Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote: Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed a) - someone to check it for packaging. b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the distribution. which so long as person in a)

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Lapo Luchini
procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) That's a yes from me. ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) Ths is indeed useful, pro. astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) Abuot ELFIO and astyle I know not what they are...

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:18:16PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Insanely busy at the moment. This is a general problem I assume. I'm doing the same as you, working just voluntarily on Cygwin. It's not a revenue generating project. least *some* reviewing of a package. I think that

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:37:45AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Ok, so the state is now: Update: procps (reviewed, 4 votes, John, Lapo, Robert and me,s discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 2 vote, Lapo and Robert) astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo)

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote: Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed a) - someone to check it for packaging. b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the distribution. which so

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Earnie Boyd
The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right to upload packages. This is one of the reasons I think that it might be better to: 1)

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo) One more thing - this time it is not a package issue. According to 'astyle --help' the program searches for .astylerc in three places: 1)

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo) I did a review of the package itself, not of its feature. astyle contains a lot of options and since I haven't used it in the past its not easy to tell if specific options behaves as expected.

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 08:55:12AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right to upload packages. This

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) I actually voted for this as well as checked it out. __ Yahoo! - We Remember 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:24:54AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) I voted for this one, after reviewing it. Ok, didn't see that. ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) Again, I voted for it, but

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Update: procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me, discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package cleanup needed(?)) astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed)) Btw., I'm under the impression that

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:56:59AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: --- Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) I actually voted for this as well as checked it out. I saw your review but you didn't vote for it (hey, I'm German, I'm the perfect prig

RE: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Morrison, John
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Update: procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me, discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package cleanup needed(?)) astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo,

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed)) I also vote for astyle - i forgot to mention it in the previous post. Btw., I'm under the impression that bookkeeping as above could be useful. I like the idea and you have

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:12:00PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed)) I also vote for astyle - i forgot to mention it in the previous post. Btw., I'm under the impression

RE: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Robb, Sam
...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? ...and... Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for a new package. What about non-maintainers? I'd be perfectly happy to try out packages

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Morrison, John wrote: From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Update: procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me, discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package cleanup needed(?)) astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:19:00AM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote: ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? ...and... Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for a new package. What

[Artistic Style] Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package:doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-10 Thread Ryunosuke Satoh
Hi, Here is one more package, astyle. http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/astyle-package.tar.gz Btw., I'd expect a little bit more information in the message requesting approval of a package. http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting also talks about

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-10 Thread Gareth Pearce
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:05:42AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote: Hi, Here is one more package, astyle. http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/astyle -package.tar.gz http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/doxyge

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:14:46PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: Just a pro-vote - for both - not that i have had a chance to check them for quality... Corinna says: Why not? ummm because I am a busy boy? :P - barely get a few minutes spare at all these days, let alone next to my cygwin

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-10 Thread Earnie Boyd
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:14:46PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: Just a pro-vote - for both - not that i have had a chance to check them for quality... Corinna says: Why not? ummm because I am a busy boy? :P - barely get a few minutes spare at all these days,

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-10 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Earnie Boyd wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:14:46PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: Just a pro-vote - for both - not that i have had a chance to check them for quality... Corinna says: Why not? ummm because I am a busy boy? :P - barely get a few minutes spare at

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-10 Thread Earnie Boyd
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:27:05PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: I agree, even though in the past I've been one of those who've done this. I can see where the breakdown lies. It seems that since Chuck left for vacation that no one takes on looking at a package.

Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-10 Thread Gareth Pearce
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:14:46PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: Just a pro-vote - for both - not that i have had a chance to check them for quality... Corinna says: Why not? ummm because I am a busy boy? :P - barely get a few minutes spare at all these days, let alone next to my

And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17

2002-09-08 Thread Ryunosuke Satoh
Hi, Here is one more package, astyle. http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/astyle-package.tar.gz http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/doxygen-package.tar.gz Sorry, my web server refused bz2 extension. Please extract and check

Re: more package

2002-03-25 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
requires: ash cygwin libintl1 ncurses pcre almost nothing actually depends on the ncurses package. the dependency is probably on the libncurses6 and/or terminfo packages. Thanks. I actually edited a copy of grep's .hint, FYI. grep doesn't have an ncurses dependency. Yes, I added

Re: more package

2002-03-24 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: requires: ash cygwin libintl1 ncurses pcre almost nothing actually depends on the ncurses package. the dependency is probably on the libncurses6 and/or terminfo packages. Thanks. I actually edited a

Re: more package

2002-03-23 Thread Charles Wilson
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: requires: ash cygwin libintl1 ncurses pcre almost nothing actually depends on the ncurses package. the dependency is probably on the libncurses6 and/or terminfo packages. --Chuck