Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-23 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:58:01PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:43:00PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Does http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00409.html count as (temporarily) passing the baton? Yes.

Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-23 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
My previous response notwithstanding, if you (Igor) do intend to take over maintainership of the generic build script, please feel free to go ahead and do it - I'll spend the time on something else (I've received a request to ITP libsegv, which currently fails two of four testsuite tests, and will

Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-23 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Ronald, I hope what I said below didn't come out as I will take over maintainership. I may be able to commit a few patches (since I have access already), but I doubt I'll have much time for extensive testing or reviewing of others' patches. It would make me much more comfortable if someone else

Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-23 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:52:42AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I hope what I said below didn't come out as I will take over maintainership. Not really: I think the ``I don't have a month worth of developers time. :-)'' was pretty clear that you didn't intend to take over maintainership :)

Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-22 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Wilson wrote: | Off the top of my head, there were patches submitted for some bugfixes | (like the aformentioned sed stuff), functionality extensions (package | listings, gpg signing, etc), and more that I can't recall right now. Here is my

generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-21 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
[Changing to a more descriptive subject] On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: [Dropping cygwin-xfree] On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:04:34PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Brian Ford wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Atwood, Robert C wrote: [snip] Also I

Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:43:00PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Does http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00409.html count as (temporarily) passing the baton? Yes. What are you waiting for? :-) cgf

RE: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-21 Thread Alan Miles
Of Igor Pechtchanski Sent: January 21, 2004 13:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error) On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:43:00PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Does http

Re: generic-build-script maintainership (WAS Re: non-widget child DropSiteManager error)

2004-01-21 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:43:00PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Does http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00409.html count as (temporarily) passing the baton? Yes. What are you waiting for? :-) Igor -- go forth with my blessing. :-) Off the top of my head,