On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:37PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:22:49PM -0800, neoclassical wrote:
>>
>>
>>Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> Bye, bye Mr. Anonymous Coward.
>>>
>>
>>Abusing your authority by re-classifying my email address as "spam"
>>does not win
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:22:49PM -0800, neoclassical wrote:
>
>
>Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
>>
>> Bye, bye Mr. Anonymous Coward.
>>
>
>Abusing your authority by re-classifying my email address as "spam"
>does not win an argument. In fact, it speaks poorly of your character.
And I should care
Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
>
> Bye, bye Mr. Anonymous Coward.
>
Abusing your authority by re-classifying my email address as "spam" does not
win an argument. In fact, it speaks poorly of your character.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:13:21PM -0800, infoterror wrote:
>Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
>>Since you haven't been able to come up with any cygwin-specific
>>information (or any information really), I'm declaring this topic over.
>>If you want to continue in this vein, use cygwin-talk. This is your
ur pretentious high
horse?
FYI
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7124766
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygw
perhaps, if packages are listed in an updated, there
can be some explanation visible of what they are, possibly even a column in
the interface:
package-name (other config data) Libraries for input/output and
intoxication.
?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygin
someone dare
suggest your project could use some additions. This is all-too typical in
IT. Good luck in your quest for maturity and logical coherence.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7124473
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing li
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:36:26PM -0800, infoterror wrote:
>Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
>>My second paragraph was stating that I didn't understand how you could
>>come to the conclusion that only schools are keeping cygwin alive since
>>there are clearly many messages from companies on this mailin
On Oct 31 17:36, infoterror wrote:
> [...]
Oh boy, stop it. It's a nice try of trolling but eventually it's
getting tiresome.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe
y assume the "the problem is between the screen and the chair."
I am a professional, and a logician, and if I seem terse, it's that I don't
take kindly to having my time wasted by people who do not understand logical
argument and are not emotionally stable enough to accept logic.
Best,
--
[overly long reply]
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:58:59PM -0800, infoterror wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 06:41:51PM -0700, infoterror wrote:
>gdiviney wrote:
>>A one-hour compiler class assignment has become an all-day goose-hunt.
>>Thanks Cygwin developers! Maybe someday I???ll have
he
critic" rhetoric. How... immature.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7065394
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem repor
f 10-06)
Mike Marchywka
586 Saint James Walk
Marietta GA 30067-7165r
( NOTE MORE NEWER NUMBER )
404-788-1216 (C)<- leave message
989-348-4796 (P)<- emergency only
From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Cygintl-3
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 06:41:51PM -0700, infoterror wrote:
>gdiviney wrote:
>>A one-hour compiler class assignment has become an all-day goose-hunt.
>>Thanks Cygwin developers! Maybe someday I???ll have the opportunity to
>>waste an entire day of your lives. If it weren???t for schools, your
>>ab
t unrealistic responses I've seen from open sourcers, I probably
would be one.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7042419
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://c
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
h
gdiviney wrote:
I'm not going to get into a discussion about my assumptions or yours. You
have no idea who I am, what I have done or not done to solve this problem,
or even if I have solved this problem. You have no idea what forums I have
been in, how often I encounter or use Cygwin, or what my
rch for Cygintl-3.dll,
> that also tells us a little bit about you and, what it tells us, is not
> all that impressive.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:51:23PM -0700, gdiviney wrote:
>Yep, I agree whole-heartedly. I ran across this thread because (guess what?)
>the install package did not deliver this file (and I can only guess which
>others). I???ve reviewed the thread and, as you note, you were attacked for
>pointing o
rk. This is
> the mark of a "thin intelligence," or someone who can handle pre-defined
> tasks but is incapable of critical thinking.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7022170
Sent from the Cygwin Users mail
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
>My intention is to develop an alternative to Cygwin Setup. That means
>it must support all dependencies, setup.ini and package repositories
>around.
>
>I've thought that we can have a monolithic installer which installs a
>basic en
ust 11, 2006 5:00 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll
was not found]
On 11 August 2006 15:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
It's also worth noting that the goal here was a subset of Cygwin
functionality packaged as a monolithic (no matter how
lithic installers.
Any comments ?
Rgrds Tev
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Korn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:00 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll
> was not found]
>
> On 11 August 2006 15
On 11 August 2006 15:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> It's also worth noting that the goal here was a subset of Cygwin
> functionality packaged as a monolithic (no matter how small) install.
> While the former is a potential supplement to "setup.exe", the latter is a
> step backward in terms of
Dave Korn wrote:
On 11 August 2006 07:36, Reini Urban wrote:
Tevfik Karagülle schrieb:
After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and
their dependencies. 54 of 797 packages are qualified for Base either
directly or indirectly:
...
I will develop an NSIS package which crea
On 11 August 2006 07:36, Reini Urban wrote:
> Tevfik Karagülle schrieb:
>> After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and
>> their dependencies. 54 of 797 packages are qualified for Base either
>> directly or indirectly:
> ...
>> I will develop an NSIS package which creates reg
Tevfik Karagülle schrieb:
After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and
their dependencies. 54 of 797 packages are qualified for Base either
directly or indirectly:
...
I will develop an NSIS package which creates registry
Mount points, untar packages above and run the
Post
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:59:18PM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
> I don't know how to switch from digest mode to normal mode.
>That's why I think this mail is a little bit out-of-sync. Sorry about that.
>
>After feedback from cgf, I have scanned setup.ini for packages and
>their dependencies. 54
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a5753884
Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: h
do you think are being caused by installing to
>"c:\cygwin" and/or what kind of problems would be solved by installing
>to "c:\Program Files\cygwin"?
Please see above.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a575385
cript. Any suggestions including naming
are welcome.
Rgrds Tev
> -Original Message-
> From: Tevfik Karagülle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:43 PM
> To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'; 'Dave Korn'
> Subject: RE: Setup.exe require
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:43:01PM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
>Thanks.
>
>According to the setup.exe default package information,
>Following 41 packages forms 'a core cygwin environment':
>
>---
>Alternatives ash base-files base-passwd bash coreutils
>cygwin cygwin-do
introduce upgrade functionality.
Rgrds Tev
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Peshansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:17 PM
> To: Dave Korn
> Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll
> was not found]
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 10 August 2006 14:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
> >> cgf wrote:
> >>> Standards such as? A pointer to a free installer which uses Windows
> >>> standards and which will handle Cygwin
On 10 August 2006 14:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
>> cgf wrote:
>>> Standards such as? A pointer to a free installer which uses Windows
>>> standards and which will handle Cygwin's needs would be useful, e.g.,
>>> would NSIS mee
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
>cgf wrote:
>>Standards such as? A pointer to a free installer which uses Windows
>>standards and which will handle Cygwin's needs would be useful, e.g.,
>>would NSIS meet your needs? We've discussed using NSIS in the past.
>
>Can
>
> Standards such as? A pointer to a free installer which uses
> Windows standards and which will handle Cygwin's needs would
> be useful, e.g., would NSIS meet your needs? We've discussed
> using NSIS in the past.
>
Can anyone give me a qualified reference about the requirements
of a co
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:38:47PM -0700, infoterror wrote:
>Remember, I predicted the "thin intelligences" would lash out at those from
>outside their tribe who dare comment on their work.
It really isn't that hard to predict what kind of response you'll get.
When one uses confrontational languag
> Have you tried this with the recently announced setup.exe snapshot?
If it was announced after the first reply I made to this list, no.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a5733352
Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.
1. You're running cygwin on a Windows system. Local standards, not POSIX,
need apply.
2. Works fine for VMware :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a5733347
Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe in
On 08/09/2006, infoterror wrote:
Under windows XP, download setup.exe. Run it and select "download files for
installation." Save these files to CD-R and carry to remote location. When
you install cygwin, and attempt to run bash, it will come up with the
cygintl-3.dll error.
Have you tried thi
infoterror wrote:
Under windows, programs are installed by default in "C:\Program Files."
cygwin's preferred "c:\cygwin" is foolish and makes an unnecessary mess of
installations.
Cygwin's "c:\cygwin" contains AN ENTIRE (virtual) FILESYSTEM. I don't
know about you, but *I* sure don't want that
cygwin" is foolish and makes an unnecessary mess of
installations.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a5732487
Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-
On 09 August 2006 02:44, infoterror wrote:
This thread was over a month ago and the guy went away happy with a solution
to his problems. What exactly do you have to add to it?
> Based on two installs I did, it's easy to get the "cygintl-3.dll problem"
> without doing anything wrong. Sometimes
Standard response of the underconfident: accuse legitimate critics of being
illegitimate sources, e.g. trolls.
"Don't listen to the witch!"
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a5719366
Sent from the Cygwin Users foru
gt;> > computer. However, when I try to install Cygwin in my Windows XP Home
>> > Edition notebook, I see a message that says Cygintl-3.dll was not
>> > found and bash.exe crashes. How to solve this problem?
>>
>> That means that you deselected a required package
> Edition notebook, I see a message that says Cygintl-3.dll was not
> > found and bash.exe crashes. How to solve this problem?
>
> That means that you deselected a required package in setup. Rerun
> setup, let it choose any missing dependencies, and make sure libintl3 is
> sele
Roberto Sapiens wrote:
> I have dowloaded Cygwin from cygwin.com web site. From that download,
> I have installed Cygwin with no problems in a Windows 2000 Pro
> computer. However, when I try to install Cygwin in my Windows XP Home
> Edition notebook, I see a message that says Cygin
Hello, all:
I have dowloaded Cygwin from cygwin.com web site. From that download,
I have installed Cygwin with no problems in a Windows 2000 Pro
computer. However, when I try to install Cygwin in my Windows XP Home
Edition notebook, I see a message that says Cygintl-3.dll was not
found and
49 matches
Mail list logo
