-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to add cvsutils to my growing list of maintained packages.
Debian lists it as stable, packages.debian.org/stable/devel/cvsutils.
sdesc: CVS client utilities for offline work.
ldesc: Client-side tools for interacting with CVS, performing
Different versions of Unison won't talk to each other. For example, if
I have version 2.10.2 (current beta) installed on my local Cygwin host,
I can't synchronize with a server that's running version 2.9.1 (current
stable). The version numbers have to be exactly the same, or Unison
will issue an
Hi,
I am interested in becoming a package maintainer for the package
epstool. The
current version of upstream is located at
ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ghost/ghostgum/epstool-3.06.tar.gz
epstool is GPL'ed, and is available in Debian.
I have source and binary packages available, but
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:20:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have source and binary packages available, but am unable to test
setup.hint due to the non-availability of upset.
The format of setup.ini is easy enough to understand. You don't need a
special program to test this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different versions of Unison won't talk to each other. For example, if
I have version 2.10.2 (current beta) installed on my local Cygwin host,
I can't synchronize with a server that's running version 2.9.1 (current
stable). The version numbers have to be exactly the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested in becoming a package maintainer for the package
epstool.
You may be interested to take a look at the version taht was packaged by
Charles Wilson:
http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/testing/ADOPT-ME/epstool/
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The format of setup.ini is easy enough to understand. You don't need a
special program to test this.
OK, you have to use unix style path separators - I figured that out, so
setup.ini parses successfully.
I got the file sizes and the md5's
Help!,
I am trying to use cygwin/X to connect to a fedora 3 redhat machine using the
command
X -query machine_name
I get the following errors
_XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root
winValidateArgs - g_iNumScreens: 1 iMaxConsecutiveScreen: 1
(II) XF86Config is not
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Rumble, Phil wrote:
Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from
li
st!
winPointerWarpCursor - Discarding first warp: 509 345
XDM: too many retransmissions, declaring session dead
Check the FAQ. Most likely xdm is configured to ignore
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
A twit hit a free software mailing list.
On censoring fortune he did insist.
``Can't have limericks about pussies and dicks!''
A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
I don't think this is a limerick, though, which rather
spoils the joke.
A limerick has 5 lines with a
Hi,
When telnet to Cygwin server, it displayed
CYGWIN_NT-5.0 version(0.51/3/2)
login:
Can I change the above login message ? How ?
Thanks
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:37:57AM +, Cliff Hones wrote:
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
A twit hit a free software mailing list.
On censoring fortune he did insist.
``Can't have limericks about *** and *!''
A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
I don't think this is a limerick,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:43:55PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:47:35PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:40:16PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:26:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu,
In the current build, manpage displays are successful, but are accompanied
by several error messages; viz.,
Unrecognized line in config file (ignored)
JNROFF LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 /usr/bin/groff -Tnippon -mandocj
Unrecognized line in config file (ignored)
KNROFF /usr/bin/groff
THUFIR HAWAT wrote:
$ smake
bash: smake: command not found
make all and make install suceeded, so why isn't smake a command now?
tried deleting the INSTALL file, but had the same results.
Schily Software is installed into /opt/schily by default.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Cliff Hones wrote:
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
A twit hit a free software mailing list.
On censoring fortune he did insist.
``Can't have limericks about pussies and dicks!''
A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
I don't think this is a limerick, though, which rather
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gene C. Ruzicka
Sent: 07 January 2005 10:08
In the current build, manpage displays are successful, but
are accompanied
by several error messages; viz.,
Unrecognized line in config file (ignored)
JNROFF LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8
- Original Message -
From: Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[..]
Schily Software is installed into /opt/schily by default.
[..]
sorry, not sure I follow you there. what or where is /opt/schily, please?
thanks,
Thufir
--
___
THUFIR HAWAT wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[..]
Schily Software is installed into /opt/schily by default.
[..]
sorry, not sure I follow you there. what or where is /opt/schily, please?
This is a directory. Try `ls /opt` and see if there is a
Same programme compiled under Cygwin writes output which differs form its
LINUX-compiled version
I apologise in advance if the question is too trivial but I am a simple user
and not a programmer.
I have written a small FORTRAN programme (see attachment) which reads and
writes numbers in a
file:
On Jan 6 20:03, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Ah jeez deFaria:
As an atheist I always wonder why christians can turn the
other cheek
but cannot seem to muster how to turn their eyes away!
As a thinking man, I always wonder why atheists:
1. Hate Christianity, yet harbor no such hatred
On Jan 6 21:18, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune files?
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[ ] Don't care. Can we go back to
The political correctness brainwashing machine has done its job
quite well, AFAICS.
Well, let's face it, I'm a woman. I'm by definition one of the
disadvantaged groups of the society. The joke is this, I'm not
at all offended by offensive jokes. I don't have to laugh if I
don't like the joke,
On Jan 6 14:10, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it normal that during an SSH connection EFS-encrypted files are not
accessible?
Is it for the way the SSH token autentication is made?
I'm sorry, Lapo, but I have no idea what you're taking about.
-v
Argh please enough with the pedantic and infantile America/American
bashing. It's disgusting. Everyone act like mature adults PLEASE!
Zach
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:29:03 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6 21:18, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
How do
On Jan 7 17:17, bella wrote:
Hi,
When telnet to Cygwin server, it displayed
CYGWIN_NT-5.0 version(0.51/3/2)
login:
Can I change the above login message ? How ?
Not that I'm aware of.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
NB: Did anybody read Fahrenheit 451 from Ray Bradbury?
It's not about
jokes in the first place, but somehow this discussion reminds me
of the book in a fatal way.
Me too, it also reminds me of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron.
Bill
--
___
oo //
Brian Bruns wrote:
As grown adults, who are capable of making our own decisions, we need
to not let our religious views, or personal views for that matter,
impede on others who have their own views.
How dare you try to force that point of view on us!
That's moral recusrion.
--
Unsubscribe
On Jan 7 01:28, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Right now I'm looking at the debian packages instead:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortune-mod
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortunes-bofh-excuses
which generate 5 packages: fortune-mod (the binaries),
On Jan 7 06:35, Zachary Uram wrote:
Argh please enough with the pedantic and infantile America/American
bashing. It's disgusting. Everyone act like mature adults PLEASE!
The whole discussion isn't exactly mature. Time to move the discussion
to cygwin-talk, I guess. I've set the Reply-To
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/smake/
I *think* it's the same. the context is star and cdrTools.
with regards to directories, ls / gives:
bin cygwin.bat cygwin.ico etc home lib tmp usr var
should I get packages from cygwin.com ?
--
Thufir
--
Henry,
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:02:20PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
Jason Tishler writes:
If you get any errors due to DLLs being in-use or read-only,
then take the appropriate action and rerun rebaseall.
Otherwise, you run the risk of fork() failing.
Is it normal that during an SSH connection EFS-encrypted
files are not
accessible?
Is it for the way the SSH token autentication is made?
Yes, it probably is.
I belive the user's private EFS is encrypted using their password hash. If
the SSH token was generated without using a password
THUFIR HAWAT wrote:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/smake/
I *think* it's the same. the context is star and cdrTools.
with regards to directories, ls / gives:
bin cygwin.bat cygwin.ico etc home lib tmp usr var
should I get packages from cygwin.com ?
No. Just try to figure out what the smake Makefile is
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
Sent: 07 January 2005 11:44
To: cygwin; cygwin-talk
Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
On Jan 7 06:35, Zachary Uram wrote:
Argh please enough with the pedantic and infantile America/American
bashing.
Hi all,
A question, I had a look at the implementation of pthread_key_create. When
an invalid key is passed, a EBUSY is returned. This looks very strange to
me, isn't it better to return EINVAL just as the pthread_key_delete does?
Also, shouldn't be the check be
if
Hi all:
I want to know how to compile a program in cygwin using gcc.
Here is my instance:
1I install cygwin in c:/cygwin
2I wrote a piece of code named test.c in E:/prog/test/test.c.
AND suppose the program just printf hello.
How can i
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[ ] Don't care. Can we go back to talking about how
negative this list is now?
[x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional
in the extreme and can only result
I searched both the cygwin packages and gnu site for fuser but didn't
find it. Did I miss it or is it not there? If not are there any plans to
port fuser to cygwin?
TIA
--
Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:04:49PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote:
Expletive deleted.
Well, thanks! That is in perfect keeping with the rest of this thread.
Just imagine the consequences if you hadn't deleted that expletive. We'd
have another long thread about whether the cygwin mailing list should
Hello,
I'm trying to install Cygwin on my Windows 2000 computer, but I have a
problem (Can't open database for writing etc.).
I had a look in the archive and saw that the problem has been discussed
several times. The message that appears to be most relevant to my
situation appears to be Larry
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:22:32AM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
Personally, I thought that them doing this was a sign of a more
innocent time, where we didn't have to worry about every single
word that came out of our mouth (or keyboard).
Seriously guy, your type is one of the primary reasons
Hi,
The cygwin mailing list search engine (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/) seems
to be on the fritz this morning. Thought you'd want to know if you didn't
know already, and I figured that the mailing address listed on the
Internal Error page (sourceware.org) wouldn't get results.
The error
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:25:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
NB: Did anybody read Fahrenheit 451 from Ray Bradbury? It's not about
jokes in the first place, but somehow this discussion reminds me
of the book in a fatal way.
I read the book but I don't remember it too well. I've
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Yeah, it does. For the first time in history, there are now two
lawyers for every human on the planet. Lawyers subsist almost entirely
on a diet of lawsuits.
Funny, I thought they ate food like the rest of us...
Actually, when you think about it, it's impossible for that
Kal Dee schrieb:
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks (/usr/share/fortune/limerick)
are meant to be in the cygwin distro...
phpwiki optionally uses fortune to fill in fresh pages with some stupid
quotes. nobody ever so far complained about those limericks.
phpwiki pages are publicly
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 7 01:28, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Right now I'm looking at the debian packages instead:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortune-mod
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortunes-bofh-excuses
THUFIR HAWAT schrieb:
as per C:\cygwin\home\Administrator\smake-1.2\COMPILE
Please ask further questions about a program not supported by cygwin at
the right place.
Jörg Schilling suggests using [EMAIL PROTECTED] therefore.
$ pwd
/home/Administrator/smake-1.2
$ make all
NOTICE: Using bootstrap
I have an incident from the early 90s that is very close to this
discussion:
I worked at a division headquarters of large company, where we had
hundreds of people who would log into their email account on the VAX.
When logging in you would see a message of the day. The guy
administering this got
William R. Knox wrote:
...
If you don't like the fortunes, don't install them.
Unfortunately, that argument (or admonition) doesn't quite hold water:
* It requires recognizing that the fortune package is part of what
you're installing. That doesn't happen if you select to install
all of
Terry Dabbs wrote:
I worked at a division headquarters of large company, where we had
hundreds of people who would log into their email account on the VAX.
When logging in you would see a message of the day. The guy
administering this got tired of the same old boring messages and
started
We would like to port our BSD licensed Open Source
software from straight Windows to the
CyCygwinnvironment, such that we are no longer using
the Microsoft compiler tools and instead using the
gcgccnd the CyCygwinibraries.
Would this contaminate our project with the GPGPLWe
would like to continue
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Good thing I didn't install it at work, and that I don't work at a Megacorp
that has whole departments devoted to rooting through peoples' files looking
for reasons to fire them.
IMHO, this is the single best reason for obfuscating the profanity with
rot13.
--
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:39:40AM -0800, Rob Rhoads wrote:
We would like to port our BSD licensed Open Source software from
straight Windows to the CyCygwinnvironment, such that we are no longer
using the Microsoft compiler tools and instead using the gcgccnd the
CyCygwinibraries.
Would this
Hi-
I recently installed cygwin and have been testing various facets of it,
namely the tasks that I usually perform on my sun workstation. All seems
to work fine except I am having trouble with the fortran compiler.
In short, a program that works fine on my workstation gives different
output on
Expletive deleted.
Well, thanks! That is in perfect keeping with the rest of this thread.
Just imagine the consequences if you hadn't deleted that expletive. We'd
have another long thread about whether the cygwin mailing list should be
censored.
And then, of course, there's the children.
;-)
Herbert Eppel wrote:
I removed the burnatonce software and tried to reinstall Cygwin, but
after 90% I get the same problem, i.e. I first get a warning message
(see http://homepage.ntlworld.com/herb.eppel_new/temp/CygwinWarn1.jpg),
This is no prblem and no error, just follow the hint displayed.
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 7 01:28, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Right now I'm looking at the debian packages instead:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortune-mod
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortunes-bofh-excuses
which generate 5
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Raye Raskin
Sent: 07 January 2005 17:23
Hey, Christopher, if you want to see something *really* offensive,
just take a look at this:
**
This e-mail
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: 07 January 2005 14:52
Business issues are not the point here, though. My issue is that I
grant others the right to be offended by the type of language we're
talking about. It is a given that there are many
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dick Henry
Sent: 07 January 2005 17:16
In short, a program that works fine on my workstation gives different
output on my laptop using the f77 compiler from cygwin.
I have no idea what's going on.
Nor does anyone else. Gives
On 07.01.2005 17:55 UK Time, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Herbert Eppel wrote:
I removed the burnatonce software and tried to reinstall Cygwin, but
after 90% I get the same problem, i.e. I first get a warning message
(see http://homepage.ntlworld.com/herb.eppel_new/temp/CygwinWarn1.jpg),
This is no
At 02:42 AM 1/7/2005, you wrote:
Hi all:
I want to know how to compile a program in cygwin using gcc.
Here is my instance:
1I install cygwin in c:/cygwin
2I wrote a piece of code named test.c in E:/prog/test/test.c.
AND suppose the program just printf
At 09:34 AM 1/7/2005, you wrote:
I searched both the cygwin packages and gnu site for fuser but didn't find it.
Did I miss it or is it not there? If not are there any plans to port fuser to
cygwin?
No, it is not part of any current package, as a check of
http://cygwin.com/packages/ shows. As
Hey... well I don't get the error message you're getting, but when my
installation hits 90% the progress bar goes right to the end then it stops and
just keeps using more memory until it uses it all then crashes.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
Jason Tishler writes:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:02:20PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
Jason Tishler writes:
If you get any errors due to DLLs being in-use or read-only,
then take the appropriate action and rerun rebaseall.
Otherwise, you run the risk of fork() failing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
But of course then I'm stuck with other code that won't run because of
the two-different-bases problem.
Anyway, thanks _very_ much for your help, it sounds like the xemacs
folks are really where this needs to be solved. Point is, this is a
I'm porting I program I wrote under Linux to Windows using cygwin. It
compiled without a single change, but when run, libglade's
glade_xml_signal_autoconnect function did not find the signal handler
functions, and issues errors like this:
libglade-WARNING **: could not find signal handler
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005, Peter A. Castro might have said:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 7 01:28, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Right now I'm looking at the debian packages instead:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortune-mod
I'm looking for a way to do the following:
- When installing cygwin - tell it a list of packages to install
(perhaps from commandline or a script). Is this possible - without
going through the list in the setup.exe GUI?
- If cygwin is already installed - run some comand line tool/script -
which
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
I'm porting I program I wrote under Linux to Windows using cygwin. It
compiled without a single change, but when run, libglade's
glade_xml_signal_autoconnect function did not find the signal handler
functions, and issues errors like this:
libglade-WARNING **: could
since e-mails to joerg
http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/joerg.schilling/private/index.html
just get bounced, I put the question to the cdrecord-support list, but it
seems very low volume.
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/cdrecord-support/2005-January/thread.html.
--
Thufir
Cliff Hones wrote:
De dah dah de dah dah de dah
Sounds like the world's filthiest limerick, which is apparently so
potent that the bowdlerized version (further bowdlerized for spam
filters :-) looks like
De dah dah de dah dah de dah
De dah dah de dah dah de dah
De dah dah dah dah
De dah dah
OK, anybody still reading this thread probably already knows how to
do this, but just in case, here's what you need to do to clean up
your fortune files (other than just deleting them):
First, make sure you have the tools you need and double-check that
the offensive files are in plaintext:
$ ls
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
gtk_widget_hide_on_delete is exported explicitly (at least in version
2.4.14 whioch is the latest available).
That's the version I use (2.4.14-1, actually). All other packages are
most likely in their latest versions, because I installed cygwin
Dick Henry wrote:
In short, a program that works fine on my workstation gives different
output on my laptop using the f77 compiler from cygwin.
Are you creating binary files? Just a wild guess (based on recently
porting a Sun Fortran to cygwin), but then I'd assume
you are running into big
At the beginning of this week I reported that libxsl2-python and libxslt
need to be updated to use python2.4/site-packages/. I have since
determined that this also is an upstream problem: the configure.in
scripts in Gnome CVS name python{2.3,2.2,...} but not python2.4. I have
filed bug reports
Mike wrote:
Since you must *ask* for the 'rude' version of fortune (fortune -o)
before you get any of the alleged offensive material, then what's the
problem?
@ fortune
sdesc: Print a random, hopefully interesting, adage
category: Games
requires: cygwin
The problem is that it doesn't inform the
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005, Jon A. Lambert might have said:
Mike wrote:
Since you must *ask* for the 'rude' version of fortune (fortune -o)
before you get any of the alleged offensive material, then what's the
problem?
@ fortune
sdesc: Print a random, hopefully interesting, adage
category:
Mike wrote:
I would have been better informed about the nature of the package.
How eloquent.
Try 'man fortune'.
man fortune doesn't work until after you've already downloaded and installed
the offensive material on your machine.
--
Unsubscribe info:
Jon A. Lambert wrote:
Mike wrote:
I would have been better informed about the nature of the package.
How eloquent.
Try 'man fortune'.
man fortune doesn't work until after you've already downloaded and
installed the offensive material on your machine.
Yes but it *can* work just after you install
Yes but it *can* work just after you install it but before
you ever run
it! This part seems like a disclaimer if I've ever saw one:
-oChoose only from potentially offensive aphorisms. Please,
please,
please request a potentially offensive fortune if
and only if
I'm seeing some wierd behavior - I'd like to downgrade to
cygwin-1.5.10-3 - and see if this goes away.
The cygwin setup gives the option of downgrading to cygwin-1.5.11-1 -
but not cygwin-1.5.10-3. (I'm currently using the latest 1.5.12-1)
How can I downgrade to cygwin-1.5.10-3? (I have the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 7 17:17, bella wrote:
Hi,
When telnet to Cygwin server, it displayed
CYGWIN_NT-5.0 version(0.51/3/2)
login:
Can I change the above login message ? How ?
Not that I'm aware of.
Meaning that the line is compiled in. You can
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:25:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
NB: Did anybody read Fahrenheit 451 from Ray Bradbury? It's not about
jokes in the first place, but somehow this discussion reminds me
of the book in a fatal way.
I read
Hello!
I've been trying to build the SRecord package version 1.20:
http://srecord.sourceforge.net/
I'm using the Cygwin GCC compiler, 3.3.3. I've been getting failures
during the link phase:
g++ -o bin/srec_cat prog/srec_cat/arglex3.o prog/srec_cat/main.o
lib/libsrecord.a
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Satish Balay wrote:
I'm seeing some wierd behavior - I'd like to downgrade to
cygwin-1.5.10-3 - and see if this goes away.
The cygwin setup gives the option of downgrading to cygwin-1.5.11-1 -
but not cygwin-1.5.10-3. (I'm currently using the latest 1.5.12-1)
How
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Daniel B. wrote:
Hey, too bad there's not a universal offensiveness rating system
(multidimensional, maybe like the geek code?)
LOL. You mean, the eek code? :-)
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_
At 05:48 PM 1/7/2005, you wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Satish Balay wrote:
I'm seeing some wierd behavior - I'd like to downgrade to
cygwin-1.5.10-3 - and see if this goes away.
The cygwin setup gives the option of downgrading to cygwin-1.5.11-1 -
but not cygwin-1.5.10-3. (I'm currently
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
If you can find a stale mirror that contains cygwin-1.5.10-3, then you
may find that you get the above message if you install it.
Isn't that the challange? :). The few mirrors I tried are up2date..
You'll get such a message for any packages you have
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Satish Balay wrote:
I'm able to use 'tar' method to downgrade to 1.5.10-3 - and try a few
things out. But I can't make it permanant - as 'cygcheck -c cygwin'
gives 1.5.11 - and this breaks some other tools.
ok - I just had to edit /etc/setup/installed.db - and change
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Good thing I didn't install it at work, and that I don't work at a
Megacorp that has whole departments devoted to rooting through
peoples' files looking for reasons to fire them.
IMHO, this is the single best reason for obfuscating the
profanity with
The David Korn who is not the Korn Shell guy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: 07 January 2005 14:52
Business issues are not the point here, though. My issue is that I
grant others the right to be offended by the type of
Jerry Williams, not of the band Grateful Dead, wrote:
== fortunes2-o ==
Would you please have another look at my nose and put in that
cocaine stuff
-- Adolf Hitler, quoted by Dr. Giesing in
Nuremberg trial
Is something like this even legal in Germany?
--
Gary R.
Most agree that it's a packaging bug in fortune, and that the
limericks file should be renamed limericks-o and ROT13'd.
End of discussion.
Nononono, don't you try to force your end-of-discussion values on ME!
I agree that at a minimum, the obfuscation you describe is absolutely
required.
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005, Jon A. Lambert might have said:
Mike wrote:
Since you must *ask* for the 'rude' version of fortune
(fortune -o)
before you get any of the alleged offensive material, then
what's the
problem?
@ fortune
sdesc: Print a random, hopefully interesting,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Perhaps. Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for providing the
profanity at all?
A number of people like them.
Best,
Rodrigo
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
- Original Message -
From: Rodrigo de Salvo Braz
To: Gary R. Van Sickle
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 6:04 PM
Subject: RE: Obscene content in cygwin file.
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Perhaps. Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Perhaps. Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for
providing
the profanity at all?
A number of people like them.
Best,
Rodrigo
A number of people like hard pore cornography too. Cygwin doesn't provide
that, at least not in
- Original Message -
From: Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 6:18 PM
Subject: RE: Obscene content in cygwin file.
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Perhaps. Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for
providing
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
