Re: Relocation patch for cygwin

2011-09-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 9/24/2011 7:01 AM, jojelino wrote: On 2011-09-24 PM 12:16, Christopher Faylor wrote: Flat profile: Please don't send this type of stuff here. You've just spammed hundreds of people with many kilobytes data that very few people care about. cgf I'm sorry about hundreds of spam mail. i keep

Re: Relocation patch for cygwin

2011-09-23 Thread jojelino
On 2011-09-24 PM 12:16, Christopher Faylor wrote: Flat profile: Please don't send this type of stuff here. You've just spammed hundreds of people with many kilobytes data that very few people care about. cgf I'm sorry about hundreds of spam mail. i keep myself from spamming by giving extern

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: experimental octave-3.4.2-3

2011-09-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
New experimental versions 3.4.2-3 of octave, octave-devel, octave-doc are available in the Cygwin distribution. It replace 3.4.2-2 that has a packing error. CYGWIN CHANGES This is a cygwin bug fix release of 3.4.2-1 https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31641 With a work around at the previou

Re: Relocation patch for cygwin

2011-09-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 05:10:00AM +0900, jojelino wrote: >On 2011-01-29 AM 3:04, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On the cygwin list, Corinna Vinschen, one of the main cygwin developers >> and project lead, noticed a problem with libiconv's behavior on cygwin >> 1.7.x (which I'll follow up on the appropri

Re: Relocation patch for cygwin

2011-09-23 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 23/09/2011 4:10 PM, jojelino wrote: On 2011-01-29 AM 3:04, Charles Wilson wrote: On the cygwin list, Corinna Vinschen, one of the main cygwin developers and project lead, noticed a problem with libiconv's behavior on cygwin 1.7.x (which I'll follow up on the appropriate list, in a few days).

gcc4: libstdc++6-4.5.3-2 is probably not backwards compatible

2011-09-23 Thread Christian Franke
ddrescue segfaults in option parsing after gcc was updated from 4.3.4-4 to 4.5.3-2. (ddrescue package was build with g++ 4.3.4-3) I tracked down the problem to a segfault in vector< string > destructor, see attached testcase. 1. Compile and run with g++ 4.3.4, use -O2 to enable inline expans

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 9/23/2011 12:07 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: On 9/23/2011 11:26 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: I'm talking about developers of applications, not cygwin-using end users. The developers could work around it (by not including .exe bootstrap files in cr

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Steve Atkins
On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > On 9/23/2011 11:26 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: >> I'm talking about developers of applications, not cygwin-using end users. >> The developers could work around it (by not including .exe bootstrap files >> in cross-platform packages or being care

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 9/23/2011 11:26 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: I'm talking about developers of applications, not cygwin-using end users. The developers could work around it (by not including .exe bootstrap files in cross-platform packages or being careful with naming), but they don't because it's not an issue tha

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Steve Atkins
On Sep 23, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > On 9/23/2011 9:14 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> >>> On 09/23/11 07:55, Ryan Johnson wrote: Wild speculation here... A quick test shows that ./a indeed works fine inside cygwin

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 9/23/2011 9:14 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: On 09/23/11 07:55, Ryan Johnson wrote: Wild speculation here... A quick test shows that ./a indeed works fine inside cygwin whether the '.exe' is present or not, though it would be a little challengi

Re: AW: [bulk] - [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {serf,libserf1_0,libserf1-devel}-1.0.0-1

2011-09-23 Thread David Rothenberger
On 9/23/2011 1:15 AM, DEWI - N. Zacharias wrote: > >> Von: David Rothenberger >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2011 19:47 >> Betreff: [bulk] - [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {serf,libserf1_0,libserf1- >> devel}-1.0.0-1 >> >> The serf packages have been updated to the new upstream release >> 1.0.0.

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Steve Atkins
On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > On 09/23/11 07:55, Ryan Johnson wrote: >> >> Wild speculation here... >> >> A quick test shows that ./a indeed works fine inside cygwin whether the >> '.exe' is present or not, though it would be a little challenging invoke >> such binaries

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Peter Rosin
Andrew DeFaria wrote On 2011-09-23 17:34: On 09/23/11 07:55, Ryan Johnson wrote: *** The old, removed "transparent_exe" has the wrong boolean sense to work the correct way by default What do you do about say, Foo.c and foo.c? How about looking in the faq? http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 09/23/11 07:55, Ryan Johnson wrote: On 22/09/2011 9:56 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 9/22/2011 4:57 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: In the process of trying to build Qt on Windows in a cygwin shell, I've discovered that neither tar nor unzip will work reliably under Cygwin - untaring an archive

Re: tar deletes .exe files on extraction (again)

2011-09-23 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 22/09/2011 9:56 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 9/22/2011 4:57 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: In the process of trying to build Qt on Windows in a cygwin shell, I've discovered that neither tar nor unzip will work reliably under Cygwin - untaring an archive will not correctly create the files that

AW: [bulk] - [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {serf,libserf1_0,libserf1-devel}-1.0.0-1

2011-09-23 Thread DEWI - N. Zacharias
Hi all, > Von: David Rothenberger > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2011 19:47 > Betreff: [bulk] - [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {serf,libserf1_0,libserf1- > devel}-1.0.0-1 > > The serf packages have been updated to the new upstream release > 1.0.0. See > > http://code.google.com/p/serf/source/b