Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-30 Thread Faustine
Quoting "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 03:37 PM 4/27/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote: > > We should hold ourselves and our friends to HIGHER standards if we > > want to get somewhere in the long run. > > You could start by holding yourself to the standard of actually having > some > fain

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-30 Thread Faustine
Quoting William Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Faustine replies: > > Quoting William Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [David Friedman has published in ...] > > > Journal of Law and Economics (more than once) > > > Journal of Political Economy (more than once) > > > American Economic Review > > > > >

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-28 Thread James A. Donald
-- At 03:37 PM 4/27/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote: > We should hold ourselves and our friends to HIGHER standards if we > want to get somewhere in the long run. You could start by holding yourself to the standard of actually having some faint glimmering of knowledge about the research areas of t

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-27 Thread Faustine
Quoting "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 03:11 PM 4/26/2001 -0400, > > James Donald: > >> Faustine demonstrating his(SIC)cheerful ignorance of economics, and who > is who in economics: > Faustine wrote: > >No need to get personal. > > I find your put downs offensive. What put downs

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-27 Thread James A. Donald
-- At 03:11 PM 4/26/2001 -0400, James Donald: >> Faustine demonstrating his cheerful ignorance of economics, and who is >> who in economics: Faustine wrote: >No need to get personal. I find your put downs offensive. You write as if everyone, including libertarians, agreed that libertarians

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-26 Thread Faustine
Quoting "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Faustine demonstrating his (SIC) cheerful ignorance of economics, and who is > who in economics: No need to get personal. I know how well-regarded Friedman is in Libertarian circles. Ignorant in many respects, certainly; about economics in genera

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-26 Thread James A. Donald
-- Faustine demonstrating his cheerful ignorance of economics, and who is who in economics: > > > [David Friedman has published . . .] Nothing good enough to get > > > mentioned at NBER, the veritable gold standard William Vogt > > AER is usually considered the top economics journal. JPE is

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-25 Thread Faustine
Quoting William Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Faustine sez: > [David Friedman has published . . .] > > Nothing good enough to get mentioned at NBER, the > > veritable gold standard > > (if > > you'll allow) of academic research in economics. > > 5 minutes of time at econlit (the standard index > o

RE: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-25 Thread Phillip H. Zakas
ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)] Quoting "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -- > At 04:50 PM 4/24/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote: > >http://www.best.com/~ddfr/Ac

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-25 Thread Faustine
Quoting "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -- > At 04:50 PM 4/24/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote: > >http://www.best.com/~ddfr/Academic/Anarchy_and_Eff_Law/Anarchy_and_Eff_Law. > html. > > > > > >I read these essays: is this really representative of his best work? > It > seemed > >awfully ru

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-25 Thread James A. Donald
-- At 04:50 PM 4/24/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote: >http://www.best.com/~ddfr/Academic/Anarchy_and_Eff_Law/Anarchy_and_Eff_Law. html. > > >I read these essays: is this really representative of his best work? It seemed >awfully rudimentary. In fact, I did a search on the NBER website for any real

Re: [Fwd: YOU ARE INVITED: "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- Next Independent Policy Forum (4/24/01)]

2001-04-24 Thread Faustine
Quoting "Fred C. Moulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: (snip) > See David Friedman's related essays: > > "A World of Strong Privacy: Promises and Perils of Encryption" > http://www.best.com/~ddfr/Academic/Strong_Privacy/Strong_Privacy.html > > "Contracts in Cyberspace" > http://www.best.com/~ddfr/Acad