Dave schrieb:
Here's a simple and useful patch for setup. Might reduce queries about
unattended installs, and save people having to resort to source.
Patch is against CVS (as of yesterday).
Modify the leader text as you see fit :)
Dave schrieb:
Here's a simple and useful patch for setup. Might reduce queries about
unattended installs, and save people having to resort to source.
Patch is against CVS (as of yesterday).
Modify the leader text as you see fit :)
Dave Kilroy.
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 12:28:27AM -0500, Robb, Sam wrote:
So it looks like the package files aren't being closed somewhere.
Taking a look at the source, and trying to figure out where something
like this might occur, I ended up in in install.cc, where I saw the
It appears, according to
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00287.html, that m4 has no
a maintainer. It was last uploaded 2 years ago, and 1.4.2 has since been
released with a security fix that I would like to see. So, I am offering to
become the maintainer.
I have plans to
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:47:20PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Are any of the setup.exe developers attempting to get to the bottom of
the problems that have been reported lately when installing X?
I see that Igor is attempting to help but it seems like we're seeing
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:12:47AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
It appears, according to
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00287.html, that m4 has
no a maintainer. It was last uploaded 2 years ago, and 1.4.2 has since
been released with a security fix that I would like to see.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 02:46:04PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:47:20PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Are any of the setup.exe developers attempting to get to the bottom of
the problems that have been reported lately when installing X?
I see
Christopher Faylor wrote:
...is it true?
Is very definitely true.
I've committed a fix, but as I began to test the new setup for release, I
discovered a regression since 2.427 (I finally reproduced the Unregistered
URL scheme), and a further crash in 2.427.
And now I'm stuck with a
Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
...is it true?
Is very definitely true.
I've committed a fix,
Ooops, no I haven't, it's still in my WC.
but as I began to test the new setup for release, I
discovered a regression since 2.427 (I finally reproduced the
Unregistered
URL scheme), and a
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
...is it true?
Is very definitely true.
I've committed a fix,
Ooops, no I haven't, it's still in my WC.
but as I began to test the new setup for release, I
discovered a regression since 2.427 (I finally reproduced the
Unregistered
(where I'm assuming that 'delete tmp' is the proper way to
deal with a
pointer returned by io_stream::open()...)
You cannot directly delete tmp. This is delegated to the
stream provider.
That's what I was afraid of. Leaving a returned pointer
hanging around is such an obvious problem, I
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:10:58AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
Dave schrieb:
Here's a simple and useful patch for setup. Might reduce queries about
unattended installs, and save people having to resort to source.
Patch is against CVS (as of yesterday).
Modify the leader
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
| I would like to contribute imlib to the Cygwin distribution. This
| package is in Fedora Core and Debian testing, so all it needs is a GTG
| review.
Ping?
Yaakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
| I would like to contribute gdk-pixbuf to the Cygwin distribution. As
| this is included in Fedora Core and Debian testing, all it needs is a
| GTG review.
Ping?
Yaakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4
cgf said:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 08:53:41PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:10:58AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
Actually, there was a thread about this on the cygwin list not too long
ago.
Yep. This suggested a complicated trick. I found an easier
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:27:20PM -0800, Dave wrote:
Hmmm. Just wonderring... Yep. OK. I see the output of stdout when
setup is run from bash. It doesn't appear if running from cmd. That
explains it.
You must be using CYGWIN=tty then, maybe? That would explain this.
Revised patch
Dave wrote:
Definitely go for a dialog box.
Revised patch attached. Should these be directed exclusively at bugzilla now?
I haven't tried your patch, but if you make a dialog how about one that
you can select and copy the text from, like a simple read-only richedit
control? I always hated
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Brian Dessent wrote:
Dave wrote:
Definitely go for a dialog box.
Revised patch attached. Should these be directed exclusively at
bugzilla now?
I haven't tried your patch, but if you make a dialog how about one that
you can select and copy the text from, like a
[snip]
I really don't understand why we should stand on our heads to
make setup.exe a console subsystem program (you don't need to
both specify -mwindows and -Wl,--subsystem=console, btw) when
you can just open up a dialog box to display the options,
like every other windows program in
Lester Ingber wrote:
Yes, XWin_GL seems to run OK, though I have not seen any dramatic
speedup yet.
glxgears shows the fps and has a dramatic speedup.
It is likely that part of this may be due to memory problems I seem to be
having in the latest xorg downloads, with XWin and now also with
The tree /etc/X11/xserver contains 720 symbolic links. The vast majority
of of them are locale specific and point to the directory
/etc/X11/xserver/C. The only thing in /etc/X11/xserver/C is a tree called
print.
The tree /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver seems to be identical to
/etc/X11/xserver.
Dick Repasky schrieb:
The tree /etc/X11/xserver contains 720 symbolic links. The vast majority
of of them are locale specific and point to the directory
/etc/X11/xserver/C. The only thing in /etc/X11/xserver/C is a tree called
print.
The tree /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver seems to be identical to
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
You got that wrong. the above cited msg is right.
I am very glad to have been wrong.
Thanks,
Dick
-
Dick Repasky
Bioinformatics Support
UITS Cubicle 101.08
Indiana University
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:26:05AM -0800, Lester Ingber wrote:
I was wrong in assuming this was a cygwin base problem. It must be a
cygwin-xfree problem. I have no problems I can see in a cygwin console
window, only in an xterm (or rxvt) window running under
XWin -unixkill -emulate3buttons
Luke Kendall wrote:
On 16 Nov, Bobby McNulty wrote:
Then I'm not the only one noticing this?
No, myself and one other person here have begun noticing it.
luke
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Alexander:
I believe the problem to be with the new xorg files, but there are quite
a few and I don't have time to reinstall them all. I assume I'll just
wait until the next update, but I hope the maintainers will at least
keep this potential problem in mind.
I have this CPU problem under xterm
I just saw Christopher's posting re my posting of 12 Nov, explaining
that indeed this is a Cygwin-specific problem.
Lester
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Alexander:
I believe the problem to be with the new xorg files, but there are quite
a few and I don't have
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:14:37AM -0800, Lester Ingber wrote:
I believe the problem to be with the new xorg files, but there are quite
a few and I don't have time to reinstall them all. I assume I'll just
wait until the next update, but I hope the maintainers will at least
keep this potential
Lester,
Exactly what kind of speedups are you expecting here? AFAIU, the
GLX-accelerated XWin will give you speedup only for programs that use the
GLX extension, which automatically excludes most standard X clients (e.g.,
xterm, emacs, etc). For applications not using the GLX extension, the
Hi all,
Searched the mailing list for this FAQ but no joy, so here we go
How can I reconnect to a Cygwin/X server created X session started on a
Linux server (Debian Sarge) ?
How I currently connect ?
From my XP desktop, open Cygwin Bash Shell
Type X -broadcast
Get the KDM log in screen from
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: noreparent
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 00:48:42
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : cygthread.cc dcrt0.cc debug.cc exceptions.cc
fhandler_tty.cc fork.cc pinfo.cc pinfo.h
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: noreparent
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 02:55:44
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : cygthread.h pinfo.cc
Log message:
race
Patches:
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 05:20:23
Modified files:
winsup/utils : ChangeLog cygcheck.cc
Log message:
* cygcheck.cc (eprintf): New function.
Patches:
Hi,all
I'm a newbie to cygwin/linux/unix. Can somebody tell me what's the
difference between the directories /bin, /usr/bin, and /usr/local/bin ?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
Theo Verelst schrieb:
I've started a sound generator package on Linux and Cygwin consisting
of a sound server program based on Portaudio library connected with
a Tcl/Tk script with user interface, in this case starting with
a 8 harmonics sliders like in an organ.
See:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:27:47PM +0800, ZF Tang wrote:
Hi,all
I'm a newbie to cygwin/linux/unix. Can somebody tell me what's the
difference between the directories /bin, /usr/bin, and /usr/local/bin ?
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html
--
Reini Urban wrote:
Theo Verelst schrieb:
I've started a sound generator package on Linux and Cygwin consisting
...
http://82.168.209.239/Soundtest
Why not use the standard puredata, which is also based on tcl/tk and
portaudio, but is stable and mature?
Well, as quick response, to begin with I
Theo Verelst schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Theo Verelst schrieb:
I've started a sound generator package on Linux and Cygwin consisting
...
http://82.168.209.239/Soundtest
Why not use the standard puredata, which is also based on tcl/tk and
portaudio, but is stable and mature?
Well, as quick
Thanks for your reply.
We have now modified the registry with the keys, as described by Gerrit, to
increase the heap size. The result is the same.
I can give some more details that we have encountered. It is possible to run
the program in gdb, but only if we compile and link with oraSQL10.lib:
From the Recovering from Windows penchant for spaces in user and file
names Department:
Maybe I'm being really dense, but the --from switch isn't quite
working as advertised:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test
$ ls -ln
-rwxrwxrwx1 544 51348 Nov 17 03:59 testfile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
I tried to install clapack on cygwin and errors occurred. I would very much
appreciate your help.
In particular:
I downloaded clapack.tgz from http://www.netlib.org/clapack/, unpacked it
with WinRAR and followed steps 1-5 of the clapack readme.install
successfully. I used the
Luke Kendall wrote:
I should also add that after a setup.exe crash at 9:38am after being
left running overnight, later attempts to install that day (with the VM
size steadily increasing, and setup.exe appearing to stick at the
stage where it is installing the zip package), that setup.log was not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Nov, Bobby McNulty wrote:
Guys, theres a major problem with setup.
According to the error I just got, setup is not
closing any of its files after writing them.
I finally got past xorg, and got up to update_info.
I'll rerun setup to get a cygcheck.
I can confirm
when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3.
when I try clicking New to get 3.4.1, gcc-core keeps jumping to
Keep.
when will 3.4 become the default version?
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
http://www.camera.org http://www.iris.org.il http://www.memri.org/
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:27:47PM +0800, ZF Tang wrote:
Hi,all
I'm a newbie to cygwin/linux/unix. Can somebody tell me what's the
difference between the directories /bin, /usr/bin, and /usr/local/bin ?
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:25:30AM -0800, George wrote:
From the Recovering from Windows penchant for spaces in user and file
names Department:
Maybe I'm being really dense, but the --from switch isn't quite
working as advertised:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test
$ ls -ln
-rwxrwxrwx1 544 513
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:58:47AM -0500, Sam Steingold wrote:
when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3.
when I try clicking New to get 3.4.1, gcc-core keeps jumping to
Keep.
when will 3.4 become the default version?
Sometime within the next year.
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Sam Steingold wrote:
when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3.
when I try clicking New to get 3.4.1, gcc-core keeps jumping to
Keep.
Umm, first off, where did you find New in setup? Secondly, gcc-3.4.1 is
an experimental package, so you should select the Exp
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, George wrote:
From the Recovering from Windows penchant for spaces in user and file
names Department:
Maybe I'm being really dense, but the --from switch isn't quite
working as advertised:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test
$ ls -ln
-rwxrwxrwx1 544 51348
* Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-11-17 10:23:49 -0500]:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Sam Steingold wrote:
when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3.
when I try clicking New to get 3.4.1, gcc-core keeps jumping to
Keep.
Umm, first off, where did you find New in setup?
select
Hi,
I've installed Bash on several Win2k workstations. Most are
working fine, but one particular machine is giving trouble.
I am attempting to install only the base package - no compilers,
editors, X11 or anything else. The setup program appears to run
correctly. After the installation
Hello,
I've got a problem with a shell script used with Cygwin 1.5.10-3 on
W2000 SP4 and W XP SP 2.
The following part of code works on all the Unix I've tested
(HP-UX/AIX/Sun Solaris/Linux).
With Cygwin, it doesn't :(
*Code:*
cmd=long shell command with differents parameters
if [ ! eval $cmd
* Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-11-17 10:24:21 -0500]:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:58:47AM -0500, Sam Steingold wrote:
when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3.
when I try clicking New to get 3.4.1, gcc-core keeps jumping to
Keep.
when will 3.4 become the default version?
Luke Kendall wrote:
On 17 Nov, To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The system starts page faulting and the number of
handles just grows and grows, and eventually setup dies
I can add this:
At the crash point, setup.exe has some 600 open handles and 2 Gb of VM.
It's
accumulated 2.5 million page faults.
Eleftheria Kavoussanaki writes:
Hello!
I tried to install clapack on cygwin and errors occurred. I would very much
appreciate your help.
/.../
How can I make the process of timing the clapack routines run in a
reasonably finite amount of time?
Not sure about clapack, but I have
Geoffrey KRETZ schrieb:
I've got a problem with a shell script used with Cygwin 1.5.10-3 on
W2000 SP4 and W XP SP 2.
The following part of code works on all the Unix I've tested
(HP-UX/AIX/Sun Solaris/Linux).
With Cygwin, it doesn't :(
*Code:*
cmd=long shell command with differents parameters
Sam Steingold schrieb:
* Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-11-17 10:23:49 -0500]:
Secondly, gcc-3.4.1 is an experimental package, so you should select
the Exp radio button on the Select Packages screen to get it.
WFM.
when will 3.4 become the default version?
Sorry, can't answer that.
who
* Reini Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-11-17 17:19:33 +0100]:
Sam Steingold schrieb:
* Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-11-17 10:23:49 -0500]:
when will 3.4 become the default version?
Sorry, can't answer that.
who can?
gerrit (the maintainer) can.
Gerrit, could you please speak up?
Hello
Next year (using the current version of cygwin which I can not remember), I
managed to load from java (JNI) a dll (build against cygwin1.dll) compiled with
gcc under cygwin.
Now , I have updated my cygwin (1.5.9 for me tooday), and it does not work any
more.
I saw on the cygwin mailing
When I try to install cygwin on windows xp, the installer hangs at around
90%, when it's running the X post install scripts. (From a full install)
My logs are at:
It seems to be related to:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com/msg12903.html
--
Unsubscribe info:
Crap crap crap crap.
My apologies, I *started* writing this email, then found a solution to the
problem, then went back in to _delete_ this message, and sent it instead.
Sheesh :)
Kristopher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Kris Matthews wrote:
When I try to install cygwin on windows
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:26:05AM -0800, Lester Ingber wrote:
I was wrong in assuming this was a cygwin base problem. It must be a
cygwin-xfree problem. I have no problems I can see in a cygwin console
window, only in an xterm (or rxvt) window running under
XWin -unixkill -emulate3buttons
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: 16 November 2004 17:39
Hi folks,
after upgrading to latest cygwin1.dll and openssh I have
massive problems with ssh/scp. Using e.g. the same scp
command it fails from time to time called from the command
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:18 PM:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: 16 November 2004 17:39
Sure. How about 200k of unintelligible gibberish? I'm
sure we'd all _love_ to see it.
At least it contained more useful
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible
Sent: 17 November 2004 17:22
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:18 PM:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: 16 November 2004 17:39
Sure. How about 200k of unintelligible
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
Geoffrey KRETZ schrieb:
I've got a problem with a shell script used with Cygwin 1.5.10-3 on W2000
SP4 and W XP SP 2.
The following part of code works on all the Unix I've tested (HP-UX/AIX/Sun
Solaris/Linux).
With Cygwin, it doesn't :(
Reini Urban wrote:
Geoffrey KRETZ schrieb:
I've got a problem with a shell script used with Cygwin 1.5.10-3 on
W2000 SP4 and W XP SP 2.
The following part of code works on all the Unix I've tested
(HP-UX/AIX/Sun Solaris/Linux).
With Cygwin, it doesn't :(
*Code:*
cmd=long shell command with
Luke Kendall wrote:
On 16 Nov, Bobby McNulty wrote:
Then I'm not the only one noticing this?
No, myself and one other person here have begun noticing it.
luke
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Max Bowsher wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Nov, Bobby McNulty wrote:
Guys, theres a major problem with setup.
According to the error I just got, setup is not
closing any of its files after writing them.
I finally got past xorg, and got up to update_info.
I'll rerun setup to get a
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:24 PM:
I beg to differ.
My post contained the useful information that dumping a
couple of hundred Kb of unsolicited strace output on the list
is a pointless waste of time.
Yours contained a couple of hundred Kb of unsolicited strace
Geoffrey KRETZ schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC43
cygwin's /bin/sh is ash, on most other platforms it is /bin/bash.
If you want it to behave it exactly like on other platforms, and you use
bash specific constructs, use the /bin/bash shebang.
If I specified #!
Actually my original unix script use :
if ! $cmd; then
...
fi
AND
if ! eval $cmd; then
...
fi
And it works perfectly
I'm forced to use eval because I'm of the structure of my $cmd variable.
Just a few samples :
- cmd=$LDPRELOAD $FGLRUN ${mainname}.42r -db $dbname -dt $dbtype -ho
$QAHOST
Jörg Schaible schrieb:
I know, that there were massive changes handling fork() and the
pipes. So what shall I do, if a the problem now only manifests
regularly if scp is called by Java calling a dos batch calling a
shell script ? Using strace the problem is going to happen much more
unlikely. So
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: 17 November 2004 17:41
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:24 PM:
*Mine* contained more useful info and was a fraction of the size.
Well, nonetheless, none of your comments really help with the
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:20:56PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
or if you like living on the edge there's a new experimental noparent
branch for cygwin1.dll
Sigh. Do not use this branch. It is not intended for anyone but me.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
YorkshireSkier BLOB aol.com wrote:
...
However, if I try to use a command that uses the here document,
I see the following error:
$ cat fred
1
2
3
fred
bash: cannot create temp file for here document: No such file or
directory
I can confirm that the variables TEMP and TMP (and
Hi Kris,
I have the same problem of installing full cygwin 1.5.12.1. It froze
at 93% when installing postinstall in X11 directory. The disk size
continued growing. It was 2G when I eventally decided to delete it.
Then my computer crashed.
It seems to me that you found a solution. Could you
What worked for me:
1. Completely wipe out existing cygwin installation
2. Install all of cygwin *except* X.
3. .. Install X stuff, by itself.
Regards,
Kristopher
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jing Zhou wrote:
Hi Kris,
I have the same problem of installing full cygwin 1.5.12.1. It froze
at 93% when
Kris Matthews wrote:
What worked for me:
1. Completely wipe out existing cygwin installation
2. Install all of cygwin *except* X.
3. .. Install X stuff, by itself.
Regards,
Kristopher
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jing Zhou wrote:
Hi Kris,
I have the same problem of installing full cygwin 1.5.12.1. It
On 17 Nov, Max Bowsher wrote:
Luke Kendall wrote:
I should also add that after a setup.exe crash at 9:38am after being
left running overnight, later attempts to install that day (with the VM
size steadily increasing, and setup.exe appearing to stick at the
stage where it is installing
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:09:26AM +1100, Luke Kendall wrote:
Sorry to be causing you such hassles. I'm hoping to get a chance to
try the latest Cygwin:
You can try the latest cygwin. Just install everything in two or
three steps.
This is not the final solution, of course, but this problem
Luke Kendall wrote:
I can confirm this. We took a snapshot of October 26th
(setup-timestamp: 1098732614), and in that version of setup,
That number you quoted identifies the version of the setup.ini datafile, not
the setup.exe program.
Sorry, how's this?
$ bunzip2 -c setup.bz2 |
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:09:26AM +1100, Luke Kendall wrote:
Sorry to be causing you such hassles. I'm hoping to get a chance to
try the latest Cygwin:
You can try the latest cygwin. Just install everything in two or
three steps.
This is not the final solution,
m4 has been updated to version 1.4.2
NEWS
This release patches a security hole in m4 1.4: the maketemp macro now
creates the temporary file, rather than just returning an unused filename.
Additionally, the documentation has been moved to the /usr/share/info directory.
DESCRIPTION
I tried using a perl-tk script in cygwin that I wrote more than
a year ago. Whenever I run it it dies at:
Can't locate Tk.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5...
I did a search and couldn't find Tk.pm. So I looked to the cygwin
website, but didn't find any mention of it there, either.
dwycoff wrote:
I tried using a perl-tk script in cygwin that I wrote more than
a year ago. Whenever I run it it dies at:
Can't locate Tk.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5...
I did a search and couldn't find Tk.pm. So I looked to the cygwin
website, but didn't find any
Reini Urban wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 7:21 PM:
Hi Jörg :)
So, if you can't or won't help, I prefer no answer.
Downgrading to cygwin-1.3.11 should help.
Hmmm. My old cygwin.dll was not *that* old. 1.5.9 or so (unfortunately I
deleted my download cache to be sure to gain the
m4 has been updated to version 1.4.2
NEWS
This release patches a security hole in m4 1.4: the maketemp macro now
creates the temporary file, rather than just returning an unused filename.
Additionally, the documentation has been moved to the /usr/share/info directory.
DESCRIPTION
88 matches
Mail list logo
