc/rc.d/ directory. but there's no such hierarchial directory structure in cygwin. yamuna. ___

Re: 1.3.10 release/installer 2.218.2.8 not working

At 12:46 AM 5/16/2002, Derek Botfield wrote: >I am unable to get the latest cygwin installed. All >kinds of binaries (such as cp, id and touch etc.) are >missing. Nevertheless I need a working version of >cygwin and I know that B20 installed flawlessly. Where >can I get a copy of B20 (or even B20.

RE: cygwin & opensshd on .net enterprise server

At 01:57 AM 5/16/2002, Tony Hain wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > I am looking for any clues on how to make cygwin & opensshd > > > work on a .net enterprise server, and found nothing in the > > > mail archive. I had been running Mark's opensshd specific > > > environment on W2k server with

[OT: Perl] RE: Better solution for calling 'net use' from Cygwin Perl?

This is just a Perl, tid-bit, so disregard if you're not interested in Perl arcana. > -Original Message- > You might also want to keep any shells from getting involved with your > arguments; they sometimes treat '\' badly: > > my $share = "//storigen1u21/sfstest"; > $share =~ s,\\,/,g; >

Re: locate and it's db

It was I who came up with that dirty substitute. It's worth noting that it doesn't do anything the *real* updatedb script does like pruning and ignoring /tmp and the like. Also, you'll have to mkdir /usr/var in your cygwin installation unless you set the LOCATE_PATH environment variable. -rg

Re: script or nmap?

At 12:20 AM 5/16/2002, dave wrote: > Hi, > Are either of the above apps working with cygwin? >Thanks. http://cygwin.com/packages/ Look here with these kinds of questions. Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www

Come see my cam

Sweet college bitches ready to party!! http://hosting24-7.org/liveonline/zoolife/ These crazy sluts are ready to FUCK ALL SUMMER LONG! cya! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http:/

RE: Changes in latest snapshot

Something that you could have done: Change ~/.cvspass, ~/.cvsrc, and all */CVS/* files in your sandboxes to Unix format. You might also need change other files, e.g. */.cvsignore, and you might want to change some or all text files in your sandboxes. Nothing mysterious here, it's just that many U

RE: Helpful Bug Reporting (setup.exe)

> -Original Message- > From: Dockeen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Helpful Bug Reporting (setup.exe) > > > When you are reporting an error, try to think like someone > who is trying to solve the problem! In the

Re: apache and php4 out-of-the-box

Michael, On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:07:23PM -0400, Michael Kunze wrote: > but now i run nto th next problem with my apache installation: > > C:\cygwin\usr\sbin\httpd.exe: *** unable to remap > C:\cygwin\bin\cygintl-1.dll to same address as parent -- 0x1A6F > > [snip] > has it something to d

Using cygwin DLLs in no-cygwin applications

Hi all, a while ago I tried to include some legacy FORTRAN and C code into a DELPHI project of mine. Building a DLL (according to Mummit Khan's description) seemed the way to go. Under Cygwin, this ended up admiring SIGSEGVs all over the place. Under MinGW, however, everything worked out fine (S

RE: New setup.exe 2.218.2.9 available (was Postinstall not working, setup.exe 2.218.2.8)

> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New setup.exe 2.218.2.9 available (was > Postinstall not working, setup.exe 2.218.2.8) > > > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:35:49AM -04

1.3.10: large files reported incorrectly (XP)

On Thursday 16 May 02, Dmitri Loguinov writes: > I have two large (16 GB and 18 GB) tar files on an NTFS partition in Windows > XP. When I list the files in cygwin, I get the following: > > -rw-r--r--1 Dmitri Administ 478821376 Dec 18 22:15 unix1.tar > -rw-r--r--1 Dmitri Administ 1844