Please have a look at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.devel/976
for the discussions. The inline versions lack memory clobber and
could cause problems as Danny showed.
Best regards
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports
THANKS. Your message solved my problem.
I used to set CYGWIN=nontsec in my .bashrc. Now I set it in cygwin.bat,
and all works well.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Max Bowsher ---
New behaviour: when an executable is wanted, the system will check by
file permissions
possible help/suggestions.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
, system support for file permissions
makes cygwin ignore ntsec/nontsec setting when autocompleting. That is,
the old behaviour only occurs on FAT disks.
I think the old way is more consistent.
Hope I am clearer.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Christopher Faylor ---
I
= 0x3F8 : starting service `cron' failed:
execv: 0, No error.) but the process cron appeared.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
P.S. When starting cron from a command prompt or shell, the process
will be bound to the command prompt or shell, i.e., when the command
prompt or shell exits
Thanks. However, where can I find the options of cron? Now I only find
some info in /usr/doc/Cygwin/cron.README, but only in the ChangeLog
section, which I ignored on the first reading!
And what is the use of the option -a?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Elfyn McBratney
not work. I must manually chmod -x test.c to make the
it work as I desired. I suppose the 1.3.12-4 behaviour is more
desirable, because it is easier to use, esp. when one does not want
ntsec. Is it possible to revert to the original behaviour?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info
to do
that. Once our mail server is blocked by a open relay list, but it is
easier to remedy and I feel good that a security hole in our mail server
is eliminated.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http
because of this. -- But I realize that I am not much better in that I
want to cure them instead of being cured And this is going
off-topic.
I stop now.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Christopher Faylor ---
Is SPEWS necessary? I see that the whole DSL IP range of our
Hi,
What's the status of this patch?
--
ChangeLog:
2002-10-28 Wu Yongwei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ip.h (struct ip): Use u_char to indicate bitfields to make it
work with -fnative-struct/-fms-bitfields.
(struct ip_timestamp): Ditto.
* tcp.h (struct tcphdr): Ditto
regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Christopher Faylor ---
Danny's suggestion is correct. The rest of the header files which
accomodate this are probably using __attribute__((packed)) . The
argument that the header works ok for you on MSVC is a non-issue for cygwin.
cgf
Oops, what kind of problem can occur? I did not think of that. But I
suppose u_char is symmetric with other definitions, and it always works
for me under GCC or MSVC (while __attribute__((packed)) works only for GCC).
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Danny Smith ---
--- Wu
be no problem.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
ChangeLog:
2002-10-28 Wu Yongwei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ip.h (struct ip): Use u_char to indicate bitfields to make it
work with -fnative-struct/-fms-bitfields.
(struct ip_timestamp): Ditto.
* tcp.h (struct tcphdr): Ditto.
diff -u -r
it is an unwelcome bad idea but the new setup really frets me. I would
love to do the above myself if I were able to do it in an hour. But it seems
I am really not familar enough with the GNU configuration and Cygwin code
itself.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
Maybe a foolish question, but I did not find it. A CVS tree is appreciated.
Thanks.
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http
that no big changes will make 2.125.2.10 obsolete.
I really like that version.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http
current mailer does not support inserting TABs.:-(
Maybe I need to use others when submitting a patch.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
software developed by the University of
California, Berkeley and its contributors.
4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
without specific prior written permission.
Best regards,
Wu
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:00:58AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
Thank you for all the responses, even the one telling me not to SHOUT. A
message is better than nothing, and I shouted because it seemed no one
noticed my message.
But I am not here to argue. I ask. Should I
software developed by the University of
California, Berkeley and its contributors.
4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
without specific prior written permission.
Best regards,
Wu
the licence issue. And
I asked first.
Maybe I should state again that using the BSD files I successfully built my
Linux project on Windows. It uses BSD-style TCP and UDP struct definition.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting
cannot find xxx.h or so.
2. They harms. I have put new ip.h and tcp.h under /usr/include/netinet to
ease compilation of *NIX code. But they will be overwritten sometimes by
updating my Cygwin installation.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
- Original Message -
From: Wu Yongwei [EMAIL PROTECTED
I noticed that these two header files in /usr/include/netinet is really
missing. I have been using the ones from FreeBSD and that fit very well. I
just need to add the following lines to the beginning of ip.h:
/* Added by Wu Yongwei */
#ifndef LITTLE_ENDIAN
#define LITTLE_ENDIAN 1234
#define
of interest, who reviews and tests the code?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Christopher Faylor ---
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:41:11PM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
Glibc is at least an important implementation. Don't we need compatibility?
No. Why are you asking this question
, use the facilities described in
21.4.8 Functions and Variables for Time Zones.
I do not understand you quite clearly. And I want to emphasize again that IT
USED TO WORK! Do I need to write patches so that the code is unpatched?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Christopher
Also notes the usage of unspecified. Unspecified means the standard does
not say anything about the implementation, and, IMHO, the implementors are
free to choose the best practices. I think it is obviously a good way to
follow BSD.
Am I wrong?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message
Cygwin only better
(unless someone thinks better compatibility is a sin).
Hope I am clear enough. I am arguing here for a BETTER Cygwin.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Karsten Fleischer ---
Thank you for your suggestions. The points are:
1) Cygwin did very well
expressed my meanings.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Randall R Schulz ---
Yongwei,
At 18:45 2002-03-25, you wrote:
...
Hope I am clear enough. I am arguing here for a BETTER Cygwin.
No. You're asking to be let off the hook for either writing intrinsically
portable code
indicates that calling tzset is costly. I am not sure of the case
with Cygwin. However, it is just there for you to review.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Christopher Faylor ---
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:45:32AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
Hope I am clear enough. I am arguing
to go? Or should I abandon
running international time-related program on Cygwin in a cross-platform
way?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Christopher Faylor ---
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 06:24:00PM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
More tests show that gettimeofday has problems
), and all is OK. But other parts of
Cygwin seems to require a newer version. I do hope a fix very soon.
Oh yes, I am running Chinese Windows 2000. I wish it was not a
platform-specific problem.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting
More tests show that gettimeofday has problems with timezones, too! Just
terrible.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ
Directory while they are not downloaded at all (when I
chose to download only some of the new packages)! And it even uninstalled
the old packages without installing anything if I just click Next and so on.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
cygsetup1.png
Description: PNG image
cygsetup2.png
,
close took 0.43 second.
Another problem concerns signal handling. This program could be stopped by
CTRL-C under MinGW and Linux, but it hung and used 100% of CPU under Cygwin
when CTRL-C was hit.
Any help?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
P.S. On a last test, one strange thing happened. If I reload
Yes. But it did not help much. And in later testing I found even the first
time the sshd service was started after reboot it still had problems: it
would accept ONLY the first login, and later attempts would be denied.
Thank you for your kind and quick help, after all.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
. And some of these problems might
platform-specific. And maybe I did not do something that you think even
idiot will do
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Corinna Vinschen ---
Did you check your passwd and group files, did you check the
ownership of the host key files
Terribly sorry for my own mistake. I did not try
export CYGWIN=ntsec
chown SYSTEM ssh_host_*
Never thought it would have any difference. I was really not used to using
Unix commands in a Windows environment and had not found how to change
ownership to SYSTEM by Windows Explorer.
Shy.
Wu
to switch back to the old behaviour?
Thank you in advance. Reply to this mail address, please.
Best regards
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ
on setup by default.
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--- Original Message from Robert Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
In the past, Cygwin seemed to judge whether a file is executable on a
combination of suffix and content. However, today when I reinstalled
Cygwin,
I suddenly found that it no more did
]:/home/cvs and I can execute a cvs login using
pserver. However, when I try cvs import..., it always reports
setuid failed: Not owner
Any ideas? (I can log in to FTP as Administrator or anonymous and
encounter no problems.)
Thanks and best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http
denied.
Any help? (Reply to me, please.)
Thanks and best regards,
Wu Yongwei
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
41 matches
Mail list logo
