Whatever happened to the idea of getting rid of all the extraneous \
crap in gbs? Was the idea rejected, or forgotten?
--
Chuck
Charles Wilson wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
false || true
As a bonus, this construct documents that this particular line can
return a false value.
I see. Well,
definition of the README -
readmelist() uses
${PkgReadMe}
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Miles
Sent: February 10, 2004 23:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pending patches for generic build script
Igor,
Small attempt at humour here
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Rafael Kitover wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Pending patches for generic build script
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Charles Wilson wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
false || true
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Lapo wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| Lapo, I have two patches from you (one dated 20030830[1], the other
| 20040122[2]; with some minor differences even after whitespace cleanup) --
| I assume you'd like me to apply
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Charles Wilson wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
false || true
As a bonus, this construct documents that this particular line can
return a false value.
I see. Well, this does look reasonably readable... Another problem with
set +e that I vaguely recall reading
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Ok, great! Since you're in favor of it (and you're the ultimate authority
on the gbs, I'm just temporarily handling the maintainer duties), it makes
me much more confident. I'll let Rafael test out the propagation of set
+e into functions, and then make the appropriate
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:17 PM
To: cygwin-appsatcygwin.com
Subject: RE: Pending patches for generic build script
Rafael,
Please try to set up your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in your
replies. Thanks. More below.
Oops
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Rafael Kitover wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:17 PM
To: cygwin-appsatcygwin.com
Subject: RE: Pending patches for generic build script
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Rafael Kitover wrote:
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:07 AM
To: Yaakov Selkowitz
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pending patches for generic build script
locally, mostly to eliminate things that I'm
-appsatcygwindotcom
Subject: Re: Pending patches for generic build script
locally, mostly to eliminate things that I'm already in the process of
applying, such as the '; \' - ' \' transformation, and I'd rather not
go through that again unless I have to. If the patch is the same, just
send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| Thanks for the patch. Some of it intersects with my and others' fixes (I
| planned to integrate patches in chronological order), but most of it is
| original and sounds very useful. It's on my queue. I'll use this message
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| Thanks for the patch. Some of it intersects with my and others' fixes (I
| planned to integrate patches in chronological order), but most of it is
| original and sounds very useful. It's on my queue. I'll use this message
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Lapo wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| Lapo, I have two patches from you (one dated 20030830[1], the other
| 20040122[2]; with some minor differences even after whitespace cleanup) --
| I assume you'd like me to apply the later one? Should I use the
| accompanying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| Is this new patch substantially different from your previous submission?
| The reason I'm asking is that I have your previous patch heavily edited
| locally, mostly to eliminate things that I'm already in the process of
|
Yaakov,
Thanks for the patch. Some of it intersects with my and others' fixes (I
planned to integrate patches in chronological order), but most of it is
original and sounds very useful. It's on my queue. I'll use this message
as a sort of a ChangeLog -- please let me know if you'd rather
20040109[3]). What I said about ChangeLogs
above applies here too.
This statement is absolutely correct!
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: February 10, 2004 08:22
To: Yaakov Selkowitz
Cc: Lapo Luchini; Alan Miles
Subject: Re: Pending patches for generic build script
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Alan Miles wrote:
Igor,
Thank-you for the update and patch consideration, and sorry for the
multiple postings - I thought my patches kept getting rejected [maybe
some meanness ... :) ] since I did not hear back from anyone after your
initial review. However, I could not
Igor,
Small attempt at humour here ...
I guess I was just trying to provide a means to get the listing inside the
readme, together was some variables like VER
reducing the maintainers job.
However, I will review your comments and suggestions etc.
[snip]
Umm, there are two statements above.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor and rlc,
Not sure which one (or both) of you is dealing with these, but I've got
one of my own patches for the build script, attached here.
To summarize and explain:
* provides variables for multiple binary packages, meaning that only the
'pkg'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
|Lapo Luchini: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00323.html
|Lapo Luchini: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00273.html
Please notice there's a newer version floating around, also.. and...
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:50PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I was going to reply to Chuck's original message, but here goes:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:38:50PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Here are the patches I have/had on my
Here are the patches I have/had on my 'pending' list for the
generic-build-script. Thanks for (permanently or even just temporarily)
handling these maintainance duties, Igor...
Some of these messages spawned threads and updated patches; be sure to
read all replies.
--
Chuck
Alan Miles: Diff
22 matches
Mail list logo
