[Just closing out all of these discussions]
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:10:55PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:00:10PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote:
>Could that explain why Bill still sees the problem with his 2002-11-14
>snapshot?
I downloaded the latest v
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:25:11PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote:
>--- David Starks-Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Friday 15 Nov 02, Bill Priest writes:
>>>if TERM = linux inside rxvt (windows version) then emacs hangs while
>>>loading the lisp files; status line freezes on "Loading
>>>interna
Steve,
I've been investigating the recent report of a "hang" in rxvt
when you do something like this:
TERM=linux emacx-nox -q
AFAICT, the problem is that the linux terminfo has some escape sequences
that, IMO, rxvt is interpreting incorrectly. Specifically, rxvt seems
to be interpreting '^[[?c
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:49:27PM -0800, Erik Larson wrote:
>There appears to be a bug in the setup hints / setup.ini for the package
>rsync. It is dependent on the package libpopt0, but that is missing in
>the requires line.
>
>The current requires line reads:
>requires: cygwin
>
>It should be
There appears to be a bug in the setup hints / setup.ini for the package
rsync. It is dependent on the package libpopt0, but that is missing in
the requires line.
The current requires line reads:
requires: cygwin
It should be:
requires: cygwin libpopt0
Thanks,
Erik
--
Unsubscribe info:
Mark,
This doesn't seem very possible, unless you want any user on the machine
to be able to either run as LocalSystem or access the registry keys for
LocalSystem...
Igor
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Harig, Mark A. wrote:
> It would also be useful if the 'cygcheck -s'
> had displayed that this m
I've made a new version of gcc available for download. This is a
minor bug fix release. The -nostdinc switch should now remove
/usr/include/w32api.
To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on
the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downloads setup.exe to your
system. T
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:00:10PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote:
>> >> Could that explain why Bill still sees the
>> problem
>> >> with his 2002-11-14
>> >> snapshot?
>> >
>> >I downloaded the latest version on 11/15 and still
>> >reproduced the problem.
>>
>> cygcheck output?
>
>See attached.
If thi
I know this subject has been on the list a lot, but even from reading
the archives I've not been able to figure out what's going wrong. I am
trying to compile SDL_mixer with Ogg Vorbis support. I downloaded,
compiled and installed the Vorbis libraries with no problem. That's
what I thought
Francis Litterio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using Cygwin 1.3.12-4 with CYGWIN=ntsec on an NTFS filesystem,
> and I have my umask set to 177, but when I create a new file with
> "touch foo", the permissions on the file are "rwxr-xr-x".
>
> Is there any way to use "ntsec" and not have all newl
I'm using Cygwin 1.3.12-4 with CYGWIN=ntsec on an NTFS filesystem, and I
have my umask set to 177, but when I create a new file with "touch foo",
the permissions on the file are "rwxr-xr-x".
Is there any way to use "ntsec" and not have all newly created files
appear with execute permissions?
--
Fr
On 16-11-2002 0:25, Bill Priest wrote:
--- David Starks-Browning wrote:
>But the default for rxvt is "xterm". Why are you
>using "linux"? Have
>you tried using the default "xterm"?
Yes, xterm works fine. But linux used to work. I
used
linux because a lot of the time I rlogin into my linux
--- David Starks-Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 Nov 02, Bill Priest writes:
> > All,
> > Another piece of the puzzle.
> >
> > if TERM = linux inside rxvt (windows version) then
> > emacs hangs while loading the lisp files; status
> line
> > freezes on "Loading internationa
> >> Could that explain why Bill still sees the
> problem
> >> with his 2002-11-14
> >> snapshot?
> >
> >I downloaded the latest version on 11/15 and still
> >reproduced the problem.
>
> cygcheck output?
See attached.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:35:22PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>>On Friday 15 Nov 02, Bill Priest writes:
>>> All,
>>> Another piece of the puzzle.
>>>
>>> if TERM = linux inside rxvt (windows version) then
>>> emacs
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Friday 15 Nov 02, Bill Priest writes:
>> All,
>> Another piece of the puzzle.
>>
>> if TERM = linux inside rxvt (windows version) then
>> emacs hangs while loading the lisp files; status line
>> freezes on "Loading inte
On Friday 15 Nov 02, Bill Priest writes:
> All,
> Another piece of the puzzle.
>
> if TERM = linux inside rxvt (windows version) then
> emacs hangs while loading the lisp files; status line
> freezes on "Loading international/mule-cmds..."
OK, there is indeed something wierd going on with TER
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:00:48PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote:
>
>--- David Starks-Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday 15 Nov 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
>> > Note that there were multiple snapshots generated
>> yesterday so if you
>> > grabbed one and it didn't work, it's worthwhile
I checked the 20021114-23:36:56 snapshot at home and
can confirm that it solves my serial problem on W98SE:
m68k-palmos-gdb is talking to my palm again.
Thanks Chris (and Sergey) for the patch.
Ton van Overbeek
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
--- David Starks-Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 Nov 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
> > Note that there were multiple snapshots generated
> yesterday so if you
> > grabbed one and it didn't work, it's worthwhile to
> grab the latest.
>
> Multiple versions dated 2002-11-14?
>
>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:52:58PM -0500, Harig, Mark A. wrote:
>It would also be useful if the 'cygcheck -s' had displayed that this
>mount point existed.
It would be REALLY helpful if we had as many programmers working on the
project as we did people with helpful suggestions.
I can envision a n
It would also be useful if the 'cygcheck -s'
had displayed that this mount point existed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Johannes.Schindelin@;gmx.de]
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SSHD on NT4... (SOLVED!!!)
>
>
>
http://strappone.arecool.net
portale per adulti...
http://strappone.arecool.net
migliaia di foto e filmati
di bellissime ragazze...
troverai tutto ciò che cerchi
per non ricevere altre newsletter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug repo
Hi,
after updating to the latest version of Cygwin (1.3.15-1) including
all other modules, rshd wouldn't accept my .rhosts file anymore
because it's owned by the wrong owner. The error message is
"permission denied (bad .rhosts owner)."
The reason for this is obvious: I turned off ntsec, thus
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:21:22PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>> The official cygwin copy of Larry Wall's "patch" program is mired at
>> version 2.5.0 (which was released way back in 1997). The currently
>> released version is 2.5.4 (which is still from 1999). 2.5.8 is available
>> from
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:22:26PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Or best of all, can the package - I'm unsure why setting up sshd causes
>so many problems for some people. Certainly its never misbehaved for
>me.
Ditto.
I believe that I've previously suggested that if there were improvements
in ssh
Mark Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here. Sorry if there is some confusion. Frankly, considering the
> number of installs I think the confusion has been minimal. As a side
> note I've many times been in conversation with a user and suggested
> that it might be time to can the package as
> The official cygwin copy of Larry Wall's "patch" program is mired at
> version 2.5.0 (which was released way back in 1997). The currently
> released version is 2.5.4 (which is still from 1999). 2.5.8 is available
> from the ftp://alpha.gnu.org website
>From searching the cygwin-annouce mailing
Thank you all for your help!
The problem was a "mount -u e:/ /" for the SYSTEM user. I think this came
from an ancient installation of sshd1 with an ancient cygwin. Where are these
stored? I tried to remove it in the registry, but to no avail. I had to start
an interactive cmd ("at 12:00 /interact
According to the 'cygcheck' output,
this had already been done:
. /cygdrive usertextmode,cygdrive
d:\cygwin / system textmode
d:\cygwin/bin /usr/bin system textmode
d:\cygwin/lib /usr/lib system textmode
. /cygdrive usertextmode,
I don't understand completely the logic behind STL headers...
e.g. there is that uses
and there is too
but there isn't and , though the "stl_*" version is
there to be used.
Is this normal/expected?
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ
mount -s d:/cygwin /
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Johannes.Schindelin@;gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSHD on NT4...
Hi,
the tip with "at xx:yy /interactive cmd" helped!
I now only have the problem that I know t
Hi,
the tip with "at xx:yy /interactive cmd" helped!
I now only have the problem that I know that only Administrator gets the
right root directory (d:\cygwin), but all the others only get a wrong one (e:\).
My WINNT is installed on E:\, because I cannot have a bigger C:\ (no BIOS,
but a PROM, so
Gary,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:40:07PM +, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> All I got out was one error line per DLL stating that it was being
> skipped because it was not rebasable.
Are you running on Me? If so, then you can't use my rebase (don't blame
me, blame Microsoft). Use Ralf's version ins
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote:
> > I just noticed that the original installer does not have
> > any entry for Cygwin under HKEY_USERS whereas the other
> > user does. Curious.
> > -Norton
>
> Ah, there's your problem! This was the guess I expresse
Ralf,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> > The following is the only required diff (besides the expected ones)
> > to PostgreSQL's contrib/start-scripts/linux:
>
> Does that means the next postgresql release contains an rc... file,
> which is a link or copy of the ab
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > Hmm, don't know if there is a way in NT to restrict access to HKLM
> > registry entries, but it certainly sounds like the second user doesn't see
> > these entries... This might not matter, but is either of them a domain
> >
Here. Sorry if there is some confusion. Frankly, considering the number of
installs I think the confusion has been minimal. As a side note I've many
times been in conversation with a user and suggested that it might be time
to can the package as no longer necessary. EVERY time they vehemently
p
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> Hmm, don't know if there is a way in NT to restrict access to HKLM
> registry entries, but it certainly sounds like the second user doesn't see
> these entries... This might not matter, but is either of them a domain
> user, by any chance?
>
> > > I'm assuming, of course
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote:
> > > It is possible that I was a logged in as a different user for the second
> > > install, but it isn't clear how that would affect setup, since these are
> > > system mounts.
>
On Friday 15 Nov 02, Bill Priest writes:
> I've tried this with the cygwin1-20021114.dll.bz2
> snapshot as well as the net release.
Are you sure that you're using the 2002-11-14 snapshot? Did
you rename it to cygwin1.dll, replacing the previous one?
Because that snapshot fixes all those problems
Hi,
the previous mail was really written by me. The signature was
probably broken by the automatic cygwin-announce -> cygwin mailing
list forwarding.
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D
All,
Another piece of the puzzle.
if TERM = linux inside rxvt (windows version) then
emacs hangs while loading the lisp files; status line
freezes on "Loading international/mule-cmds..."
if TERM = cygwin inside rxvt (windows version) then
emacs displays the first character on the far right.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig0718874616ED40B05ADC8103
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This is an update release for the cygwin gnupg package. See:
< http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-anno
The official cygwin copy of Larry Wall's "patch" program is mired at
version 2.5.0 (which was released way back in 1997). The currently
released version is 2.5.4 (which is still from 1999). 2.5.8 is available
from the ftp://alpha.gnu.org website
The main reason I'm mentioning is that 2.5.4 is ne
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote:
> > It is possible that I was a logged in as a different user for the second
> > install, but it isn't clear how that would affect setup, since these are
> > system mounts.
>
> Just a WAG, but does that other user have user mou
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote:
> On 15 Nov 2002 at 11:37, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > The above is standard setup behavior. Setup simply unpacks the files
> > from a package to the directories from which they have been packaged.
> > It also reads the mount table and resolves directory
New News:
===
I have updated the version of PostgreSQL to 7.2.3-2. The tarballs should
be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
This version is built against cygipc 1.13-2 which means initdb and
postmaster will no longer hang consuming all available CPU cycles if
ipc-daemon is not r
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.2.2-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The _socket module is still being built static instead of shared to
workaround a fork() issue with DLL base address conflicts. See the
README for more details
New News:
===
I have updated the version of fetchmail to 6.1.2-1. The tarballs should
be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
Old News:
===
Fetchmail is a remote mail retrieval and forwarding utility intended
for use over on-demand TCP/IP links, like SLIP or PPP connections.
F
Gary,
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On Friday 15 Nov 2002 4:12 pm, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >
> > I don't know much about rebase, but I do have a few minor comments related
> > to cygwin. See below.
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > First off, non-cygwin programs will at best se
On 15 Nov 2002 at 11:37, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> The above is standard setup behavior. Setup simply unpacks the files
> from a package to the directories from which they have been packaged.
> It also reads the mount table and resolves directory references
> (cygfile:// is setup's way of indica
>Is there some way in Windows to trace the service startup in a useful
manner?
"at XX:YY /interactive cmd"
The command prompt window running with a local system account will
appear on the screen at XX hrs YY mins.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting
The setup is very idiosyncratic. According to the
cygcheck output, most of Cygwin is installed
on the D drive (NTFS), but there are two cygwin1.dlls
one on the D drive and one on the E drive (FAT).
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergei Okhapkin [mailto:sokhapkin@;LEAPSTONE.com]
> Sent: Frid
Hello,
I notice this several month old posting (17 Jul 2002), and find it is
related to problems I experienced myself recently, and I'd wish to
avoid in a next attempt (my host has been reinstalled in-between).
> "MH" == Manzoorul Hassan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MH> I would like to instal
Hi Igor,
On Friday 15 Nov 2002 4:12 pm, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> Gary,
>
> I don't know much about rebase, but I do have a few minor comments related
> to cygwin. See below.
>
[snip]
>
> First off, non-cygwin programs will at best see \cygwin\usr\bin as empty,
> and at worst it won't exist at a
Hi,
> Looks like cygrunsrv or sshd have no execution permissions for local
> system account.
Yes, it looks like that, but on the other hand, I can execute both as
another user (me), and running them as service as another user (me) fails all the
same.
> Or cygwin1.dll is unaccessible to that acco
Or cygwin1.dll is unaccessible to that account...
-Original Message-
From: Sergei Okhapkin
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SSHD on NT4...
Looks like cygrunsrv or sshd have no execution permissions for local system account.
Looks like cygrunsrv or sshd have no execution permissions for local system account.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Johannes.Schindelin@;gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SSHD on NT4...
Hi,
> Are there some errors in
Hi,
> Are there some errors in the application event log wheh sshd runs as a
> service?
Yes. An Error: Something about Event-ID 0 (Description not found). At the
end it says "starting service `sshd' failed: execv: 255, error 255." And an
information that sshd stopped.
It is in German, so I don'
What is the output of 'ls -ln /etc/ssh*'?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Johannes.Schindelin@;gmx.de]
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: SSHD on NT4...
>
>
> Hi,
>
> my permissions are
>
> -rw-rw-rw-1 SYSTEM K
Are there some errors in the application event log wheh sshd runs as a service?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Johannes.Schindelin@;gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SSHD on NT4...
Hi,
my permissions are
-rw-rw-rw-
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:01:11PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Aargh! NetworkSimplicity SSH rears its ugly head once again.
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm seriously beginning to think that setup.exe should detect
> a "NetworkSimplicity" installation and nuke it. Seriously.
Hi,
my permissions are
-rw-rw-rw-1 SYSTEM Kein [...] /etc/ssh_config
-rw---1 SYSTEM Kein [...] /etc/ssh_host_dsa_key
-rw-r--r--1 SYSTEM Kein [...] /etc/ssh_host_dsa_key.pub
-rw---1 SYSTEM Kein [...] /etc/ssh_host_key
-rw-r--r--1 SYSTEM Kein [...] /etc/ssh_hos
> 2. Have you recently changed the contents of /etc/passwd?
>
> No
>
>What are the permissions and ownership of this file?
>
> -rwx--1 Administ None 658 Sep 16 13:37 /etc/passwd*
>
Check the last two fields of your entry in /etc/passwd.
>What are the permissions and o
>
> > What is the output of "ls -l /etc/ssh*" and "ls -l
> /usr/sbin/sshd.exe"?
> > Please check the rwx attributes of /etc, /usr and /usr/sbin
> directories.
>
> These are all "drwxrwxrwx".
>
The /etc/ssh_host*key files should be set to 600, not 777.
None of the other /etc/ssh* configuration
Hi,
> What is the output of "ls -l /etc/ssh*" and "ls -l /usr/sbin/sshd.exe"?
> Please check the rwx attributes of /etc, /usr and /usr/sbin directories.
These are all "drwxrwxrwx".
> mount -m | grep cygwin
Yields
mount -f -s -t "d:/cygwin/bin" "/usr/bin"
mount -f -s -t "d:/cygwin/lib" "/usr/li
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote:
> I have spent some time looking for a reference to this problem, but have not
> come across it.
>
> OS: Win2K
> Installed cygwin via setup (both download and install), pretty much accepted the
> defaults. Installed to C:\cygwin. Worked well.
>
> Returned a
What is the output of "ls -l /etc/ssh*" and "ls -l /usr/sbin/sshd.exe"? Please check
the rwx attributes of /etc, /usr and /usr/sbin directories.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Johannes.Schindelin@;gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I attached the /etc/group file also, because the files which normally
> > > should belong to group "SYSTEM" now all belong to "Kein", maybe that
> > > helps?
> >
> > Which files do you mean? Didn't chown help? Any hint in
> > /var/log/ss
Hi,
> Check services's configuration files permissions. I bet local system
> account has no read access to the configuration files.
If you mean /etc/ssh*, they all belong to SYSTEM.SYSTEM (I also tried other
combinations; none help).
If you don't, which do you mean?
Ciao,
Dscho
--
+++ GMX -
I have spent some time looking for a reference to this problem, but have not
come across it.
OS: Win2K
Installed cygwin via setup (both download and install), pretty much accepted the
defaults. Installed to C:\cygwin. Worked well.
Returned a few weeks later to add a few more packages. Setup appea
Check services's configuration files permissions. I bet local system account has no
read access to the configuration files.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Johannes.Schindelin@;gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSHD on
Gary,
I don't know much about rebase, but I do have a few minor comments related
to cygwin. See below.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Friday 15 Nov 2002 2:01 pm, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Gary,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:32:49PM +, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > > I've ha
Hi,
> > I attached the /etc/group file also, because the files which normally
> > should belong to group "SYSTEM" now all belong to "Kein", maybe that
> > helps?
>
> Which files do you mean? Didn't chown help? Any hint in
> /var/log/sshd.log or in the WIndows event log?
The files I meant are /e
On Friday 15 Nov 2002 2:01 pm, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Gary,
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:32:49PM +, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > I've had a look at the archives and found many references to rebase,
> > but can't sus out exactly what I need to do - how to find out what
> > params to pass to rebas
Hello,
Can anybody help me to find some information about GNU version numbering
scheme?
I'm looking for a guideline, 'cause I've found out, that sometimes even
myself I couldn't tell what means the version of this or that program,
written by me some time ago: was it the release or alpha, was it br
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:01:11PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Aargh! NetworkSimplicity SSH rears its ugly head once again.
I'm seriously beginning to think that setup.exe should detect
a "NetworkSimplicity" installation and nuke it. Seriously.
Is anyone from NetworkSimplicity reading this mailin
> Same problem from the DOS prompt. Also, I saw the same thing with the most
> recent snapshot of cygwin1.dll (11/6). While playing around, I did notice
> that the characters I typed wound up being passed to the shell after I
> killed tf.
Does anyone still have snapshots of the cygwin dll from b
Florian Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to install cygwin on a friends machine.
> My problem is that when the installer creates the filesystem the "bin"
> directory is called "ssh". He also said that he tried to install a
> copy of ssh for windows before but removed it. Has annyone
Gary,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:32:49PM +, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I've had a look at the archives and found many references to rebase,
> but can't sus out exactly what I need to do - how to find out what
> params to pass to rebase etc.
>
> Anyone got a link to a good reference I could read?
Hello,
I am trying to install cygwin on a friends machine.
My problem is that when the installer creates the filesystem the "bin"
directory is called "ssh". He also said that he tried to install a copy
of ssh for windows before but removed it. Has annyone an idea how to
solve this problem?
tha
I did not see Chris Faylor messages before I sent my previous message
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-11/msg00784.html).
Quoting Chris:
> Don't want to play duelling patches, but did you build cygwin from the
> latest CVS? If so, you've pulled in my changes, too. It would be
> instructive to f
On Thursday 14 Nov 2002 5:10 pm, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Gary Stainburn wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > apache 1.3.224-5
> > mod_php 4.2.0-1
>
> the Win32 error 31 means: some device could bot be found in your
> system.
>
> Are you sure it's not the rebase issue?! Please check
> /usr/doc/Cygwin/php-4.2.0-1.READM
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:05:54PM +0100, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
>Compiled cygwin1.dll with this patch. I cannot test it completely because
>my Palm is at home. I ran with this cygwin1.dll and produced a strace
>on a W98SE machine at work.
>It looks promising. The timeout of 1000 is now there. I'l
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:19:59PM +0100, Joël GRONDIN wrote:
> Hello,
> does anybody know where are the man (or maybe info) pages for standard
> functions like open, opendir, pipe, socket, accept, etc. ?
>
> Are they missing ?
Yes. Use the man pages on http://www.opengroup.org/. We're trying
t
> > Did you compile it on your own from a official source tree or
> > recompiled the cygwin patched tree that is included in the distro?
> >
> The second.
so I guess there are some recent changes in the postgresql packages
that break my (old) php build?!
Anyway, I'm anyway preparing for a new rel
Hello,
does anybody know where are the man (or maybe info) pages for standard
functions like open, opendir, pipe, socket, accept, etc. ?
Are they missing ?
Thanks !
(galanga)
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Do
If s, than I will release a patched binutil > what means "recompiled" cygwin php
release?!
>
> Did you compile it on your own from a official source tree or
> recompiled the cygwin patched tree that is included in the distro?
>
The second.
Regards
Ralf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Sergei Okhapkin wrote:
> Could you compile cygwin1.dll with the following patch:
>
> diff -u -p -r1.35 fhandler_serial.cc
> --- fhandler_serial.cc 7 Nov 2002 18:47:21 - 1.35
> +++ fhandler_serial.cc 14 Nov 2002 22:37:58 -
> @@ -420,8 +420,8 @@ fhandler_serial::
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:44:41PM +0100, Johannes E. Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have NT4 with SP4 (as it is a Visual Workstation from SGI, I may not
> upgrade). Now, SSHD doesn't start as a service. Only if I let it start
> as Administrator, not as LocalSystem or another user.
>
> But if I st
Hi,
I have NT4 with SP4 (as it is a Visual Workstation from SGI, I may not
upgrade). Now, SSHD doesn't start as a service. Only if I let it start
as Administrator, not as LocalSystem or another user.
But if I start it as Administrator, sshd cannot cygwin_logon_user()!
I attached the /etc/group f
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:34:27PM +0100, Tino Lange wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since noone helps me I have to search for solutions myself:
>
> It seems that the sshd binds only to the local adress after the first login.
>
> When I start sshd for the first time it listens on all available
> interfaces, i
Thanks so much Chris! This seems to have done the trick.
I've been banging on /usr/bin/emacs in X11 with the 20021114 snapshot
and I have not been able to lock it up. I will keep trying (I've been
fooled before) but it looks rock solid.
Gratefully,
David
> Modified files:
> cygwin
Hi!
Since noone helps me I have to search for solutions myself:
It seems that the sshd binds only to the local adress after the first login.
When I start sshd for the first time it listens on all available
interfaces, i. e. loopback (localhost) and its IP Adress 192.168.1.4.
So I can connect fr
Ralf Habacker schrieb:
>
> > > before you are able to use php scripts which connect to a pgsql DB (of
> > > course phpPgAdmin will do so) it is necessary to configure this module with
> > > the appropriate flag (--with-pgsql) plus recompilation.
> >
> > this has been done for the php-4.2.0-1 relea
96 matches
Mail list logo
