On Aug 24 09:28, David Allsopp wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 23 20:00, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > Jon Turney wrote:
> > > > I'm confused here: /usr/lib/ocaml/camlheaderd[di] look like
> > > > executables (according to file etc.)
> > > >
> > > > If they genuinely aren't, then perhaps
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 23 20:00, David Allsopp wrote:
> > Jon Turney wrote:
> > > I'm confused here: /usr/lib/ocaml/camlheaderd[di] look like
> > > executables (according to file etc.)
> > >
> > > If they genuinely aren't, then perhaps they shouldn't have execute
> > > permission (which
On Aug 23 20:00, David Allsopp wrote:
> Jon Turney wrote:
> > I'm confused here: /usr/lib/ocaml/camlheaderd[di] look like executables
> > (according to file etc.)
> >
> > If they genuinely aren't, then perhaps they shouldn't have execute
> > permission (which is I think what is causing them to be
Jon Turney wrote:
> On 13/07/2022 16:41, David Allsopp wrote:
> >
> >> 3) Interesting - on my machine, the camlheader[di] files had the .exe
> >> extensions. I did some digging around and found the files are *built*
> >> without the .exe suffix, and even *initially installed* without the
> >>
Hi Jon,
>
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> Please accept this literally priceless gold star for adopting this package
Thank you very much for the valuable and shiny award!
I've also pushed the cygport and corresponding patches to the git repository.
William
On 23/07/2022 17:38, William Hu via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Yeah, that seems plausible, but I'm not clear why we are seeing
different behaviour...
After a long period of poking around for differences, I think I found the error
- I had the `noacl` option activated in /etc/fstab which was
>
> Yeah, that seems plausible, but I'm not clear why we are seeing
> different behaviour...
>
After a long period of poking around for differences, I think I found the error
- I had the `noacl` option activated in /etc/fstab which was preventing chmod
and executable bits from working properly.
> I added 'ocaml' to your authorized packages.
>
> Please go ahead and upload (perhaps as a test release?) when you are ready.
>
> Please see [1] for how to upload packages and push to the packaging git
> repository.
>
> [1] https://cygwin.com/packages.html
>
Great, thank you so much for the help
On 13/07/2022 16:41, David Allsopp wrote:
3) Interesting - on my machine, the camlheader[di] files had the .exe
extensions. I did some digging around and found the files are *built*
without the .exe suffix, and even *initially installed* without the .exe
suffix, but ultimately come out with
On 13/07/2022 03:56, William Hu via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Apologies, meant to click reply-all.
Hi Jon,
Thanks for all of the detailed feedback - I'll test the package more
thoroughly next time.
I added 'ocaml' to your authorized packages.
Please go ahead and upload (perhaps as a test release?)
Hi David,
> I think this down to neglect - the PIC/shared versions of the runtime were
> contributed for a specific purpose and aren't properly maintained/tested
> AFAICT.
>
> I'm not sure that libcamlrun_shared can ever have worked on Cygwin, at least
> certainly not since OCaml 3.11 (which
William Hu wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > What were the missing symbols? With the OCaml 4.10 package, I hit
> problems with this:
> >
> > echo 'print_endline "hello, world"' > hello.ml
> >
> > ocamlc -custom -runtime-variant _shared -o hello.exe hello.ml
> >
> > I think that may be an issue upstream
Hi David,
> What were the missing symbols? With the OCaml 4.10 package, I hit problems
> with this:
>
> echo 'print_endline "hello, world"' > hello.ml
>
> ocamlc -custom -runtime-variant _shared -o hello.exe hello.ml
>
> I think that may be an issue upstream (libasmrun_shared.so IIRC is broken
> 1) libcamlrun: Oops, that's another oversight, forgot to look at the old
> patches. The other 3 patches seem unnecessary, but I had trouble linking
> either libcamlrun_shared.so or libcamlrun_shared.dll.a into a program
> (unresolved symbol errors). Added but it possibly needs further patching.
Apologies, meant to click reply-all.
Hi Jon,
Thanks for all of the detailed feedback - I'll test the package more
thoroughly next time.
1) libcamlrun: Oops, that's another oversight, forgot to look at the old
patches. The other 3 patches seem unnecessary, but I had trouble linking
either
On 05/07/2022 01:42, William Hu via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi Jon,
Oops, sorry about that. The patch and updated cygport are now attached.
Sending SSH key shortly.
Thanks.
Firstly, I notice that you dropped 4.10.0-libcamlrun_shared.patch. Can
you explain the reasoning behind that?
(After a
Hi Jon,
Oops, sorry about that. The patch and updated cygport are now attached.
Sending SSH key shortly.
Thanks,
William
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, July 4th, 2022 at 1:03 PM, Jon Turney
wrote:
> On 04/07/2022 03:03, William Hu via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I
On 04/07/2022 03:03, William Hu via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that the ocaml source package is currently unmaintained and the most
recent package version is 4.10.0, so I'd like to adopt the packages under it
(specifically, ocaml, ocaml-compiler-libs, ocaml-runtime, ocaml-doc,
Hello,
I noticed that the ocaml source package is currently unmaintained and the most
recent package version is 4.10.0, so I'd like to adopt the packages under it
(specifically, ocaml, ocaml-compiler-libs, ocaml-runtime, ocaml-doc,
ocaml-ocamldoc, and ocaml-source). Attached is a cygport file
On 2010-09-13, at 06:12, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
gcc3 is deprecated; distro packages should be built with gcc4, and all
Ports packages for Cygwin 1.7 are built with gcc4. So OCaml definitely
builds with gcc4.
I checked and yes it works.
How soon can you rebuild ocaml with gcc4 and
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 14:51 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
I think you should upload this version for the moment because I have
two potential problems with Yaakov's FlexDLL package that I need to
investigate:
1. It's based on an old version of FlexDLL, and IIRC OCaml needs
some of the
On 2010-09-09, at 21:07, Andrew Schulman wrote:
Auto gold star awarded: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#DD.
Ooooh, shiny! Thanks!
And a thanks from me - the OCaml package was way out of date, but I tried
once to build it for Cygwin and couldn't make it work.
But I'm cheating: I have
And a thanks from me - the OCaml package was way out of date, but I tried
once to build it for Cygwin and couldn't make it work.
But I'm cheating: I have insider information.
No holds barred here at cygwin.com.
On 2010-09-08, at 11:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Cool, thanks. Your packaging looks good, so this package is ok for
upload. I was just wondering if you would like me to upload the package
as is for now, or if I should wait for the FlexDLL-enabled version?
I think you should upload this
On Sep 9 14:51, Damien Doligez wrote:
On 2010-09-08, at 11:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Cool, thanks. Your packaging looks good, so this package is ok for
upload. I was just wondering if you would like me to upload the package
as is for now, or if I should wait for the FlexDLL-enabled
Cool, thanks. Your packaging looks good, so this package is ok for
upload. I was just wondering if you would like me to upload the package
as is for now, or if I should wait for the FlexDLL-enabled version?
I think you should upload this version for the moment because I have
two
On Sep 7 23:52, Damien Doligez wrote:
On 2010-09-06, at 16:43, Charles Wilson wrote:
Are you sure that your new version requires libncurses7? The only
current libncurses-dev package will cause you to link against
libncurses10...
Try
cygcheck /usr/bin/name-of-ocaml-exe
and
On Sep 8 10:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 7 23:52, Damien Doligez wrote:
On 2010-09-06, at 16:43, Charles Wilson wrote:
Are you sure that your new version requires libncurses7? The only
current libncurses-dev package will cause you to link against
libncurses10...
On 2010-09-08, at 10:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
wget http://yquem.inria.fr/~doligez/cygwin/ocaml-3.12.0-2-src.tar.bz2
wget http://yquem.inria.fr/~doligez/cygwin/ocaml-3.12.0-2.tar.bz2
Do you also have an URL to the new setup.hint file?
wget http://yquem.inria.fr/~doligez/cygwin/setup.hint
On Sep 8 10:35, Damien Doligez wrote:
On 2010-09-08, at 10:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
wget http://yquem.inria.fr/~doligez/cygwin/ocaml-3.12.0-2-src.tar.bz2
wget http://yquem.inria.fr/~doligez/cygwin/ocaml-3.12.0-2.tar.bz2
Do you also have an URL to the new setup.hint file?
wget
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 15:48 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
1. The tcl/tk bindings: they don't work out of the box with Cygwin's
tcl/tk, and I don't think there is much demand anyway.
Interesting, given that OCaml presumes that Cygwin's tcl/tk is Win32
(which it currently is), but Ports' X11
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 05:03:13AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 15:48 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
1. The tcl/tk bindings: they don't work out of the box with Cygwin's
tcl/tk, and I don't think there is much demand anyway.
Interesting, given that OCaml presumes that
On 9/7/2010 6:03 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Given the recent issues on the list, I think it's about time I ITA
tcl/tk.
More power to you, but I don't think cgf has gone anywhere...so tcltk
isn't yet orphaned.
--
Chuck
Am 07.09.2010, 16:42 Uhr, schrieb Christopher Faylor:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 05:03:13AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 15:48 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
1. The tcl/tk bindings: they don't work out of the box with Cygwin's
tcl/tk, and I don't think there is much
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:40:43PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 07.09.2010, 16:42 Uhr, schrieb Christopher Faylor:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 05:03:13AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 15:48 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
1. The tcl/tk bindings: they don't work out of the
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:55 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
This has already been decided. I was just waiting for some sign of life
from my friend the insight maintainer.
I guess I'll go ahead and pull insight from the release. That should
make things easier.
FWIW, Debian, Fedora, and
On 2010-09-06, at 16:43, Charles Wilson wrote:
Are you sure that your new version requires libncurses7? The only
current libncurses-dev package will cause you to link against
libncurses10...
Try
cygcheck /usr/bin/name-of-ocaml-exe
and see what DLLs it actually uses...
Also, new
On 9/7/2010 2:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:40:43PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Insight is dead for all practical purposes, but Tcl/Tk in Cygwin depending
on X11 rather than Win32 would be major regression. Not that I'd have time
to help though.
This has
Dear Cygwin packagers,
It looks like the ocaml package is abandoned: the current version
(OCaml 3.08.1) dates back to 2006, and the listed maintainer is
Igor Pechtchanski (from before he changed his name).
Unless it is by design that OCaml is held back to an obsolete version,
I would like to
On Sep 6 13:47, Damien Doligez wrote:
Dear Cygwin packagers,
It looks like the ocaml package is abandoned: the current version
(OCaml 3.08.1) dates back to 2006, and the listed maintainer is
Igor Pechtchanski (from before he changed his name).
Yes, Igor is AWOL for quite some time now,
On 9/6/2010 7:47 AM, Damien Doligez wrote:
This is the contents of my setup.hint file for the updated package,
mostly unchanged from Igor's version:
--
sdesc: The Objective Caml compiler and runtime
ldesc: Objective Caml is a
On 11/02/2010 23:05, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
You may want to take a look at how I built OCaml for Cygwin Ports:
http://cygwin-ports.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cygwin-ports/ports/trunk/lang/ocaml/
http://cygwin-ports.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cygwin-ports/ports/trunk/devel/flexdll/
(Yes,
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ITA] ocaml
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:05 AM
Before we start:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTWLL
I do
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:43:57AM -0800, Ed Keith wrote:
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
Subject: Re: [ITA] ocaml
To: cygwin-apps
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:05 AM
Before we start:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms
It has been brought to my attention that the ocaml package has been orphaned. I
am willing to take it over. I have never done this before, so please be patient
with me.
I believe I have the source package ready, but am still having problems
figuring out exactly how to package the bin, I am
On 2010/02/11 1:36 PM, Ed Keith wrote:
I would like to put the the source package out so people can find any
errors I may have made, but I do not have anywhere where I can park
such a large file. Does anyone have any suggestions?
There are a number sites out there that will host an open-source
Before we start:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTWLL
On 11/02/2010 15:36, Ed Keith wrote:
It has been brought to my attention that the ocaml package has been
orphaned. I am willing to take it over.
That's good news! You've chosen a bit of a challenge to start off with.
I believe I have
47 matches
Mail list logo
