Reini Urban wrote:
Reini Urban schrieb:
Dr. Volker Zell schrieb:
Christopher Faylor writes:
> I don't see it anywhere. The closest thing I see is:
> libopenldap2_2_7/libopenldap2_2_7-2.2.17-1.tar.bz2
That's ok. I don't know what Reini is seeing.
Unfortunately I didn't make a screenshot and
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:03 +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> Brian Dessent schrieb:
> > Reini Urban wrote:
> >>Esp. "Replaces: sh-utils fileutils textutils" would be needed for
> >>coreutils. And it doesn't require additional user-input.
> >
> > It's not strictly necessary. There's already the _ZZZRem
There are command line options to avoid this; see
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00526.html
-n --no-shortcuts Disable creation of desktop and start
-N --no-startmenu Disable creation of start menu shortcut
-d --no-desktop Disable creation of desktop shortcut
A
Hi Yaakov,
> These are the same as before; maybe you missed my earlier messages. I
> repackaged 6 libraries for you (libbonobo2, GConf2, gnome-vfs2,
> libgnome2, libbonoboui2, libgnomeui2); you can download them at:
You wrote in the setup.hint (e.g. libbonobo2):
category: GNOME
Do we have this
I wonder if most of people have any knoweladge about setup command line
arguments, I believe in most cases setup is being started directly from
cygwin web page.
It's the most important rule of any GUI program design - all settings
must be available in GUI.
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 08:07, Buchbinder
I find myself wishing for a bug tracker for setup.
Is there any likelyhood of sources.redhat.com provided bug-trackers in the
future?
For now, I'm contemplating throwing a quick install of Bugzilla (or other
software - suggestions very welcome in *private* mail) onto the student
webserver at my
At Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:34 AM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> I wonder if most of people have any knowledge about setup command
> line arguments, I believe in most cases setup is being started
> directly from cygwin web page.
>
> It's the most important rule of any GUI program design - all set
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) schrieb:
At Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:34 AM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
I wonder if most of people have any knowledge about setup command
line arguments, I believe in most cases setup is being started
directly from cygwin web page.
It's the most important rule of any
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Can someone please upload
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.80-1-src.tar.bz2
I guess I don't need another bump for this.
The patch had additional, non-existing files from a broken mkpatch,
which I removed.
This would overwr
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
> I find myself wishing for a bug tracker for setup.
>
> Is there any likelyhood of sources.redhat.com provided bug-trackers in the
> future?
>
> For now, I'm contemplating throwing a quick install of Bugzilla (or other
> software - suggestions very welcome
Brian Ford schrieb:
Did you see:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-10/msg00194.html
? Reini and I offered to co-maintain it if CGF decides to follow through.
Sounds like you have another point in favor?
Just "setup" has to be added as cygwin component
at http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/
In the m
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:42:11AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
>
>> I find myself wishing for a bug tracker for setup.
>>
>> Is there any likelyhood of sources.redhat.com provided bug-trackers in the
>> future?
>>
>> For now, I'm contemplating throwing a quick
Reini Urban wrote:
Just "setup" has to be added as cygwin component
at http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/
Excellent! And someone already seems to have done that.
I will start using it.
People should feel free to file setup bugs themselves but *please* try to
keep entries in the bugzilla to concis
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
> Reini Urban schrieb:
> > Dr. Volker Zell schrieb:
> > > > > > > > Christopher Faylor writes:
> > > > I don't see it anywhere. The closest thing I see is:
> > > > libopenldap2_2_7/libopenldap2_2_7-2.2.17-1.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > That's ok. I don't kno
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
Reini Urban schrieb:
Dr. Volker Zell schrieb:
Christopher Faylor writes:
> I don't see it anywhere. The closest thing I see is:
> libopenldap2_2_7/libopenldap2_2_7-2.2.17-1.tar.bz2
That's ok. I don't know what Reini is seeing
Igor Pechtchanski schrieb:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
Reini Urban schrieb:
Dr. Volker Zell schrieb:
Christopher Faylor writes:
> I don't see it anywhere. The closest thing I see is:
> libopenldap2_2_7/libopenldap2_2_7-2.2.17-1.tar.bz2
That's ok. I don't know what Reini is seein
Reini Urban wrote:
Using gettext would be fine but we must link everything statically, and
I doubt that is worth the effort to put the mo's into the exe as some
data ressource, dump it at start to some dirs and use it then. Can
gettext() use internals ressources? Can it use some kind of
MapViewOfFi
On 2004-10-27T12:08-0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=cygwin
)
) You can go to http://cygwin.com/bugzilla/ and get an account. setup.exe
) is a separate category, as is cygwin/x.
Can we use this to submit new packages, updates, etc. as
Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2004-10-27T12:08-0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=cygwin
)
) You can go to http://cygwin.com/bugzilla/ and get an account. setup.exe
) is a separate category, as is cygwin/x.
Can we use this to submit new packages
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Using gettext would be fine but we must link everything statically, and
I doubt that is worth the effort to put the mo's into the exe as some
data ressource, dump it at start to some dirs and use it then. Can
gettext() use internals ressources? Can it use som
Reini Urban wrote:
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Using gettext would be fine but we must link everything statically, and
I doubt that is worth the effort to put the mo's into the exe as some
data ressource, dump it at start to some dirs and use it then. Can
gettext() use internals ressour
I hate to cross post like this, but I think it's appropriate for the
question posed...
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've set up the categories for cygwin:
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=cygwin
Should the "Default Owner" be changed for Cygwin
On 2004-10-27T19:19+0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) > Can we use this to submit new packages, updates, etc. as RFEs against
) > either
) > a "distribution" component or the existing "Cygwin Applications"
) > component?
) Bugzilla's value is the structured persistence of information
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Can someone please upload
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.80-1-src.tar.bz2
I guess I don't need another bump for this.
The patch had additional, non-existing files from a broken mkpatch,
which I removed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| You wrote in the setup.hint (e.g. libbonobo2):
| category: GNOME
|
| Do we have this category now? Christopher?
I've been using the GNOME category internally, and I guess I copied that
into your tarball by mistake.
But I really
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Using gettext would be fine but we must link everything statically, and
I doubt that is worth the effort to put the mo's into the exe as some
data ressource, dump it at start to some dirs and use it then. Can
gettext()
Reini Urban wrote:
But I want first only think about ... mingw-bzip2 integration
I've done some work on this, but currently given up for the moment, contact
me for a status update before speding time on this one.
Max.
On 2004-10-27T14:10-0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
) (The mock-ups I made for a custom package-management site were originally
) modelled after Bugzilla.)
The mock up is still available at http://shell.n.ml.org/n/package-maint/
--
Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.redhat.com/djr/ http://
upset: *** warning package libbonobo2 requires non-existent package lbbonobo20
upset: *** warning package libbonobo2 requires non-existent package ibiconv2
Fixed by changing the require lines to:
requires: cygwin ORBit2 glib2-runtime libbonobo20 libiconv2 libintl3 libpopt0
libxml2 minires
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:56:00PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
>I hate to cross post like this, but I think it's appropriate for the
>question posed...
>
>On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> I've set up the categories for cygwin:
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 03:37:46PM -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>| You wrote in the setup.hint (e.g. libbonobo2):
>| category: GNOME
>|
>| Do we have this category now? Christopher?
>
>I've been using the GNOME category in
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:14:19PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Very simple question: is Gnome a Debian category?
>
>The cygwin packages are based on gnome categories.
>
>This. Is a recording.
Unfortunately, cosmic rays affected the recording.
The correct recording is:
The. Cygwin packages
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
When everyone has accounts and has indicated assent, I will reassign the
ownership of the groups.
Ok. I do indicate assent, already have an account and already have the
required perms, thanks.
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
But I want first only think about ... mingw-bzip2 integration
I've done some work on this, but currently given up for the moment,
contact me for a status update before speding time on this one.
:) This is really the tiniest problem of all. I will spend no se
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
The. Cygwin packages are based on Debian categories.
I'll patch upset to ignore packages completely with Categories not in
Debian. With a fatal, not just a warning. Ok?
In the meantime I have my upset/Cygwin patches here:
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/patche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Faylor wrote:
| Very simple question: is Gnome a Debian category?
Actually, it is a category in testing, unstable, and experimental.
(GNOME 2.x isn't in stable at all).
So I guess that means we can use it. Thanks.
Yaakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:38:18PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>Christopher Faylor schrieb:
>>The. Cygwin packages are based on Debian categories.
>
>I'll patch upset to ignore packages completely with Categories not in
>Debian. With a fatal, not just a warning. Ok?
No. It is not worth the effort.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:38:26PM -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>| Very simple question: is Gnome a Debian category?
>
>Actually, it is a category in testing, unstable, and experimental.
>(GNOME 2.x isn't in stable at all).
>
>So I guess that means we can use it. Thank
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:38:18PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
>>>
The. Cygwin packages are based on Debian categories.
I'll patch upset to ignore packages completely with Categories not in
Debian. With a fatal, not just a warning. Ok?
No. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Faylor wrote:
| Please post a URL showing this. Thanks.
Showing what? That it's a category in debian?
http://packages.debian.org/testing/
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/
Or did I misunderstand
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:38:26PM -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >| Very simple question: is Gnome a Debian category?
> >
> >Actually, it is a category in testing, unstable, and experimental.
> >(GNOME 2.x isn't in stable at all).
> >
>
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:33:22PM -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>| Please post a URL showing this. Thanks.
>
>Showing what? That it's a category in debian?
>
>http://packages.debian.org/testing/
>http://packages.debian
[snip]
> > An argument for demand-downloaded .mo files, then?
>
> An argument for simply adding the translations to res.rc as
> localized STRINGTABLES.
MESSAGETABLES
Then you can use FormatMessage() and things are much less brain-bamaging.
--
Gary R. Van Sic
Christopher Faylor wrote:
This is the list of sections that I found in
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz :
admin electroni interpret misc perl tex
base embedded kde net pythontext
comm games libdevel news science uti
44 matches
Mail list logo
