Title: RE: CDR: Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was Re: Re: Re: whyworry?)
> I think the romans did. they finally lost the fight and state, but it
> lasted for quite a long time, didn't it? and survived a whole bunch of
> crooks.
The Romans had more than one phase of government. Firs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know of no way to lend support to the idea that government in general
> needs good leadership -- history shows that particular governments
> (namely, those that mankind has managed erect) suffer from bad
> leadership.
>
> OTOH, I will admit that humanity is fairly ne
-- Forwarded by Thomas C. Rogers/DSC on 03/02/2000 07:38 PM
---
Tom Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/02/2000 04:53:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Thomas C.
Rogers/DSC)
Subject: Re: CDR: Re: damn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm not saying that life isn't hard. I'm not saying that life is ever
> going to be easy -- but I'd like to make a society that cushions it as
> much as we can. Thats why we get together and make societies in the first
> place .. to make life easier for individuals;
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Sunder wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Most Americans are so dependent, so hopelessly inurred with the current
> > > lifestyle that they wouldn't recognize communism if it bit them in the ass.
> >
> > Agreed. That is precisely my point -- and yet they condemn it
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Any government needs appropriate leadership,
>
> that is an assumption, as yet unproven. I agree that it DOES sound good,
> but it is still an assumption. since the rest of your argument rests on
> it, you should give it a litt
