I was maintaining ssmtp, but would like someone else to take it over.
I haven't touched it for months, haven't been using Cygwin, haven't
been reading the Cygwin mailing lists. I just happened to see
Corinna's headsup when I was guiltily searching for messages about it
I would have missed.
It is
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:43 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> NOTE: This is one mail before the last on this matter.
> LIST 1: PACKAGES WITH UNCLEAR OWNERSHIP
> ===
>
> dpkg Robert Collins or up for grabs?
> squid
It's about time that I replied... I've been swamped with more responsibilities
at work and haven't been able to maintain my packages. They are all out of
date. One collection (c-client and uw-imap*) has a security issue that would
be resolved by upgrading the package to the current released v
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 15:18 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> Sure. I could take these two.
Great. Thanks.
bye
ago
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Oct 26 15:18, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 16:02 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 26 13:17, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >
> > > > cygwin-x-doc
> > > > x-start-menu-icons
> > > >
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 16:02 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 26 13:17, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > > cygwin-x-doc
> > > x-start-menu-icons
> > > x-startup-scripts
> > > xwinwm
On Oct 26 13:17, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > cygwin-x-doc
> > x-start-menu-icons
> > x-startup-scripts
> > xwinwm
>
> These 4 were created by Harold Hunt and handed ove
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> cygwin-x-doc
> x-start-menu-icons
> x-startup-scripts
> xwinwm
These 4 were created by Harold Hunt and handed over to me.
I had to give up maintaining all X11 related packa
NOTE: This is one mail before the last on this matter.
To find also maintainers which are *accidentally* not subscribed to
cygwin-apps, I'm cross-posting to the cygwin mailing list. Please send
your replies only to the cygwin-apps mailing list, which *all*
maintainers should be subscribed to anyw
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
The following are missing
> LIST 5: MAINTAINED PACKAGES WITH OWNER
> ==
libEMF1
libEMF-devel
libEMF
Ciao
Volker
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
> other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
> a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,
> there's apparently a need to find
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following is useful information from me...
[snip]
xwinclip
I'm still listed as the maintainer of this and I declare it obsolete.
I'm not going to maintain it anymore and it doesn't need to exist
anymore, so please r
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> The following is useful information from me...
> [snip]
> > xwinclip
>
> I'm still listed as the maintainer of this and I declare it obsolete.
> I'm not going to maintain it anymore and it doesn't need to exist
> anymore, so please remove it from th
On Oct 10 08:28, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> The following is useful information from me... I'm giving some guidance
> on decisions that need to be made, but I've long since relinquished any
> responsibility to make those decisions, so just ignore my advice if you
> disagree, rather than getting a
The following is useful information from me... I'm giving some guidance
on decisions that need to be made, but I've long since relinquished any
responsibility to make those decisions, so just ignore my advice if you
disagree, rather than getting all uppity about how I'm not in charge and
should
On Oct 10 16:10, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > compface ??? (Dr. Volker Zell)
>
> Do you want a new package now, or should we wait if the current
> maintainer shows up again ?
As it suites you. You can also just wait for the end of the survey
(3 weeks left).
Corinna
-
I am the maintainer for cmake.
cmake William A. Hoffman
-Bill
At 09:08 AM 10/10/2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
>> other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> xwinclip
Isn't this one obsolete nowadays Harold ?
> compface ??? (Dr. Volker Zell)
Do you want a new package now, or should we wait if the current
maintainer shows up again ?
Ciao
Volker
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Lino Miguel Martins Tinoco
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I maintain ping.
>
> Have you seen the periodic complaints from people in the cygwin
> mailing list who claim to be unable to run ping? It works fine for
> me but there are ap
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
> other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
> a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,
> there's apparently a need to find
On Oct 7 10:54, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Lino Miguel Martins Tinoco wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I maintain ping.
>
> Have you seen the periodic complaints from people in the cygwin mailing
> list who claim to be unable to run ping? It works fine for me but t
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Lino Miguel Martins Tinoco wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I maintain ping.
Have you seen the periodic complaints from people in the cygwin mailing
list who claim to be unable to run ping? It works fine for me but there
are apparently some people for whom that is not the
Hi!
I maintain ping.
Cheers,
--Lino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Below are the results as of today 2005-10-03. It would be helpful if all
> maintainers could scan this lists again, so that we're sure that nothing
[snip]
> LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> ==
On Oct 5 11:22, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 12:15 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Thanks. I assume you also maintain xorg-x11-base, or is that done by
> > somebody else?
>
> Sorry, my cut & paste missed off that one. So yes xorg-x11-base too.
NP. Added to the list.
Corin
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 12:15 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 5 11:07, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > I maintain...
> >
> > xorg-x11-bin
> > xorg-x11-bin-dlls
> > xorg-x11-bin-lndir
> > xorg-x11-devel
> > xorg-x11-etc
> > xorg-x11-f100
> > xorg-x11-fcyr
> > xorg-x11-fenc
> > xorg-x11-fnts
> > xo
On Oct 5 11:07, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> I maintain...
>
> xorg-x11-bin
> xorg-x11-bin-dlls
> xorg-x11-bin-lndir
> xorg-x11-devel
> xorg-x11-etc
> xorg-x11-f100
> xorg-x11-fcyr
> xorg-x11-fenc
> xorg-x11-fnts
> xorg-x11-fscl
> xorg-x11-fsrv
> xorg-x11-libs-data
> xorg-x11-man-pages
> xorg-x11-man-
I maintain...
xorg-x11-bin
xorg-x11-bin-dlls
xorg-x11-bin-lndir
xorg-x11-devel
xorg-x11-etc
xorg-x11-f100
xorg-x11-fcyr
xorg-x11-fenc
xorg-x11-fnts
xorg-x11-fscl
xorg-x11-fsrv
xorg-x11-libs-data
xorg-x11-man-pages
xorg-x11-man-pages-html
xorg-x11-nest
xorg-x11-vfb
xorg-x11-xwin
xorg-x11-xwin-gl
A
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> =
> compface
I'll take this if the current maintainer does not reply. I need it for xemacs.
Ciao
Volker
On 10/3/05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[SNIP]
> clear
Wasn't this moved to obsolete?
Cheers,
Nicholas
On 10/2/05, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
[SNIP]
> >
> >> keychain Hack Kampbjorn or up for grabs?
> >> ncftp Hack Kampbjorn or up for grabs?
> >
> >
> > If Hack doesn't want these anymore, ditto on these.
>
> I would apreciate that.
Ok, then I'll get to work
> >
> > So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages,
> >
> > please reply to this mail within the next six weeks,
> >
> > including a list of ALL packages you maintain.
> >
I'm the maintainer for the following packages:
cramfs
e2fsimage
e2fsprogs
mtd
nfs
I maintain
a2ps
Dave
David Hudson | The Capital Group Companies | Location: BRO | Extension:
51887
Outside: 714-672-1887 | E-mail:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:47:01AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>FYI, Dan just released naim-0.11.8 (yes, from Fort Benning), so I'm
>assuming he's actively maintaining naim...
The purpose of this exercise is to see who is actually actively
maintaini
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Below are the results as of today 2005-10-03.
> [snip]
> LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> =
> [snip]
> naim
FYI, Dan just released naim-0.11.8 (yes, from Fort Benning), so I'
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
> other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
> a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,
> there's apparently a need to find
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Corinna,
agetty Up for grabs (so far Sergey Okhapkin)
chkconfig Up for grabs (so far Sergey Okhapkin)
initscriptsUp for grabs (so far Sergey Okhapkin)
sysvinit Up for grabs (so far Ser
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 23 12:40, Max Bowsher wrote:
Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 21 20:23, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
Hack Kampbjorn:
keychain
ncftp
wget
But my last windows computer at home is being hit by a deathstar battle
station. And I will don't read cyg
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:43:46 +0200, in gmane.os.cygwin.applications
you wrote:
>On Sep 28 20:10, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:06:31 -0500, in gmane.os.cygwin.applications
>> you wrote:
[SNIP]
>I don't think the FSF information given on
>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html qu
On Sep 28 20:10, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:06:31 -0500, in gmane.os.cygwin.applications
> you wrote:
>
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Lapo Luchini wrote:
> >> I'd say "up for grabs".
> >> I always used to say it's "low priority", but being so low i
Corinna,
> agetty Up for grabs (so far Sergey Okhapkin)
> chkconfig Up for grabs (so far Sergey Okhapkin)
> initscriptsUp for grabs (so far Sergey Okhapkin)
> sysvinit Up for grabs (so far Sergey Okhapkin)
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:30:55PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:20:35PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>>
libpopt0 Christopher Faylor
popt Christopher Faylor
>>>
>>>Actually, that's my pac
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:20:35PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
libpopt0 Christopher Faylor
popt Christopher Faylor
Actually, that's my package
I just took these because I thought they were related to rpm and I'm
ta
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:38:01 -0400, in gmane.os.cygwin.applications
you wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:20:35PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>>> libpopt0 Christopher Faylor
>>> popt Christopher Faylor
>>
>>Actually, that's my package
>
>I just
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:20:35PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>> libpopt0 Christopher Faylor
>> popt Christopher Faylor
>
>Actually, that's my package
I just took these because I thought they were related to rpm and I'm
taking on rpm. So, sorry
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:06:58 +0200, in gmane.os.cygwin.applications
you wrote:
>On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
>> other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
>> a couple of packages which
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:06:31 -0500, in gmane.os.cygwin.applications
you wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> I'd say "up for grabs".
>> I always used to say it's "low priority", but being so low it didn't
>> get updated in months probably means that some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lapo Luchini wrote:
> I'd say "up for grabs".
> I always used to say it's "low priority", but being so low it didn't
> get updated in months probably means that someone else may well be
> more interested in it...
I'm interested in keeping this going.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> LIST 1: PACKAGES WITH UNCLEAR OWNERSHIP
> ===
>
> libungif Lapo Luchini or up for grabs?
I'd say "up for grabs".
I always used to say it's "low priority", but being so low it didn't
get up
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages,
>
> please reply to this mail within the next six weeks,
>
> including a list of ALL packages you maintain.
docbook-xml412
docbook-xml42
docbook-xml
> LIST 2: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> =
ccrypt
TeXmacs
ccrypt is up-to-date, with TeXmacs I have a problem with guile at the
moment.
Best Regards,
Andreas
--
http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl
On Sep 27 10:15, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On Sep 26 17:08, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > libpcreOBSOLETE (Yaakov S)
On Sep 27 09:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:58:05PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >According to Corinna Vinschen on 9/26/2005 5:06 AM:
> >>
> >> LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> >> =
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 26 17:08, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > libpcreOBSOLETE (Yaakov S)
> >
> > Did we find any packages still dependent on this?
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:04:03AM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
>On Tue, September 27, 2005 6:18 am, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:19:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>There is no clear maintainer. I was asking if you'd be interested in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 9/27/2005 7:22 AM:
>>I've uploaded new empty clear packages. I've not put the clear package
>>into the _obsolete category so far. Can I do this already?
>
>
> Uh, I'm still not convinced that this is the right way
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:55:59AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Sep 27 01:46, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:19:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> > >I've got a new release of ncurses which contains /usr/bin/clear.e
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:58:05PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>According to Corinna Vinschen on 9/26/2005 5:06 AM:
>>
>> LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
>> =
>>
>> gperf
>
>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:55:59AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Sep 27 01:46, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:19:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> > >I've got a new release of ncurses which contains /usr/bin/clear.e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) on 9/26/2005 4:08 PM:
>
>>> libpcreOBSOLETE (Yaakov S)
>
>
> Did we find any packages still dependent on this? Since it's still
> affected by the security vulnerability, I think it shoul
On Tue, September 27, 2005 6:18 am, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:19:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>There is no clear maintainer. I was asking if you'd be interested in
>>>making this available via ncurses.
>>>
>>>If you release a new versi
On Sep 27 01:46, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:19:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > >I've got a new release of ncurses which contains /usr/bin/clear.exe
> > >ready to go (but not yet copied into /release).
> > >
> > >Go
On Sep 26 17:08, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > libpcreOBSOLETE (Yaakov S)
>
> Did we find any packages still dependent on this? Since it's still
> affected by the security vulnerability,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:19:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >There is no clear maintainer. I was asking if you'd be interested in
> >>making this available via ncurses.
> >>
> >>If you release a new version of ncu
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:19:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>There is no clear maintainer. I was asking if you'd be interested in
>>making this available via ncurses.
>>
>>If you release a new version of ncurses which contributes a 'clear',
>>I'll delete the clear pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Corinna Vinschen on 9/26/2005 5:06 AM:
>
> LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> =
>
> gperf
cgf last released 2.7.2 in Dec 02:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce
Christopher Faylor wrote:
There is no clear maintainer. I was asking if you'd be interested in
making this available via ncurses.
If you release a new version of ncurses which contributes a 'clear',
I'll delete the clear package.
I've got a new release of ncurses which contains /usr/bin/clear
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:12:00PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>clear
>>
>>This comes from ncurses doesn't it? Is it being purposely dropped from
>>the ncurses distribution? Chuck?
>
>There is a clear package, containing only /usr/bin/clear.exe, that
>predated ncurse
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Since ncurses is in category Base, perhaps we should drop the clear package
from the distribution, and allow ncurses clear to take the place of this
package?
It looks like the standalone clear might have been a temporary workaround,
before ncurses was ported.
If by dr
Christopher Faylor wrote:
clear
This comes from ncurses doesn't it? Is it being purposely dropped from the
ncurses
distribution? Chuck?
There is a clear package, containing only /usr/bin/clear.exe, that
predated ncurses in the cygwin distro. (E.g. full.exe had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> libpcreOBSOLETE (Yaakov S)
Did we find any packages still dependent on this? Since it's still
affected by the security vulnerability, I think it should be removed.
Yaakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Sep 26 17:41, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> >=
> ...
> > x11
>
> There is no package named 'x11'.
I thought I'd removed all these non-packages. Changed locally.
T
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
=
...
x11
There is no package named 'x11'.
There is a directory called 'X11' into which all X-related packages are
grouped, which is probably how this entry got
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:06:58PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > > clear
> >
> > This comes from ncurses doesn't it? Is it being purposely dropped from the
> > ncurses distribution? Chuck?
>
> The clear program that
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:06:58PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
clear
This comes from ncurses doesn't it? Is it being purposely dropped from
the
ncurses distribution? Chuck?
The clear program that ships with ncurses is packaged as clearn.exe, to
avoid conf
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:06:58PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Below are the results as of today 2005-09-26. It would be helpful if all
>maintainers could scan this lists again, so that we're sure that nothing
>has been left out accidentally and to cle
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
> other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
> a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,
> there's apparently a need to find
On Sep 23 12:40, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
> >Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Sep 21 20:23, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hack Kampbjorn:
> >>>keychain
> >>>ncftp
> >>>wget
> >>>
> >>>But my last windows computer at home is being hit by a deathstar battle
> >>>station. And I will
Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 21 20:23, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
Hack Kampbjorn:
keychain
ncftp
wget
But my last windows computer at home is being hit by a deathstar battle
station. And I will don't read cygwin mail at work even that I do have a
windows desktop there where
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 21 20:23, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
Hack Kampbjorn:
keychain
ncftp
wget
But my last windows computer at home is being hit by a deathstar battle
station. And I will don't read cygwin mail at work even that I do have a
windows desktop there where I use cygwin everyda
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
LIST 4: MAINTAINED PACKAGES WITH OWNER
==
postgresql Jason Tishler
postgresql Jason Tishler / Reini Urban
Jason up to 7.x (now as curr, soon as prev. see -apps),
me from 8.x on (now as test, s
On Sep 21 20:23, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
> Hack Kampbjorn:
> keychain
> ncftp
> wget
>
> But my last windows computer at home is being hit by a deathstar battle
> station. And I will don't read cygwin mail at work even that I do have a
> windows desktop there where I use cygwin everyday.
Err... w
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Hack!
I rerolled wget with the latest version that supports > 2 GB files, and
offerred to accept maintainership if you didn't want it anymore:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-09/msg00074.html
Chris said to await a response from you:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin
Hack!
I rerolled wget with the latest version that supports > 2 GB files, and
offerred to accept maintainership if you didn't want it anymore:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-09/msg00074.html
Chris said to await a response from you:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-09/msg00075.ht
Hack Kampbjorn:
keychain
ncftp
wget
But my last windows computer at home is being hit by a deathstar battle
station. And I will don't read cygwin mail at work even that I do have a
windows desktop there where I use cygwin everyday.
--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
Hack Kampbjørn
On Sep 21 15:23, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Below are the results as of today 2005-09-19. It would be helpful if all
> >maintainers could scan this lists again,
>
> >LIST 2: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> >=
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Below are the results as of today 2005-09-19. It would be helpful if all
maintainers could scan this lists again,
LIST 2: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
=
par
typespeed
ucl
upx
A transcription er
> procps
I'm still maintaining this. (I've been having problems sending to the list.)
Chris
> LIST 2: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> =
>
> apache
I am Apache 1.3.x maintainer.
Robert
On Sep 19 06:20, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Corinna Vinschen on 9/19/2005 4:54 AM:
> >
> > Below are the results as of today 2005-09-19. It would be helpful if all
> > maintainers could scan this lists again, so that we're sure that nothi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Corinna Vinschen on 9/19/2005 4:54 AM:
>
> Below are the results as of today 2005-09-19. It would be helpful if all
> maintainers could scan this lists again, so that we're sure that nothing
> has been left out accidentally and to clear
On Sep 19 13:40, J?rg Schaible wrote:
> > d
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-09/msg00225.html
Thanks.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
On Sep 19 13:26, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >Who's the maintainer for gnome, gnome-common, gnome-icon-theme and
> >gnome-mime-data now, Gerrit or Yaakov?
>
> There is no package named gnome? The others are from Yaakov.
Thanks, I fixed this in my local list.
Corinna
Little correction:
Corinna Vinschen wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 12:54 PM:
> On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[snip]
> LIST 2: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> =
[snip]
> d
[snip]
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Yaakov,
On Sep 15 13:27, Yaakov S wrote:
libIDL2
I don't see that libIDL2 is in the distro. Did I miss something?
This is currently named libIDL, will be renamed once I'm convinced that
setup is smart enough to handle the situation.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Who's the maintainer for gnome, gnome-common, gnome-icon-theme and
gnome-mime-data now, Gerrit or Yaakov?
There is no package named gnome? The others are from Yaakov.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
It would be nice if somebody will take care about these packages, I
can't maintain the packages, I'm Windows-free now:-)
On Пнд, 2005-09-19 at 12:54 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> LIST 2: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
> =
>
>
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
> other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
> a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,
> there's apparently a need to find
Yaakov,
On Sep 15 13:27, Yaakov S wrote:
> libIDL2
I don't see that libIDL2 is in the distro. Did I miss something?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
On Sep 16 11:29, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Yaakov S wrote:
>
> >Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >
> >>Have I missed one?
> >
> >
> >gtk-doc?
>
> Yes, you're right.
>
> >>If anyone is interested to take over one or more packages feel free to
> >>do so, just drop me a note in my inbox. There are also pac
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
