Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-07-04 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:28:08PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And of course the discussion and methodology behind the internal development of the cygwin libraries, issues, and future ideas is - in true opensource form (NOT) - on a completely closed list, invite-only, with no public access

Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-07-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:10:47PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:28:08PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And of course the discussion and methodology behind the internal development of the cygwin libraries, issues, and future ideas is - in true opensource form

Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-07-01 Thread Joe Smith
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:48:14AM +0100, Darryl Miles wrote: Is my more technical discussion better put onto the cygwin-patches list ? No. The mailing list descriptions really are accurate. If you don't have a

Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-07-01 Thread clayne
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:42:00PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in No. The mailing list descriptions really are accurate. If you don't have a patch, then you shouldn't be sending email to cygwin-patches. Most cygwin development discussion occurs

Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-07-01 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/1/2006 2:28 PM: And of course the discussion and methodology behind the internal development of the cygwin libraries, issues, and future ideas is - in true opensource form (NOT) - on a completely closed list,

Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-07-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:42:00PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:48:14AM +0100, Darryl Miles wrote: Is my more technical discussion better put onto the cygwin-patches list ? No. The mailing list

Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-06-29 Thread Darryl Miles
There is this list, which seems general purpose. Enough said. There is cygwin-patches, which claims to be for patch submissions but looking at the recent history is actually an open developers list. There is cygwin-developers, which is a closed list. Is my more technical discussion better

Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?

2006-06-29 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:48:14AM +0100, Darryl Miles wrote: Is my more technical discussion better put onto the cygwin-patches list ? No. The mailing list descriptions really are accurate. If you don't have a patch, then you shouldn't be sending email to cygwin-patches. cgf -- Unsubscribe