Signed scripts and packages [Was: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.5-2]

2002-11-09 Thread Lapo Luchini
1. I had to put some variables in quotes, otherwise you get problems with "if [ ... ]" when the variable is not set. E.g without SIG=1 Ok. 2. text=... is set, but never used. text is used in sigfile() to print which file must be signed: echo "$text signature need to be updated"; \

Re: [Fwd: ezmlm response]

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 15:47, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 03:20:57PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >I got this when I committed the recent setup web page update.. > > Should be fixed now. Thanks, I'll let you know when next I update the web pages ;}. Rob -- --- GPG key

Re: [Fwd: ezmlm response]

2002-11-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 03:20:57PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >I got this when I committed the recent setup web page update.. Should be fixed now. cgf

[Fwd: ezmlm response]

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Collins
I got this when I committed the recent setup web page update.. Rob -Forwarded Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ezmlm response > Date: 10 Nov 2002 03:59:42 + > > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. >

setup.exe-HEAD should build from CVS on gcc-3.

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Collins
Ok, I've applied most of Max's patches. CVS setup now builds and runs for me with gcc-3. Max, I've not applied a couple of the patches: -Wno-deprecated is not needed. proppage.h I've not gotten to (yet). I don't think I've missed any other patches, can you diff your sandbox against my commits to

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-09 Thread Charles Wilson
Also, the cygutils package already includes /usr/bin/last.exe but I'm not sure what to do about this since I bet Chuck took it from some sysvinit package and wouldn't mind moving it to its canonical location once the sysvinit package gets together. Mark Bradshaw originally sent me the patch to a

Re: Recent CVS commits

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 12:08, Max Bowsher wrote: > Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh, and I've not updated the client code to use the new > > LogFile::createLogFile factory yet. That should be a one liner (for a > > heap allocated object) or two liner (for a member object) update.

Re: Recent CVS commits

2002-11-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, and I've not updated the client code to use the new > LogFile::createLogFile factory yet. That should be a one liner (for a > heap allocated object) or two liner (for a member object) update. I've never really programmed any complicated inheritance,

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.5-2

2002-11-09 Thread Volker Quetschke
Hi, Lapo Luchini wrote: 3 build script updated to support digital signatures 4 source package now contains original's package detached gpg signature by the author and detached signatures on the script itself and on the patch, signed by me 5 signatures can be checked with "./rsync-2.5.5-2.sh c

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Earnie Boyd
Robert Collins wrote: On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 11:05, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: I think a postinstall script that: * sets reasonable defaults * obeys and doesn't overwrite user defined settings should be ok. The postinstall script could always query the user. Earnie.

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 11:05, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: > > What if I want to install init just to look at the included readmes? Install the source package. > Or if I > > want to install it as a service with slightly different settings? This one is important. > Or > simply > > dislike my computer

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
Done. http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/ Sergey Okhapkin Somerset, NJ - Original Message - From: "Sergey Okhapkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 7:05 PM Subject: Re: init and agetty packages

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
> What if I want to install init just to look at the included readmes? Or if I > want to install it as a service with slightly different settings? Or simply > dislike my computer doing too much without telling me about it? > OK, I give up:-) I will remove postinstall script and provide installatio

Re: [list] Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
> Huh, what about typing init on the command line to switch > runlevels? bash-2.05b$ oldps af PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 844 0 S0:00 bash 2080 0 R0:00 \_ oldps af bash-2.05b$ ./chkconfig --list xinetd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on4:on5:on6:off xinetd based ser

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Sergey Okhapkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Sshd can run as stand-alone service or from inetd. Init supposed to >>> run as a service only. I don't expect somebody need to run init >>> from something other than cygrunsrv:-) >> >> Well, yes, but just because someone downloads init (for example, t

RE: [list] Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Chris January
> > I'm too lazy to send 2 URLs:-) > > I suppose because of the overwealmingly positive response we > can make an exception... > > > > > While I really like the idea of having an init running, I don't > > > > think that simply selecting the package should make it install as a > > > > service with t

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
> > > > Sshd can run as stand-alone service or from inetd. Init supposed to run as a > > service only. I don't expect somebody need to run init from something other > > than cygrunsrv:-) > > Well, yes, but just because someone downloads init (for example, to > run agetty) doesn't mean they want it

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-09 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: > I'm too lazy to send 2 URLs:-) I suppose because of the overwealmingly positive response we can make an exception... > > > While I really like the idea of having an init running, I don't > > > think that simply selecting the package should make it ins

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-09 Thread Earnie Boyd
IIRC, the old style symlink wouldn't work with a .exe extention. Earnie. Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 07:31:53PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: What are the symlink problems? Do you mean a symlink points to the executable name without .exe suffix? Yes. But I was confuse

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-09 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
I fixed the symlinks in the updated sysvinit package. The symlinks now point to the executable with .exe suffix: lrwxrwxrwx Admin/Admin0 2002-11-09 08:21:22 sbin/telinit -> init.exe Sergey Okhapkin Somerset, NJ - Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 07:31:53PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: >What are the symlink problems? Do you mean a symlink points to the >executable name without .exe suffix? Yes. But I was confused. I didn't remember (or maybe didn't know) that a symlink didn't have to contain a .exe when it was li

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-09 Thread Jason Tishler
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:28:08AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > "Sergey Okhapkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm going to maintain the cygwin ports of init and agetty packages. > > You can get the source code and binary packages at > > http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/. agetty allow

Re: Recent CVS commits

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 01:25, Robert Collins wrote: > I'm about to commit an alpha sstream update to LogSingleton/LogFile. I'm > gambling that libg++-3.2 has fixed some of the apparent bugs that > impacted me before. Oh, and I've not updated the client code to use the new LogFile::createLogFile f

Re: Recent CVS commits

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 00:45, Max Bowsher wrote: > I observe a steady stream of CVS commits of my patches! > > Thanks Robert! > Heh, we are getting there. I'm about to commit an alpha sstream update to LogSingleton/LogFile. I'm gambling that libg++-3.2 has fixed some of the apparent bugs that im

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-09 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
Agetty and init packages are updated on http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/ according to your feedback: agetty: added "login" to required packages list added explanation of cygwin-Windows serial port names mapping to agetty.README init: fixed symlinks problem in the binary package

Recent CVS commits

2002-11-09 Thread Max Bowsher
I observe a steady stream of CVS commits of my patches! Thanks Robert!

Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
"Sergey Okhapkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm going to maintain the cygwin ports of init and agetty packages. You can > get the source code and binary packages at > http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/. agetty allows to login into Windows > NT box via a serial cable connected to a com por