At 5:19 PM -0700 4/24/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Well, suffice it to say that there are a lot of "clearly special cases."
And suffice it to say that if we drop probation, financial exchanges and
corporate topics and stick with conversations ( information exchanges )
between ordinary individua
At 12:24 AM 4/26/01 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
>I wrote, and to curb offlist replies, flames and comparisons to John Young,
>I write again:
>
>> BTW, I need a gray travel consultant. Lemme know if anybody knows of one.
>> Will accept salt-and-pepper gray.
>
>= low-key/anonymous travel, increasingly
At 02:07 AM 4/26/01 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
>A complete dweeb wrote:
>
>> Anyway, this is an old cpunk topic and there are some asses here,..
>
>*gulp* ASSETS. My apologies for a most inappropriate and unintentional
>remark, I slapped my spellchecker.
>
>~Aimee
Freud.
Quoting Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> John Young wrote:
> >
> > He added that the fact that gummed envelopes can be easily opened
> > by intelligence agencies and law enforcement did not bother people.
> > Sub rosa, implied: people with nothing to hide.
>
> I wonder how many of the sheeple actu
Quoting "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 03:11 PM 4/26/2001 -0400,
>
> James Donald:
> >> Faustine demonstrating his(SIC)cheerful ignorance of economics, and who
> is who in economics:
> Faustine wrote:
> >No need to get personal.
>
> I find your put downs offensive.
What put downs
> Tim May[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> At 12:51 PM -0700 4/25/01, Woody Patterson wrote:
> >--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> It's just as easy today- at least for one-ways. Just have the
> >> individual
> >> with the ID check in and hand the ticket to you. I've done it a
> >> million
> >> tim
--
At 03:11 PM 4/26/2001 -0400,
James Donald:
>> Faustine demonstrating his cheerful ignorance of economics, and who is
>> who in economics:
Faustine wrote:
>No need to get personal.
I find your put downs offensive. You write as if everyone, including
libertarians, agreed that libertarians
