Please upload: ImageMagick 6.4.0.6-1

Please upload the new and long overdue ImageMagick package. Actually this are four packages, find links below. Since upstream version 6.3.8-5 of ImageMagick the following changes were made by the ImageMagick team: Renames: /usr/include => /usr/include/ImageMagick libMagick => libMagickCore li

Re: ImageMagick renamed runtime lib names

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 20 19:30, Volker Quetschke wrote: Since upstream version 6.3.8-5 of ImageMagick the following changes were made: Renames: /usr/local/include => /usr/local/include/ImageMagick libMagick => libMagickCore libWand => libMagickWand Magick-config (d

ImageMagick renamed runtime lib names

Since upstream version 6.3.8-5 of ImageMagick the following changes were made: Renames: /usr/local/include => /usr/local/include/ImageMagick libMagick => libMagickCore libWand => libMagickWand Magick-config (deprecated) => MagickCore-config Wand-config (deprecated) => MagickWand-config And

Re: [GTG] Re: [ITA, RFU] libgcrypt-1.4.0-1

Corinna Vinschen wrote: Volker? On Mar 11 15:57, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Volker Quetschke writes: > I just looked into the ImageMagick stuff and I would also like to keep > grace. By the way, there is a grace version sitting in test for more than a year now. What about that v

Re: [GTG] Re: [ITA, RFU] libgcrypt-1.4.0-1

Gergely Budai wrote: I'm slightly irritated. Is there some hidden agreement between you and Volker to take over all his packages? If so, it would be nice if we would know about that. No there is no hidden agreement between us, neither did I want to take over all his packages. Well, lets ma

Re: [RFU] gnupg-1.4.8-2

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 5 20:51, Gergely Budai wrote: http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.8-2-src.tar.bz2 \ http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.8-2.tar.bz2 \ http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/setup.hint Uploaded. I added bash and tar to th

Re: [ITA] gnupg-1.4.8-1

David Rothenberger wrote: On 3/3/2008 11:47 AM, Gergely Budai wrote: Package location: = http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.8-1-src.tar.bz2 This doesn't build for me, but maybe that's because I already have GPG installed? Only the tests fail. Making all in c

Re: [ITA] gnupg-1.4.8-1

As the current maintainer of gnupg I don't mind passing the maintainership to Gergely. I didn't thoroughly test the package but it looks good on a first glance. This does not need to be a test package, if no problems arise this should be "curr". If no one beats me to it I will do more test later

Re: Please upload: ImageMagick 6.3.0.1-2

Eric Blake wrote: > According to Volker Quetschke on 11/5/2006 2:45 PM: >> Please upload: > >> ... > > Done, and sorry for not more closely reviewing the -1 version (cgf's wet > blanket caught up with me). I assume you wanted 6.0.4-1 left as previous, >

Please upload: ImageMagick 6.3.0.1-2

The new ImageMagick 6.3.0.1-2 version fixes most of the issues Charles found. Previously I didn't enable X11 as I was only using convert and friends, unfortunately that left a non-working display.exe. -fixed- There was a packaging bug in the perl module that prevented /usr/share/doc/cygwin/ImageM

Re: [ITP-adopt] ImageMagick 6.3.0.1 - 2nd try

Charles Wilson wrote: (snip) > Furthermore, there are some packaging issues in the main ImageMagick > package: > > > /usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.3.0/www/subversion.html > /usr/share/ImageMagick-6.3.0/ChangeLog > /usr/share/ImageMagick-6.3.0/config/coder.xml > /usr/share/ImageMagick-6.3.0/con

[ITP-adopt] ImageMagick 6.3.0.1 - 2nd try

Thanks to Yaakov's hints this now builds without special patches. http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/ImageMagick/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.3.0.1-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.3.0.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://www.

Re: [ITP-adopt] ImageMagick 6.3.0.1

Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > Volker Quetschke wrote: > | The only problem is that due to a MakeMaker problem, see > | <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00024.html> > | the build is not completely self contained. An extra patch for > | MM_Unix.pm is needed. >

Re: [ITP-adopt] ImageMagick 6.3.0.1

Sorry, typo in the URLs. Fixed below. > As ImageMagick is a dependency for XmGrace and other packages I'm > proposing to adopt ImageMagick. I followed Yaakov's Cygports > packaging and divided it in four packages. > > The only problem is that due to a MakeMaker problem, see >

[ITP-adopt] ImageMagick 6.3.0.1

As ImageMagick is a dependency for XmGrace and other packages I'm proposing to adopt ImageMagick. I followed Yaakov's Cygports packaging and divided it in four packages. The only problem is that due to a MakeMaker problem, see the build is not

Please upload: gnupg-1.4.5-1

New upstream version using libintl8 and containing a patch for the '--refresh-keys' problem. Please upload: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.5-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.5-1-src.tar.bz2 V

Re: [ITP] cygport

Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: I would like to propose my cygport package as a new package building/maintaining method, as well as a new package for the distribution. This still needs two more votes and a GTG. In the meantime, I've made an update. New URLs:

Re: Please upload: gnupg-1.4.2.1-1

Eric Blake wrote: According to Volker Quetschke on 2/24/2006 5:21 PM: New upstream version, please upload: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1

Please upload: gnupg-1.4.2.1-1

New upstream version, please upload: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1-src.tar.bz2 Regards Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from

Re: SECURITY: gnupg (CVE-2006-0455)

Hi Yaakov, Applications relying on GnuPG to authenticate digital signatures may incorrectly believe a signature has been verified. Solution: upgrade to 1.4.2.1. I got the hint ;) Expect a new version in the next week or so. Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.

Re: upset warning from recent grace setup.hint

Christopher Faylor wrote: upset: *** warning package grace requires non-existent package libjpeg-62 I changed that to libjpeg62. Oops, thanks! I changed that here too. Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3

Please upload: (stable) grace-5.1.19-1 and (test) grace-5.99.0-1

Please upload grace-5.1.19-1 (new upstream release) and grace-5.99.0-1 (development version, as test). The grace-5.1.17 version can be removed. New setup hint: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/setup.hint URLs: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.19-1.tar.bz2 http://www.s

Attn: xemacs maintainer: xemacs fails after upgrading postgresql to 8.0.4-1

After updating my installed packages to the current versions with setup.exe xemacs 21.4.17-1 started to complain about a missing pq.dll in my path. Downgrading postgresql to 7.4.5-1 fixes this problem, but that is obviously not a permanent solution. Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) avai

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

Corinna Vinschen wrote: including a list of ALL packages you maintain. gnupg grace libgcrypt libgpg-error Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D signature.asc Description: O

[package updates] libgpg-error/libgcrypt/gnupg

I updated these packages to the latest upstream versions. (Yes, i know gnupg just released the RC2 for version 1.4.2, but this means 1.4.1 is still the last released version.) Please upload: URLs: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/libgpg-error/libgpg-error-1.1-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cy

[PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.18-1

This is a package update to a new upstream version. Please upload. URLs: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.18-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.18-1-src.tar.bz2 No cygwin related changes, see fo

[package update] remove test status of gnupg 1.4.0-2

After getting some confirmations that gnupg 1.4.0 also seems to work for other users I'd like to promote it from test to current. This is the new setup.hint. Please delete the old gnupg-1.2.6-1.* and gnupg-1.4.0-1.* versions so that the

Re: [pakage updates] gnupg 1.2.6-2 / gnupg 1.4.0-2

Hi Lapo, http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.0-2.tar.bz2 For what is worth I'm using this both alone and together with enigmail/thunderbird with no problem (even downloading keys from keyservers). I also verified that it works. Do you thing this is enough to promote it from test to

[pakage updates] gnupg 1.2.6-2 / gnupg 1.4.0-2

According to the discussion in I prepared new gnupg packages that contain the mentioned fix for the keyserver helper programs. Please upload, the 1.2.6-2 version is the stable version for cygwin and 1.4.0-2 is still a test package. http://w

Re: [testpackage] gnupg 1.4.0-1

Hi David, I'm having a problem retrieving keys from keyservers with this release. With the default configuration, the keyserver helper programs die with a message that they can't find the cygwin1.dll. The problem is that by default, gnupg sets the PATH to /usr/sbin/gnupg when it invokes these tools

[testpackage] gnupg 1.4.0-1

Hi, as the new gnupg 1.4.0 version includes some major feature changes, although it is expected to be fully compatible to older versions, I decided to release it as a test package first. See for the official announcement. Please u

[package update] gnupg 1.2.6-1

Hi! There is already a gnupg 1.4.0 upstream, but I just finished this one. Please upload. http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.6-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.6-1-src.tar.bz2 The setup.hint changed s

Re: [ITP] mathomatic-11.5-1

Hi! I've updated my not yet approved package of mathomatic to the latest upstream version. http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/mathomatic/ (also via setup at http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/) It has the wanted changes from Volker, for which it got a GTG, and it has 2 votes. Th

Re: what about LDAP support in GnuPG?

Hi Lapo, Volker, did you think about adding it? That way, LDAP-based keyserver can be contacted. All that is required to have the support is to have openldap-devel installed at compile-time: GnuPG's configure will auto-detect and use it. I'm overdue with gnupg 1.2.6 anyway, yes it will contain LDAP

Re: [ITP] t1lib: Library for generating character- and string-glyphs from Adobe Type 1 fonts

I would like to contribute and maintain the t1lib package: * http://site.n.ml.org/info/t1lib/ (Homepage) * http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/libs/graphics/ (Download location) This packacke is a prerequisite for xpdf, a PDF Viewer for X, which I will announce shortly. +1 Volker -- PGP/GPG key

Re: [ITP] libgcrypt-1.2.0-2

Hi! Sorry, my fault, misread your repliy. I already described why I don't do it dynamically. Anyway, what is the problem with the great patches? You can open an editor and search for +++ and you'll see that the interesting files are always Makefile.am & configure.in. Patchfiles are not for readin

Re: [ITP] libgpg-error-1.0-2

I would like to maintain the cygwin-port of the libgpg-error library. This is a library that defines common error values for all GnuPG components. It's basically some refactoring-as-a-lib of code common to all those projects? In which version do they begin to "need" it? I didn't check thorougly, bu

[ITP] libgcrypt-1.2.0-2

As advertised, I would like to maintain the cygwin-port of the libgcrypt library. Libgcrypt is a general purpose cryptographic library based on the code from GnuPG. It provides functions for all cryptographic building blocks: symmetric ciphers, hash algorithms, MACs, public key algorithms, large

[ITP] libgpg-error-1.0-2

I would like to maintain the cygwin-port of the libgpg-error library. This is a library that defines common error values for all GnuPG components. Among these are GPG, GPGSM, GPGME, GPG-Agent, libgcrypt, Libksba, DirMngr, Pinentry, SmartCard Daemon and possibly more in the future. This package was

Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.17-1

Ping!? Hi! This is a package update to a new upstream version. Please upload. URLs: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.17-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.17-1-src.tar.bz2 No cygwin related changes, s

[PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.17-1

Hi! This is a package update to a new upstream version. Please upload. URLs: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.17-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.17-1-src.tar.bz2 No cygwin related changes, see

Re: Attn: cvs maintainer

Ping! A gentle remainder after one week. I recently had some problems with the current cvs version (See if you really want to know which exactly ;) ) but I found out that using a newer cvs version solved my problems. Can you please update the

Attn: cvs maintainer

I recently had some problems with the current cvs version (See if you really want to know which exactly ;) ) but I found out that using a newer cvs version solved my problems. Can you please update the cygwin cvs package? To spare you some wo

Re: [ITP] cppunit-1.9.14

Hi Harold, | I want to contribute/maintain cppunit. | Canonical website: http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/ Pro from me. Just need one more vote now. I've been using the package for creating unit tests, so I give it my own GTG review. Let's get that extra vote. Sounds like a usfull package. +1 fr

Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-2

Hi! Once LessTif 0.93.94 is no longer marked test this package will become the current version. Harold just did this, can someone please upload/change the setup.hint file? URL: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/setup.hint (or just change curr:, test: to: prev: 5.1.12-1 curr: 5.1.14-2 ) Some

[PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-2

This is a test package for the current upstream version. *ATTENTION* LessTif 0.93.94 (also a test version) *is* required!! Once LessTif 0.93.94 is no longer marked test this package will become the current version. Harold just did this, can someone please upload/change the setup.hint file? URL: htt

Re: [NEW TEST PACKAGE]: grace-5.1.14-2

This is a test package for the current upstream version. *ATTENTION* LessTif 0.93.94 (also a test version) *is* required!! Erm... why did you then remove lesstif from the "requires" line?!? *blush* I didn't remove it, it was already missing in the old releases. (But it is linked in statically in 5.

[NEW TEST PACKAGE]: grace-5.1.14-2

This is a test package for the current upstream version. *ATTENTION* LessTif 0.93.94 (also a test version) *is* required!! Once LessTif 0.93.94 is no longer marked test this package will become the current version. NEWS * Grace now uses the XmHTML library to display the online help. Please upl

Re: [ITP] neon (A WebDAV library required by Subversion)

This has my vote +1 (This might come in twice, I accidentally used a wrong from adress before, only one +1 is intended ;) ) Neon is a WebDAV client library, which is required by subversion. (Dave Slusher's candidate subversion package currently bundles neon.) This package would reduce the need f

Re: [ITP] apr, apr-util

Also +1 for this package. Max Bowsher wrote: APR is the Apache Portable Runtime. APR-util is an addon package to APR containing non-core useful features. Both are required by Subversion. I have prototype packages installed on my machine right now. I'll make apr, then apr-util, sequentially availa

Re: Uploaded: [test] patchutils-0.2.29-1

Hi Max, I've uploaded patchutils-0.2.29-1 (marked test, as it is my first official package). Errm, can you please consider patchutils-0.2.30pre1.tar.bz2? The difference to .29 is a fix that * src/filterdiff.c (do_unified): Handle no-newline line counts correctly. I tripped over and

Re: Pending Packages List, 2004-03-27 - please upload XmHTML 3.2-1

Hi! Please upload XmHTML, I'd like to update grace to a version which uses it. It got the required third vote, and is GTG. Volker Z's packages should be here: -- cut here #!/bin/bash

Re: [ITP] XmHTML: A widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text

Hi! Volker> Is cygipc required? I guess cygserver/cygipc is handled by the Volker> XFree86 dependency. Yes this is true. Here is the new setup.hint file. Errm, no! It still contains cygipc. I just wanted to ask here to upload the package, but the setup.hint should be fixed first. Volker -

Re: [ITP] XmHTML: A widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text

Hi Volker, Here is the setup.hint file: sdesc: "XmHTML provides a widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text" ldesc: "XmHTML provides a widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text." category: Libs Web XFree86 requires: cygwin cygipc expat lesstif libfontconfig1 libfreetype26

Re: Pending Packages List, 2004-03-27

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: This is the list of pending packages as of Saturday, March 27, 2004. If you see something missing, please let the list know. Package: XmHTML 3.2-1 [2004-01-16] Description: XmHTML provides a widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text Proposal: http://cygwin.

[package update] gnupg 1.2.4-1

Now that gnupg is back, please upload. Volker Quetschke wrote: Hmm, I had the 1.2.4 version ready for a while, but forgot to mention it. I was asked for the links, here they are: Changes since version 1.2.2-3: * New upstream version NOTES - You find build instructions for a windows native

Re: Possible legal problem with ccrypt? [Was: Re: Pending Packages List, 2004-02-13]

Hmm, I had the 1.2.4 version ready for a while, but forgot to mention it. I was asked for the links, here they are: Changes since version 1.2.2-3: * New upstream version NOTES - You find build instructions for a windows native executable (MinGW) after unpacking the source (see gnupg.README f

Re: Possible legal problem with ccrypt? [Was: Re: Pending Packages List, 2004-02-13]

No, I wouldn't, but I didn't intend on that being the only statement. Consider this: The gpg which we distribute contains the *exact* same cipher, AES{128,192,256}, as ccrypt plus gpg also has twofish & blowfish. The last time I checked, those two were also considered "strong" encryption ciph

Re: [Review - Good to Go!] XmHTML 3.2-1: widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2

Hi! Rafael> I haven't tried building anything that uses XmHTML, but I'm making the Rafael> assumption that since the testhtml program builds and works, that should not be Rafael> an issue. I build this especially for grace, which right now shows it's help with lynx in an xterm window.

Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-1 - WITHDRAWN

can override the VendorShell. Harold Volker Quetschke wrote: Harold, Okay, with this additional info, I suggest rebuilding your 5.1.12 version against the new LessTif libs and on an updated Cygwin installation and see if that build works. I just did this, using shared libraries. It fails the sam

Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-1 - WITHDRAWN

Harold Volker Quetschke wrote: Hi Harold, grace 5.1.14 crashes under certain circumstances. The 5.1.12 version doesn't! (All libraries linked in static) OK, this was very confusing, what I meant was that 5.1.12 was linked using static libraries. I'm even not sure if this was really the

Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-1 - WITHDRAWN

Hi Harold, grace 5.1.14 crashes under certain circumstances. The 5.1.12 version doesn't! (All libraries linked in static) OK, this was very confusing, what I meant was that 5.1.12 was linked using static libraries. I'm even not sure if this was really the case, but the executable is 1 meg bigger t

Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-1 - WITHDRAWN

I'm really sorry for the confusion, but discussion on cygwin-xfree revealed a problem either in grace, but more propably in lesstif. grace 5.1.14 crashes under certain circumstances. The 5.1.12 version doesn't! (All libraries linked in static) I'd like to withdraw the 5.1.14 version until a solutio

Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-1

Oops, ) This is a package update from a new upstream version. ) I also patched grace to use /usr/share/man and /usr/share/info. ) http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/setup.hint ) http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/grace-5.1.14-1.tar.bz2 ) http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/grace-5.1.14-1-src.tar.bz2 U

[PACKAGE UPDATE]: grace-5.1.14-1

Hi! This is a package update from a new upstream version. I also patched grace to use /usr/share/man and /usr/share/info. Please upload. URLs: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/setup.hint http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/grace-5.1.14-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/grace-5.1.14-1-s

[PACKAGE UPDATE]: gnupg-1.2.2-3

Hi! This is a respin with cygwin 1.5.5 for the cygwin gnupg package. I also switched to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/info and use _update-info-dir now instead of a postinstall script. Please keep gnupg 1.2.2-1 as prev, delete the test version. Changes since version 1.2.2-2: * Respin with cygwin

[Ready for test/1.5.1] gnupg-1.2.2-2

I recompiled gnupg-1.2.2 for Cygwin 1.5.1. Changes: - version 1.2.2-2 - * Some changes to use current gettext. setup.hint: # No comment sdesc: "GnuPG is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage." ldesc: "GNU Privacy Guard is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage.

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

Hi Daniel, I got my source archive from a server in France, but I just noticed, that the author's "original" site is up again: http://knackered.knackered.org/angus/psutils/ Here you can download the source, and it does *not* contain the Makefile. You probably have the Debian patched version. M

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

Hi Daniel, [...] Well, beside the fact that you don't provide a patch to restore the original source archive. This is the main (?) reason to provide the patch, it is there to get back the official sources. Grr @!%$, forgot to put it into the source archive again :) Fixed. The original source arc

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

Hi Daniel, I fixed the points from your mail. The new packages are available under the same URLs as before: http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/psutils_cygwin/psutils-1.17-1.tar.bz2 http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/psutils_cygwin/psutils-1.17-1-src.tar.bz2 ... The REAME now tells you how to build fr

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

Hi! +1 for the package from here. as seen at http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg01132.html the psutils disappeared from the TeX-distribution and are AFAICS not yet a seperate package. The unsupported packages on Jan's site seem to be lost as well, so I compiled it from source and

Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! | Actually, maybe the postinstall *should* use -e, not -f - just in case | someone wants to do some symlink trickery. Changed and uploaded! Volker - -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B

Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Igor, | Hope the following chunk helps: | | #!/bin/sh | [ ! -e "/etc/gracerc" ] && cp -a /etc/gracerc.default /etc/gracerc | [ ! -e "/etc/gracerc.user" ] && cp -a /etc/gracerc.user.default /etc/gracerc.user | | And include /etc/gracerc.default and /

Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 |>Hmm, I thought the: |> |>- -Recommended reading: |>+Recommended reading: ( files are in /usr/grace/ ) |> |>would be enough for that. | | Here is the file as it is now, |-indented: | | | GRACE - GRaphing, Advanced Computation and Exploration of da

Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! |1. grace |... |>>OK, I've completed the review I began there. I have the following |>>notes: |>> |>>- The warning about gracerc and gracerc.user being overwritten on |>>reinstall is in the README. I'm not sure very many people will read |>

Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I send the last mail before I read your mail Earnie. |>>> 1. grace |>>> ... |>> Max did a review in: |>> ~ |>> |>> and all proposed changes are applied to the packages at the url |>> mention

Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! |>>1. grace |>> |>>date : 25 Nov 2002 |>>version: 5.1.12-1 |>>status : updated package available for review |>>notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html |>>reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00254.h

Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! | 1. grace | | date : 25 Nov 2002 | version: 5.1.12-1 | status : updated package available for review | notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html | reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00254.html | vo

Re: grace Review (Re: Pending packages status)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! |>>>I updated to grace 5.1.12, the new urls are: |>>>~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1.tar.bz2 |>>>~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1-src.tar.bz2 |>>>~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/setup.hint The urls above now points to t

Re: grace Review (Re: Pending packages status)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Max, |>I updated to grace 5.1.12, the new urls are: |>~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1.tar.bz2 |>~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1-src.tar.bz2 |>~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/setup.hint | | I've never used grace, but it'

Re: Pending packages status

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! | 1. grace | | date : 25 Nov 2002 | version: 5.1.10-1 | status : not reviewed | notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html | votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) | url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2 |

Re: Unusual request: get bison 1.35 back as prev version

ompatible download place for bison 1.35 on ooo.ximian.com. Bye Volker Martin Hollmichel Tools OpenOffice.org Project Lead Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:23:55AM +0100, Volker Quetschke wrote: Can I suggest that a much less intrusive solution would be to provide patches

Re: Unusual request: get bison 1.35 back as prev version

Can I suggest that a much less intrusive solution would be to provide patches to the affected .y files to get them to work with the latest version of bison? Then people just have to apply a patch and move on, rather than having to download an executable and figure out what to do with it. Hmm, ye

Re: Unusual request: get bison 1.35 back as prev version

Hi! The problem with this scenario is that it requires that a user revert their version of bison just for this package. It also assumes that bison is not going to change. That is not the case. There is a new version of bison coming soon. So the old version will soon be 1.75. So, if I put bac

Re: Unusual request: get bison 1.35 back as prev version

Hi! Earnie Boyd wrote: >> (This request is directed to the bison maintainer, propably Christopher) >> >> The reason why I would like to get back access to the "old" bison 1.35 >> version is, that it is a prerequisite for the build of OpenOffice 1.0.2. > > And you're uncapable of building this vers

Unusual request: get bison 1.35 back as prev version

Hi! (This request is directed to the bison maintainer, propably Christopher) The reason why I would like to get back access to the "old" bison 1.35 version is, that it is a prerequisite for the build of OpenOffice 1.0.2. The cygwin environment is used to provide all the tools that are needed to

Re: [ITP] grace 5.1.10

Hi! As I needed this program for my work anyway I packaged grace for cygwin. Grace is great for data analysis/presentation and it compiled OOTB. Hmm, maybe I should have done a bit more advertising. ;-) See http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/ for more infos on grace. Bye Volker -- PG

Re: Pending packages status

Hi Pavel, 1. xerces-c ... 2. xinetd ... 3. chkconfig ... You probably missed my package proposal from yesterday: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html Bye Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913

[ITP] grace 5.1.10

Hi! As I needed this program for my work anyway I packaged grace for cygwin. Grace is great for data analysis/presentation and it compiled OOTB. I only changed the default on-line documentation viewer from netscape (obviosly not there) to lynx and the default editor to nano. Here are the setup.h

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.5-2

Hi! I'm preparing the gnupg 1.2.1 version right now, and I like the packaging with the signed files :-), but I found a few problems in the script: ... I found another one: all) prep && conf && build && install && \ strip && pkg && name=$0 text="SCRIPT" sigfile && spkg && \ finish &&

[PACKAGE UPDATE]: gnupg-1.2.1-1

Hi! This is an update release for the cygwin gnupg package. See: < http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2002q4/000256.html > for details. Changes for the cygwin version: * New upstream release. All patches for cygwin, except the patches to build gpg with a newer gettext, went into th

Re: Signed scripts and packages [Was: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.5-2]

Hi, >> 2. text=... is set, but never used. > text is used in sigfile() to print which file must be signed: > > echo "$text signature need to be updated"; \ Oops, I was blind :-) Bye Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.5-2

Hi, Lapo Luchini wrote: 3 build script updated to support digital signatures 4 source package now contains original's package detached gpg signature by the author and detached signatures on the script itself and on the patch, signed by me 5 signatures can be checked with "./rsync-2.5.5-2.sh c

Re: gpg 1.2.0 reports that it runs on Cygwin32...

Hi Pavel! > Here is a snippet from a clear text signature made by gpg-1.2.0. > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (Cygwin32) > > > I think Cygwin32 is obosleted by and should be replaced by Cygwin. Ok, I will change that in the next cygwin version, but the Cygwin32 is fro

Re: Package review status

Hi! Sorry, replied to the wrong mailing list in the first place. > Hi Robert, > >> Right, well I'll happily run generate checksums of what I download, and >> if the poster to here posts the expected checksums, in a gpg signed >> message, then we can be fairly sure that whomever sent the email, >

[NEW TEST PACKAGE]: gnupg-1.2.0-1

Hi, the people at www.gnupg.org released a new GnuPG version, GnuPG 1.2.0. See: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2002q3/000252.html I build a cygwin package, but I'd like to have some other people to test this new version before doing a "real" release. Please upload the package

[PACKAGE UPDATE]: gnupg-1.0.7-3

Hi! This an bugfix update of gnupg 1.0.7, it fixes the following point: * Fixed locale files: - Now the message files do have a base filename. Here's the setup.hint and the URLs: # No comment sdesc: "GnuPG is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage." ldesc: "GNU Privacy Guard i

Re: gnupg-1.0.7-2: Message files are missing the base filename

Hi! > In gnupg-1.0.7-2 all the message files are missing the base filename: > > usr/share/locale/el/ > usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/ > usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/.mo Thanks for the report! I will search for them. ;-) > Ciao > Volker Bye Volker msg03688/pgp0.pgp Description:

Re: PACKAGE UPDATE]: gnupg-1.0.7-2

Hallo! > I see. You can't do anything. People installing test versions > should know what they are doing. > >>>The 1.0.7-2 is the version with textmode support and bugfixes, so how to >>>proceed now? > > The new setup.hint file on your web page is definitely incorrect > since it has 1.1.90 n

Re: PACKAGE UPDATE]: gnupg-1.0.7-2

Hallo Corinna, > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> P.S.: I droped the test: 1.1.90-1 line because that package needs other >>> libraries. What is the prefered way when the test package has other >>> requirements? >> >> I don't understand the point. If there's a 1.1.90 version and it has >> n

  1   2   >