At 07:49 PM 12/3/2000, Danny Yee wrote:
Lizard wrote:
Really? Doesn't the Berne convention override national laws?
Probably, yes. Does that mean national copyright laws only apply to
their own citizens/residents? What happens in the case of dual
citizenship? And does place of publication
At 03:11 AM 9/13/00 -0400, Jodi Hoffman wrote:
I knew there was a reason I printed out NAMBLA's website
throughout the years. Maybe I should contact this child's parents as
well as their attorney. Maybe you should do the same. Maybe you really
are a member of NAMBLA. It certainly
At 10:56 AM 9/13/00 -0400, Jodi Hoffman wrote:
Ah, the Lizard slinks to the support of child rapists and
murderers.
Nope, only to the support of those who advocate it, just like I support
your right to free speech. I daresay you're much more dangerous to children
than any NAMBLA
"Colin A. Reed" wrote:
An independent research group that takes money from the people it's
supposed to be researching is either accepting bribes or stupid, neither
of which says anything good about their conclusions.
Uhm..every non-profit group takes money from contributors...it's how
they
You know, my first thought was something like, "This anti-drug hysteria
made a sick kind of sense in the 80s and early 90s, with soaring crime
rates and a need to find something to blame. But with violent crime
dropping, why does anyone care?" Then, of course, it hit me. As Rand and
others have
Tim May wrote:
At 10:31 PM -0700 6/20/00, Lizard wrote:
Libertarians don't interfere in the choices of others to buy useless
gadgets or to believe foolish things. Where did you get the notion
that "most libertarians" would advocate intervening in such matters?
I do not k
Tim May wrote:
At 9:13 AM -0700 6/21/00, Lizard wrote:
I do not know of any libertarian or right-anarchist who believes a
capitalist society can exist without some means of demanding
compensation for fraud. If you contract to buy apples and I sell you
potatoes instead, there must be some
At 6:10 PM -0700 6/20/00, Tim May wrote:
At 4:54 PM -0700 6/20/00, Lizard wrote:
Matthew Gaylor wrote:
= Beaver College bows to pressure and changes name
Author: Connie Langland
State: PA, Country: United States
URL:
http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/06/13/city/BEAVER13
Microsoft is not interested in innovation or competition. If Bill
Gates could get the DOJ to declare MS the sol legal OS in the US,
he'd do so.
BUT...nothing about capitalism says "Companies must love the thought
of competition". It says "Companies must not be able to use force or
fraud to
At 12:55 PM -0700 6/11/00, Tim May wrote:
Apple would no doubt fail if IBM and Motorola stopped making PPC
chips. This doesn't mean the government has any constitutional or
moral authority to force IBM and Motorola to stay in this business.
Which leads me to this question -- so why doesn't
International 'law' is as strong as the strongest nation that supports
the law. The US will only obey such laws as it finds convenient. Deal
with it, Euroeweenies.
At 10:19 PM -0700 4/7/00, Steve Schear wrote:
At 10:30 AM 4/7/00 -0700, Lizard wrote:
International 'law' is as strong as the strongest nation that supports
the law. The US will only obey such laws as it finds convenient. Deal
with it, Euroeweenies.
Yes, and one has only to look at the hand
At 11:46 PM -0400 4/5/00, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Giving credit to a US president for political change in the USSR seems a
little
far fetched.
So the American space program was not a result of Sputnik? Nations
influence other nations all the time.
The people of the USSR and Eastern
At 1:36 PM -0600 2/18/00, Harold A. Driscoll wrote:
At 20:52 17-02-00 , Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Most people who work for governments are ordinary
people and not the facist thugs of your bizare fantasies.
Do ~ordinary people~ take their company helicopter and drop a home-made
bomb on a
Clinton and Gore are not stupid. They knew that the crypto export ban
would not keep crypto out of the hands of criminals. The eventual repeal
of the ban has been obvious to practically everyone in Washington for
years.
Your faith in government is touching. The fact is, the crypto ban
At 9:52 PM -0500 2/17/00, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Your faith in government is touching. The fact is, the crypto ban will
only
be truly repealed when the NSA has quantum chips that can decode almost
anything in realtime. The government does not care ONE SMEGGING BIT about
Can anyone tell me, precisely, why it is so very scary to imagine that
somewhere in a corporate database is a notation that you like to buy Coca
Cola? Corporations don't scare me -- they want me to be alive, free, and
earning money so that I can buy their products. Corpses and prisoners make
17 matches
Mail list logo
